Qualitative systematic review on the lived experience of functional neurological disorder.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-01-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000694
Andrea Szasz, Anthony Korner, Loyola McLean
{"title":"Qualitative systematic review on the lived experience of functional neurological disorder.","authors":"Andrea Szasz, Anthony Korner, Loyola McLean","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a complex disorder, recently attracting much research into aetiology and treatment. However, there is limited research on the patient's lived experience. This paper addresses this gap to ask: 'What is the subjective life experience of adult patients living with FND?'</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 1980 to 2020, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL and Embase were searched for English language qualitative adult research. The disciplines used general medicine, psychiatry, physiotherapy, nursing, neurology, psychosomatic medicine and occupational therapy. The qualitative literature search included book chapters, theses, fellowship reports and conference articles as well as peer-reviewed scientific journals.The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess 33 papers, with eight papers included in the final synthesis. Nine additional papers, suggested during review, were evaluated but excluded from synthesis, though incorporated elsewhere in the paper. Two authors used an integrative immersion approach to identify the literature's main themes using line-by-line and top-down methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight main themes were identified: lost, body-mind dualism, preceding stressful events, relatedness, stigma, the battle or fight, the burden and losses of the illness and trust versus mistrust. From these emerged a central overarching theme of relationally regulated selves, which posits the essence of the lived experience of FND as responding to stressful experiences within a relational, regulatory context.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalent themes give valuable insight into the lived experience of FND and the impact of stressors, past and present, and the relational environment in the development of and recovery from the disorder. Further research is needed to support the formulation of the patient experience and cocreated recovery pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a complex disorder, recently attracting much research into aetiology and treatment. However, there is limited research on the patient's lived experience. This paper addresses this gap to ask: 'What is the subjective life experience of adult patients living with FND?'

Methods: From 1980 to 2020, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL and Embase were searched for English language qualitative adult research. The disciplines used general medicine, psychiatry, physiotherapy, nursing, neurology, psychosomatic medicine and occupational therapy. The qualitative literature search included book chapters, theses, fellowship reports and conference articles as well as peer-reviewed scientific journals.The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess 33 papers, with eight papers included in the final synthesis. Nine additional papers, suggested during review, were evaluated but excluded from synthesis, though incorporated elsewhere in the paper. Two authors used an integrative immersion approach to identify the literature's main themes using line-by-line and top-down methods.

Results: Eight main themes were identified: lost, body-mind dualism, preceding stressful events, relatedness, stigma, the battle or fight, the burden and losses of the illness and trust versus mistrust. From these emerged a central overarching theme of relationally regulated selves, which posits the essence of the lived experience of FND as responding to stressful experiences within a relational, regulatory context.

Conclusions: The prevalent themes give valuable insight into the lived experience of FND and the impact of stressors, past and present, and the relational environment in the development of and recovery from the disorder. Further research is needed to support the formulation of the patient experience and cocreated recovery pathways.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between stroke and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI): a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Study 2015-2020. Clinical data and reporting quality in NMDAR-antibody encephalitis and pregnancy: a systematic review. Correction: ICAM-1 and CRP as biomarkers of 3-month outcome in acute ischaemic stroke. Development of a diagnostic checklist to identify functional cognitive disorder versus other neurocognitive disorders. Perfusion patterns as a tool for emergency stroke diagnosis: differentiating proximal and distal MCA occlusions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1