Definition of a European pre-vasectomy scoring system to identify patients at risk of vasectomy regret.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Sexual Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/sexmed/qfae094
Amandine Degraeve, Lorenzo Tosco, Bertrand Tombal, Thierry Roumeguere, Jeanne Beirnaert, Robin Hamal, Céline Bugli, Marco Cosentino, Lee Wai Gin Don, Marta Skrodzka, Maarten Albersen, Koenraad van Renterghem, Maxime Sempels, David Penning, Mikkel Fode, Antoine Faix, Marjan Waterloos, Borja Garcia Gomez, Damien Carnicelli, Jean-Pierre Graziana, Afonso Morgado, Kathleen D'Hauwers, Ege Serefoglu, Celeste Manfredi, Emmanuel Weyne, Jack Beck, Daniar Osmonov, Chris Roller, Ludovic Ferreti, Giogio Russo, Faysal A Yafi, Beatrice Cuzin, François-Xavier Madec, Geoffroy Vanoverschelde, François Hervé, Eric Chung, Ulla Nordström, Andrea Cocci, Rawad Abou Zahr, François Triffaux, Minhas Suks, Hussain Alnajjar, Julien Van Damme, Sam Ward
{"title":"Definition of a European pre-vasectomy scoring system to identify patients at risk of vasectomy regret.","authors":"Amandine Degraeve, Lorenzo Tosco, Bertrand Tombal, Thierry Roumeguere, Jeanne Beirnaert, Robin Hamal, Céline Bugli, Marco Cosentino, Lee Wai Gin Don, Marta Skrodzka, Maarten Albersen, Koenraad van Renterghem, Maxime Sempels, David Penning, Mikkel Fode, Antoine Faix, Marjan Waterloos, Borja Garcia Gomez, Damien Carnicelli, Jean-Pierre Graziana, Afonso Morgado, Kathleen D'Hauwers, Ege Serefoglu, Celeste Manfredi, Emmanuel Weyne, Jack Beck, Daniar Osmonov, Chris Roller, Ludovic Ferreti, Giogio Russo, Faysal A Yafi, Beatrice Cuzin, François-Xavier Madec, Geoffroy Vanoverschelde, François Hervé, Eric Chung, Ulla Nordström, Andrea Cocci, Rawad Abou Zahr, François Triffaux, Minhas Suks, Hussain Alnajjar, Julien Van Damme, Sam Ward","doi":"10.1093/sexmed/qfae094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vasectomy is a widely used, safe, effective method of permanent contraception and contributes to healthy sexuality.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We have conducted a 3-step observational clinical study to develop a vasectomy regret risk score and guide patients and clinicians when discussing a vasectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-step approach has been followed. First, experts involved in male health have proposed risk factors for regret (remorse) after vasectomy, defined by a vasectomy reversal surgery or medically assisted reproduction. The selected factors were evaluated in 1200 patients vasectomized in the last 15 years. Finally, the expert panel has constructed a score for predicting regret after vasectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two international experts identified 17 risk factors for vasectomy regret. Five of the risk factors were significant: an age <35 years old, a high Barrat Impulsivity Score, a low level of education, and a patient who didn't understand that the vasectomy might not be reversible or for whom the contraception responsibility is ideally feminine, or no responsible partner. On multivariate analysis, 3 risk factors and 2 \"sine qua non\" conditions were used to build the decision algorithm. A risk score ≥ 4 required information on sperm cryopreservation before vasectomy, and those with a risk score ≥ 7 required extra time for reflection. The scoring system was proposed to 52 international experts and accepted with 86.7% strongly agreeing. The model's sensitivity and specificity were 0.98 and 0.53, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A decisional algorithm was established to identify patients requiring information on sperm cryopreservation before vasectomy or additional time for reflection to reduce the risk of vasectomy regret. The algorithm contains 3 risk factors and 2 \"<i>sine qua non</i>\" conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21782,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Medicine","volume":"12 6","pages":"qfae094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfae094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vasectomy is a widely used, safe, effective method of permanent contraception and contributes to healthy sexuality.

Aims: We have conducted a 3-step observational clinical study to develop a vasectomy regret risk score and guide patients and clinicians when discussing a vasectomy.

Methods: A 3-step approach has been followed. First, experts involved in male health have proposed risk factors for regret (remorse) after vasectomy, defined by a vasectomy reversal surgery or medically assisted reproduction. The selected factors were evaluated in 1200 patients vasectomized in the last 15 years. Finally, the expert panel has constructed a score for predicting regret after vasectomy.

Results: Fifty-two international experts identified 17 risk factors for vasectomy regret. Five of the risk factors were significant: an age <35 years old, a high Barrat Impulsivity Score, a low level of education, and a patient who didn't understand that the vasectomy might not be reversible or for whom the contraception responsibility is ideally feminine, or no responsible partner. On multivariate analysis, 3 risk factors and 2 "sine qua non" conditions were used to build the decision algorithm. A risk score ≥ 4 required information on sperm cryopreservation before vasectomy, and those with a risk score ≥ 7 required extra time for reflection. The scoring system was proposed to 52 international experts and accepted with 86.7% strongly agreeing. The model's sensitivity and specificity were 0.98 and 0.53, respectively.

Conclusion: A decisional algorithm was established to identify patients requiring information on sperm cryopreservation before vasectomy or additional time for reflection to reduce the risk of vasectomy regret. The algorithm contains 3 risk factors and 2 "sine qua non" conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual Medicine
Sexual Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Medicine is an official publication of the International Society for Sexual Medicine, and serves the field as the peer-reviewed, open access journal for rapid dissemination of multidisciplinary clinical and basic research in all areas of global sexual medicine, and particularly acts as a venue for topics of regional or sub-specialty interest. The journal is focused on issues in clinical medicine and epidemiology but also publishes basic science papers with particular relevance to specific populations. Sexual Medicine offers clinicians and researchers a rapid route to publication and the opportunity to publish in a broadly distributed and highly visible global forum. The journal publishes high quality articles from all over the world and actively seeks submissions from countries with expanding sexual medicine communities. Sexual Medicine relies on the same expert panel of editors and reviewers as The Journal of Sexual Medicine and Sexual Medicine Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Definition of a European pre-vasectomy scoring system to identify patients at risk of vasectomy regret. Nutraceutical and low energy shockwave treatments improved sexual function recovery in a rat pelvic neurovascular injury model. Masked liking of pornography: implicit associations in men with compulsive sexual behavior. Impact of bladder management methods and other factors on sexual activity in women with chronic spinal cord injury/disease. Unveiling intimacy: sexual dysfunction and marital satisfaction among Pakistani males in Karachi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1