Diffusion tensor imaging in peroneal neuropathy: a prospective, single-centre study.

IF 2.4 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000876
Christophe Oosterbos, Ahmed M Radwan, Stefan Sunaert, Sophie Hoornaert, Anais Van Hoylandt, Robin Lemmens, Tom Theys
{"title":"Diffusion tensor imaging in peroneal neuropathy: a prospective, single-centre study.","authors":"Christophe Oosterbos, Ahmed M Radwan, Stefan Sunaert, Sophie Hoornaert, Anais Van Hoylandt, Robin Lemmens, Tom Theys","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) showed promising results in diagnosing upper limb neuropathies, but its value in patients with foot drop due to peroneal neuropathy has not yet been investigated. We aim to establish reference values for DTI metrics of the healthy peroneal nerve and to evaluate differences in DTI metrics between patients and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) from 22 pathological nerves, 14 asymptomatic patients' nerves and 65 healthy peroneal nerves were processed for quantitative assessment of fractional anisotropy (FA), radial diffusivity (RD), axial diffusivity and mean diffusivity. Clinical baseline and follow-up data were prospectively collected for all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean patient FA values (0.40, SD 0.08) were significantly lower compared with healthy controls (mean FA 0.44, SD 0.06). Mean patient RD values (0.98 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, SD 0.21 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s) were significantly higher compared with healthy controls (mean RD 0.85 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, SD 0.16 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s). FA values were significantly lower in patients with severe foot drop (mean FA 0.40, SD 0.06) compared with non-severe foot drop (mean FA 0.48, SD 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these results, DTI appears to aid in the differential diagnostic process of patients with peroneal neuropathy. Future studies should focus on automation of DWI processing, confirm the results in larger patient groups and try to establish reliable cut-off values for DTI metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000876"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) showed promising results in diagnosing upper limb neuropathies, but its value in patients with foot drop due to peroneal neuropathy has not yet been investigated. We aim to establish reference values for DTI metrics of the healthy peroneal nerve and to evaluate differences in DTI metrics between patients and healthy controls.

Methods: Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) from 22 pathological nerves, 14 asymptomatic patients' nerves and 65 healthy peroneal nerves were processed for quantitative assessment of fractional anisotropy (FA), radial diffusivity (RD), axial diffusivity and mean diffusivity. Clinical baseline and follow-up data were prospectively collected for all patients.

Results: Mean patient FA values (0.40, SD 0.08) were significantly lower compared with healthy controls (mean FA 0.44, SD 0.06). Mean patient RD values (0.98 10-3 mm2/s, SD 0.21 10-3 mm2/s) were significantly higher compared with healthy controls (mean RD 0.85 10-3 mm2/s, SD 0.16 10-3 mm2/s). FA values were significantly lower in patients with severe foot drop (mean FA 0.40, SD 0.06) compared with non-severe foot drop (mean FA 0.48, SD 0.05).

Conclusion: Based on these results, DTI appears to aid in the differential diagnostic process of patients with peroneal neuropathy. Future studies should focus on automation of DWI processing, confirm the results in larger patient groups and try to establish reliable cut-off values for DTI metrics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腓神经病变弥散张量成像:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
目的:弥散张量成像(Diffusion tensor imaging, DTI)对上肢神经病变的诊断有较好的效果,但其对腓神经病变所致足下垂的诊断价值尚不明确。我们的目的是建立健康腓神经DTI指标的参考值,并评估患者与健康对照组之间DTI指标的差异。方法:对22条病理神经、14条无症状患者神经和65条健康腓神经的弥散加权图像(DWI)进行定量评价,测定各向异性分数(FA)、径向弥散度(RD)、轴向弥散度和平均弥散度。前瞻性地收集所有患者的临床基线和随访数据。结果:患者平均FA值(0.40,SD 0.08)显著低于健康对照组(平均FA 0.44, SD 0.06)。患者平均RD值(0.98 10-3 mm2/s, SD 0.21 10-3 mm2/s)显著高于健康对照组(平均RD 0.85 10-3 mm2/s, SD 0.16 10-3 mm2/s)。重度足下垂患者FA值(平均FA 0.40, SD 0.06)显著低于非重度足下垂患者FA值(平均FA 0.48, SD 0.05)。结论:基于这些结果,DTI似乎有助于腓神经病变患者的鉴别诊断过程。未来的研究应侧重于DWI处理的自动化,在更大的患者群体中确认结果,并尝试建立可靠的DTI指标临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Low risk of severe COVID-19 in vaccinated people with multiple sclerosis: a nationwide Norwegian study. United Kingdom Young Stroke Study (UKYSS): study protocol for an ambispective observational study. Hallucinations and cognitive impairment are associated with blood pressure fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. Poststroke fatigue in subacute and chronic stroke rehabilitation phase: prevalence, associated factors and impact on self-efficacy and functional ability. When images come to life: a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1