Paracetamol prior to catheter balloon insertion for labor induction—A randomized controlled trial

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101610
Maya Frank Wolf MD , Inshirah Sgayer MD , Raneen Abu Shqara MD , Karina Naskovica MD , Fatina Kassis MA , Nataly Kushnir MA , Miri Lavinsky MA , Nasra Idilbi PhD , Lior Lowenstein MD
{"title":"Paracetamol prior to catheter balloon insertion for labor induction—A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Maya Frank Wolf MD ,&nbsp;Inshirah Sgayer MD ,&nbsp;Raneen Abu Shqara MD ,&nbsp;Karina Naskovica MD ,&nbsp;Fatina Kassis MA ,&nbsp;Nataly Kushnir MA ,&nbsp;Miri Lavinsky MA ,&nbsp;Nasra Idilbi PhD ,&nbsp;Lior Lowenstein MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Assessing maternal pain and satisfaction following administration of paracetamol vs. placebo prior to catheter balloon placement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Primiparous women at term admitted for medically-indicated labor induction were randomized to receive intravenous paracetamol 1 gram in 100cc normal saline (N=71) or placebo of 100cc normal saline (N=70) prior to catheter balloon insertion. The women were blinded to the intervention allocation. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores and maternal satisfaction, assessed via questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Pre-induction maternal pain did not differ between the paracetamol and placebo groups. Median VAS scores at 2, 30, and 60 minutes after catheter insertion were comparable between the groups: 6.46±2.77 vs. 6.66±2.78, <em>P=.</em>68; 5.53±3.20 vs. 5.93±3.01, <em>P=.</em>46; and 5.83±3.25 vs. 6.49±2.88, <em>P=.</em>26, respectively. For the paracetamol vs. placebo group, the mean sum of VAS scores was lower (4.39 vs. 5.37, <em>P=.</em>045) and the proportion with a mean VAS score &lt;5 was higher (65.2% vs. 44.1%, <em>P=.</em>016). This difference persisted in a multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for maternal age (OR=2.2, 95% CI 1.1–4.5, <em>P=.</em>036). After balloon insertion, relatively fewer women in the paracetamol vs. placebo group showed immobility (33.8% vs 50.0%, <em>P=.</em>037) and needed analgesics (31.3% vs. 66.1%, <em>P</em>&lt;.001). Maternal satisfaction score was similar between the groups (<em>P=.</em>877). Cervical ripening, duration from catheter insertion to delivery, and labor and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The administration of paracetamol compared with placebo prior to catheter balloon insertion was associated with lower VAS score and less analgesic use and maternal immobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101610"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933325000114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Assessing maternal pain and satisfaction following administration of paracetamol vs. placebo prior to catheter balloon placement.

Methods

Primiparous women at term admitted for medically-indicated labor induction were randomized to receive intravenous paracetamol 1 gram in 100cc normal saline (N=71) or placebo of 100cc normal saline (N=70) prior to catheter balloon insertion. The women were blinded to the intervention allocation. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores and maternal satisfaction, assessed via questionnaire.

Results

Pre-induction maternal pain did not differ between the paracetamol and placebo groups. Median VAS scores at 2, 30, and 60 minutes after catheter insertion were comparable between the groups: 6.46±2.77 vs. 6.66±2.78, P=.68; 5.53±3.20 vs. 5.93±3.01, P=.46; and 5.83±3.25 vs. 6.49±2.88, P=.26, respectively. For the paracetamol vs. placebo group, the mean sum of VAS scores was lower (4.39 vs. 5.37, P=.045) and the proportion with a mean VAS score <5 was higher (65.2% vs. 44.1%, P=.016). This difference persisted in a multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for maternal age (OR=2.2, 95% CI 1.1–4.5, P=.036). After balloon insertion, relatively fewer women in the paracetamol vs. placebo group showed immobility (33.8% vs 50.0%, P=.037) and needed analgesics (31.3% vs. 66.1%, P<.001). Maternal satisfaction score was similar between the groups (P=.877). Cervical ripening, duration from catheter insertion to delivery, and labor and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusions

The administration of paracetamol compared with placebo prior to catheter balloon insertion was associated with lower VAS score and less analgesic use and maternal immobility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在导尿管球囊插入引产前使用扑热息痛-一项随机对照试验:在导尿管球囊插入引产前使用扑热息痛。
背景:在导管球囊放置前,评估给药扑热息痛和安慰剂后产妇的疼痛和满意度。方法:经医学指征引产入院的足月初产妇女随机分为两组,一组在导管球囊插入前静脉注射1克扑热息痛100cc生理盐水(N=71)或100cc生理盐水安慰剂(N=70)。这些妇女对干预分配是不知情的。主要结果是视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和产妇满意度,通过问卷进行评估。结果:诱导前产妇疼痛在扑热息痛组和安慰剂组之间没有差异。两组患者在置管后2、30和60分钟的VAS评分中位数具有可比性:6.46±2.77 vs 6.66±2.78,p=0.68;5.53±3.20 vs. 5.93±3.01,p=0.46;5.83±3.25 vs. 6.49±2.88,p=0.26。对于扑热息痛组和安慰剂组,VAS评分的平均和较低(4.39比5.37,p=0.045)和平均VAS评分的比例。结论:在导管球囊插入前给予扑热息痛与安慰剂相比,VAS评分较低,镇痛药的使用和产妇不活动的减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
Comparative effectiveness of two enhanced prenatal care models on preterm birth: an exploratory analysis of the EMBRACE randomized trial Support for universal third-trimester ultrasound from risk factor–based analysis Association between partner status and postpartum depression among participants in a perinatal mental health collaborative care program Validation of a prediction model for postpartum hospital use in geogaphic contexts with greater rural representation. Time of day of induction impacts the total duration of labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1