Acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness: a dose-response shear-wave elastography study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1496825
Sara Kranjc, Mojca Fink, Masatoshi Nakamura, Žiga Kozinc
{"title":"Acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness: a dose-response shear-wave elastography study.","authors":"Sara Kranjc, Mojca Fink, Masatoshi Nakamura, Žiga Kozinc","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1496825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching is widely used to increase range of motion, but its underlying mechanisms are not well understood. This experimental, parallel group design study investigated the acute effects of PNF stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness and explored a potential dose-response relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy young adults (23 females, 7 males) were randomly assigned to either a PNF stretching group (n = 15; 22.96 ± 2.2 years) or a control group (n = 15; 23.3 ± 2.1 years). Rectus femoris stiffness was measured using shear-wave elastography (Resona 7, Mindray, China) at two locations (distal and proximal) before and after the second, fourth, and sixth sets of PNF stretching. The protocol involved six sets, each with three 10-s stretches and 5-s maximal contractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that PNF stretching had no statistically significant effect on muscle stiffness, with no main effects of group (F = 0.05; <i>p</i> = 0.830) or time (F = 0.545; <i>p</i> = 0.653), and no significant interactions. However, the proximal location showed a substantially higher shear modulus compared to the distal location (F = 63.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.69), independent of group or time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight a location-specific difference in muscle stiffness that was unaffected by the intervention. In conclusion, PNF stretching did not acutely reduce rectus femoris stiffness compared to passive rest, regardless of the number of stretching sets performed. Further research is needed to understand the muscle-specific effects of PNF stretching.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1496825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1496825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching is widely used to increase range of motion, but its underlying mechanisms are not well understood. This experimental, parallel group design study investigated the acute effects of PNF stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness and explored a potential dose-response relationship.

Methods: Thirty healthy young adults (23 females, 7 males) were randomly assigned to either a PNF stretching group (n = 15; 22.96 ± 2.2 years) or a control group (n = 15; 23.3 ± 2.1 years). Rectus femoris stiffness was measured using shear-wave elastography (Resona 7, Mindray, China) at two locations (distal and proximal) before and after the second, fourth, and sixth sets of PNF stretching. The protocol involved six sets, each with three 10-s stretches and 5-s maximal contractions.

Results: The results indicate that PNF stretching had no statistically significant effect on muscle stiffness, with no main effects of group (F = 0.05; p = 0.830) or time (F = 0.545; p = 0.653), and no significant interactions. However, the proximal location showed a substantially higher shear modulus compared to the distal location (F = 63.6; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.69), independent of group or time.

Discussion: These findings highlight a location-specific difference in muscle stiffness that was unaffected by the intervention. In conclusion, PNF stretching did not acutely reduce rectus femoris stiffness compared to passive rest, regardless of the number of stretching sets performed. Further research is needed to understand the muscle-specific effects of PNF stretching.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本体感觉神经肌肉易化拉伸对股直肌僵硬的急性影响:一项剂量-反应剪切波弹性成像研究。
本体感觉神经肌肉促进(PNF)拉伸被广泛用于增加运动范围,但其潜在机制尚不清楚。本实验平行组设计研究考察了PNF拉伸对股直肌僵硬度的急性影响,并探讨了潜在的剂量-反应关系。方法:30名健康年轻人(23名女性,7名男性)随机分为PNF拉伸组(n = 15;22.96±2.2年)或对照组(n = 15;(23.3±2.1岁)。在第二组、第四组和第六组PNF拉伸前后,使用剪切波弹性成像(Resona 7, Mindray, China)在两个位置(远端和近端)测量股直肌刚度。该方案包括六组,每组有三个10秒的拉伸和5秒的最大收缩。结果:PNF拉伸对肌肉僵硬度的影响无统计学意义,组间无主效应(F = 0.05;p = 0.830)或时间(F = 0.545;P = 0.653),且无显著相互作用。然而,与远端位置相比,近端位置显示出更高的剪切模量(F = 63.6;P < 0.001;η2 = 0.69),与分组和时间无关。讨论:这些发现强调了肌肉僵硬的位置特异性差异,而这种差异不受干预的影响。综上所述,与被动休息相比,无论拉伸次数如何,PNF拉伸都不会显著降低股直肌僵硬度。需要进一步的研究来了解PNF拉伸对肌肉的特异性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Performance prediction equation for the Valencia Marathon based on time and pacing in the half marathon. Accentuated eccentric loading in lower-body resistance training: a systematic review of acute and chronic adaptations on strength, power, and speed outcomes. Acute enhancement strategies for countermovement jump performance: a network meta-analysis of different resistance training protocols. Time-efficient and beneficial strategy: low-volume high-intensity interval training for cardiometabolic health and body composition outcomes in children and adolescents with overweight or obesity-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Beyond vascular recanalization: precision medicine in cervical artery dissection guided by multiple mechanisms and multimodal imaging for brain functional recovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1