Optimising early detection of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of quantitative screening tools for primary care.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-01-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000913
Sean Inzerillo, Pemla Jagtiani, Salazar Jones
{"title":"Optimising early detection of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of quantitative screening tools for primary care.","authors":"Sean Inzerillo, Pemla Jagtiani, Salazar Jones","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is often challenging due to subtle, non-specific symptoms, limited disease awareness and a lack of definitive diagnostic criteria. As primary care physicians are typically the first to encounter patients with early DCM, equipping them with effective screening tools is crucial for reducing diagnostic delays and improving patient outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of quantitative screening methods for DCM that can be implemented in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted across PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library up to July 2024 using keywords relevant to DCM screening. Studies were included if they evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of DCM screening tools applicable to primary care settings. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 14 studies evaluating 18 screening methods for DCM. Questionnaires consistently showed high diagnostic accuracy, with Youden indices exceeding 0.60, while only three out of nine conventional physical performance tests met the same threshold. Sensor-assisted tests, particularly those using advanced technology like finger-wearable gyro sensors, exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy but present challenges related to accessibility and learning curves.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the potential of quantitative screening methods for early DCM detection in primary care. While questionnaires and conventional tests are effective and accessible, sensor-assisted tests offer greater accuracy but face implementation challenges. A tailored, multifaceted approach is crucial for improving outcomes. Future research should focus on validating these tools in diverse populations and standardising diagnostic criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is often challenging due to subtle, non-specific symptoms, limited disease awareness and a lack of definitive diagnostic criteria. As primary care physicians are typically the first to encounter patients with early DCM, equipping them with effective screening tools is crucial for reducing diagnostic delays and improving patient outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of quantitative screening methods for DCM that can be implemented in primary care settings.

Methods: A systematic search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted across PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library up to July 2024 using keywords relevant to DCM screening. Studies were included if they evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of DCM screening tools applicable to primary care settings. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

Results: The search identified 14 studies evaluating 18 screening methods for DCM. Questionnaires consistently showed high diagnostic accuracy, with Youden indices exceeding 0.60, while only three out of nine conventional physical performance tests met the same threshold. Sensor-assisted tests, particularly those using advanced technology like finger-wearable gyro sensors, exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy but present challenges related to accessibility and learning curves.

Conclusion: This review highlights the potential of quantitative screening methods for early DCM detection in primary care. While questionnaires and conventional tests are effective and accessible, sensor-assisted tests offer greater accuracy but face implementation challenges. A tailored, multifaceted approach is crucial for improving outcomes. Future research should focus on validating these tools in diverse populations and standardising diagnostic criteria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spinal cord demyelination predicts neurological deterioration in patients with mild degenerative cervical myelopathy. Qualitative systematic review on the lived experience of functional neurological disorder. Acute therapeutic effects and pathophysiology of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis neuropathy. Optimising early detection of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of quantitative screening tools for primary care. Cognitive impairment in PSP compared with PD: assessment by clinical subtype and longitudinal change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1