States Do Not Delineate the "Accepted Medical Standards" for Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02209-6
Dylan Landau, Matthew P Kirschen, David Greer, Ariane Lewis
{"title":"States Do Not Delineate the \"Accepted Medical Standards\" for Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination.","authors":"Dylan Landau, Matthew P Kirschen, David Greer, Ariane Lewis","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02209-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Uniform Determination of Death Act requires brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) determination to be in accordance with \"accepted medical standards.\" The medical organizations responsible for delineating these guidelines are only specified statutorily in two states. State health organizations (SHOs) are composed of policy experts and medical professionals who are responsible for addressing medical, ethical, and legislative problems related to health. We sought to evaluate information publicly available on SHO websites regarding BD/DNC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2023 to August 2024, we searched SHO (health department, medical board, medical society, and hospital association) websites for the 48 states without statutory guidance regarding what constitutes accepted medical standards for information regarding BD/DNC using the terms \"brain death,\" \"brain stem,\" and \"determination of death.\" All posts related to BD/DNC were reviewed and categorized via thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 192 SHO websites searched, there were 35 from 28 states that provided information regarding BD/DNC: 14 medical societies, 12 health departments, 8 hospital associations, and 1 medical board. Of these 35 SHOs, 12 referenced the state's legal statute, 11 referenced hospital/state/model policies or guidance, 3 referenced both legal statutes and hospital/state/model policies or guidelines, 3 referenced explicit support for standardized BD/DNC guidelines, and 6 made other mention of BD/DNC. New York was the only state with an SHO that provided clear guidance regarding accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For most states, the accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination are not identified on SHO websites or statutorily. This contributes to inconsistencies across hospital BD/DNC determination policies, leading to medical, ethical, and legal challenges. Delineation of the accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination in each state could help facilitate consistency and accuracy in BD/DNC determination, prevent false positive determinations of death, and promote public trust in BD/DNC determination and the medical system overall.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"177-185"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02209-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Uniform Determination of Death Act requires brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) determination to be in accordance with "accepted medical standards." The medical organizations responsible for delineating these guidelines are only specified statutorily in two states. State health organizations (SHOs) are composed of policy experts and medical professionals who are responsible for addressing medical, ethical, and legislative problems related to health. We sought to evaluate information publicly available on SHO websites regarding BD/DNC.

Methods: From December 2023 to August 2024, we searched SHO (health department, medical board, medical society, and hospital association) websites for the 48 states without statutory guidance regarding what constitutes accepted medical standards for information regarding BD/DNC using the terms "brain death," "brain stem," and "determination of death." All posts related to BD/DNC were reviewed and categorized via thematic analysis.

Results: Of the 192 SHO websites searched, there were 35 from 28 states that provided information regarding BD/DNC: 14 medical societies, 12 health departments, 8 hospital associations, and 1 medical board. Of these 35 SHOs, 12 referenced the state's legal statute, 11 referenced hospital/state/model policies or guidance, 3 referenced both legal statutes and hospital/state/model policies or guidelines, 3 referenced explicit support for standardized BD/DNC guidelines, and 6 made other mention of BD/DNC. New York was the only state with an SHO that provided clear guidance regarding accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination.

Conclusions: For most states, the accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination are not identified on SHO websites or statutorily. This contributes to inconsistencies across hospital BD/DNC determination policies, leading to medical, ethical, and legal challenges. Delineation of the accepted medical standards for BD/DNC determination in each state could help facilitate consistency and accuracy in BD/DNC determination, prevent false positive determinations of death, and promote public trust in BD/DNC determination and the medical system overall.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各州没有通过神经学标准确定脑死亡/死亡的“可接受医学标准”。
背景:《死亡统一判定法》要求脑死亡/神经系统死亡标准(BD/DNC)判定必须符合“公认的医学标准”。负责制定这些指导方针的医疗组织只在两个州有法定规定。国家卫生组织由政策专家和医疗专业人员组成,负责处理与卫生有关的医学、伦理和立法问题。我们试图评估SHO网站上关于BD/DNC的公开信息。方法:从2023年12月到2024年8月,我们搜索了48个州的SHO(卫生部门,医学委员会,医学协会和医院协会)网站,没有关于使用术语“脑死亡”,“脑干”和“确定死亡”构成可接受的BD/DNC信息的医学标准的法定指导。所有与BD/DNC有关的员额都通过专题分析进行审查和分类。结果:在检索的192个SHO网站中,来自28个州的35个网站提供了有关BD/DNC的信息:14个医学会、12个卫生部门、8个医院协会和1个医学委员会。在这35个SHOs中,12个参考了州的法律法规,11个参考了医院/州/示范政策或指导,3个参考了法律法规和医院/州/示范政策或指导,3个参考了对标准化BD/DNC指导的明确支持,6个提到了BD/DNC。纽约州是唯一一个制定了关于确定BD/DNC的公认医疗标准的明确指导意见的州。结论:在大多数州,确定BD/DNC的公认医学标准没有在SHO网站或法律上确定。这导致了医院BD/DNC确定政策的不一致性,从而导致了医疗、道德和法律方面的挑战。界定各州公认的BD/DNC鉴定医学标准,有助于促进BD/DNC鉴定的一致性和准确性,防止死亡鉴定的假阳性,促进公众对BD/DNC鉴定和整个医疗系统的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Value of MRI Anatomical Radiologic Scores for One-Year Neurological Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Prognostic Factors Associated with Pneumonia in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurosurgical Patients: A Single-Center Analysis and Systematic Review. Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model Integrating the Red Cell Distribution Width-to-Serum Calcium Ratio and N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide for Outcome Prediction after Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Medical Complications After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Analysis of Trends in US Admissions from 2006 to 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1