Association between white blood cell count and coronary artery bypass graft failure: an individual patient data analysis of clinical trials.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1186/s13019-024-03330-5
Kevin R An, Sigrid Sandner, Joyce Peper, Yanzai Zhou, Jurrien M Ten Berg, Lamia Harik, Yunpeng Zhu, Laura M Willemsen, Qiang Zhao, Björn Redfors, Subodh Verma, Mario F L Gaudino
{"title":"Association between white blood cell count and coronary artery bypass graft failure: an individual patient data analysis of clinical trials.","authors":"Kevin R An, Sigrid Sandner, Joyce Peper, Yanzai Zhou, Jurrien M Ten Berg, Lamia Harik, Yunpeng Zhu, Laura M Willemsen, Qiang Zhao, Björn Redfors, Subodh Verma, Mario F L Gaudino","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-03330-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Baseline systemic inflammation is associated with worse long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], but the mechanisms of this association are unclear. This study aims to explore the association between pre-operative white blood cell [WBC] count and CABG graft failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We pooled individual patient data from two randomized clinical trials with systematic CABG graft imaging. The primary analysis was the association between pre-operative WBC count and graft failure, as a continuous variable, at the time of imaging after CABG, using mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 910 patients and 2,036 grafts were included in the analysis [1,120 saphenous vein grafts, 828 left internal thoracic arteries, 76 right internal thoracic arteries, and 12 radial arteries]. The median time to imaging was 1.01 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.99;1.03] years and the median pre-operative WBC count was 7.1 [IQR, 6.0;8.4] x 10<sup>9</sup>/L. There was no association between WBC count and graft failure at both the patient and the individual graft level [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98;1.17), p = 0.11 and aOR 1.09 (95% CI, 0.91;1.30), p = 0.37], respectively. When evaluated as a dichotomous variable [≥ 11 vs. < 11 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L] and by quartile, WBC count was not associated with graft failure at the patient and individual graft levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this pooled analysis of individual patient data from two randomized clinical trials, WBC count was not associated with graft failure after CABG. The reported association between inflammation and CABG is likely mediated through other mechanisms, such as native coronary artery disease progression.</p><p><strong>Impact on daily practice: </strong>The lack of a clear association between WBC count and graft failure suggests that pre-operative WBC count should not be routinely used as a predictor of graft failure after CABG.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03330-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Baseline systemic inflammation is associated with worse long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], but the mechanisms of this association are unclear. This study aims to explore the association between pre-operative white blood cell [WBC] count and CABG graft failure.

Methods: We pooled individual patient data from two randomized clinical trials with systematic CABG graft imaging. The primary analysis was the association between pre-operative WBC count and graft failure, as a continuous variable, at the time of imaging after CABG, using mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: Overall, 910 patients and 2,036 grafts were included in the analysis [1,120 saphenous vein grafts, 828 left internal thoracic arteries, 76 right internal thoracic arteries, and 12 radial arteries]. The median time to imaging was 1.01 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.99;1.03] years and the median pre-operative WBC count was 7.1 [IQR, 6.0;8.4] x 109/L. There was no association between WBC count and graft failure at both the patient and the individual graft level [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98;1.17), p = 0.11 and aOR 1.09 (95% CI, 0.91;1.30), p = 0.37], respectively. When evaluated as a dichotomous variable [≥ 11 vs. < 11 × 109/L] and by quartile, WBC count was not associated with graft failure at the patient and individual graft levels.

Conclusion: In this pooled analysis of individual patient data from two randomized clinical trials, WBC count was not associated with graft failure after CABG. The reported association between inflammation and CABG is likely mediated through other mechanisms, such as native coronary artery disease progression.

Impact on daily practice: The lack of a clear association between WBC count and graft failure suggests that pre-operative WBC count should not be routinely used as a predictor of graft failure after CABG.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白细胞计数与冠状动脉旁路移植失败之间的关系:临床试验的个体患者数据分析。
背景:基线全身性炎症与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后较差的长期预后相关,但这种关联的机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨术前白细胞(WBC)计数与冠脉搭桥移植失败的关系。方法:我们汇集了来自两项随机临床试验的患者数据,并进行了系统的冠脉搭桥成像。主要分析术前WBC计数与移植失败之间的关系,作为一个连续变量,在CABG后成像时,使用混合效应多变量逻辑回归模型。结果:共纳入910例患者和2036例移植物[1120例隐静脉移植物,828例左胸内动脉,76例右胸内动脉,12例桡动脉]。中位成像时间为1.01[四分位间距(IQR), 0.99;1.03]年,术前中位WBC计数为7.1 [IQR, 6.0;8.4] × 109/L。在患者和单个移植水平上,WBC计数与移植失败均无关联[调整优势比(aOR) 1.07(95%可信区间(CI) 0.98;1.17), p = 0.11]和调整优势比(aOR) 1.09 (95% CI, 0.91;1.30), p = 0.37]。当作为二分类变量[≥11 vs. 9/L]和按四分位数进行评估时,白细胞计数在患者和个体移植水平上与移植失败无关。结论:在对来自两项随机临床试验的个体患者数据的汇总分析中,白细胞计数与CABG后移植物衰竭无关。已报道的炎症与冠状动脉搭桥之间的关联可能是通过其他机制介导的,例如原生冠状动脉疾病进展。对日常实践的影响:白细胞计数与移植物衰竭之间缺乏明确的关联,这表明术前白细胞计数不应常规用作冠脉搭桥后移植物衰竭的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Application of supervised machine learning algorithms to predict in-hospital death risk in patients receiving intra-aortic balloon pump therapy during the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. Effect of preoperative respiratory prehabilitation on cardiopulmonary function in patients undergoing lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Hybrid zone 1 TEVAR using a single-fenestrated PMEG after left common carotid to left subclavian bypass: a case report. Unexpected localized pleural metastasis without pathologically confirmed nodal involvement in a central ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma: a case report. Inadequate preoperative smoking cessation fails to improve outcomes after esophagectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1