Neurofeedback and attention modulate somatosensory alpha oscillations but not pain perception.

IF 7.2 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences PLoS Biology Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002972
Vanessa D Hohn, Laura Tiemann, Felix S Bott, Elisabeth S May, Clara Fritzen, Moritz M Nickel, Cristina Gil Ávila, Markus Ploner
{"title":"Neurofeedback and attention modulate somatosensory alpha oscillations but not pain perception.","authors":"Vanessa D Hohn, Laura Tiemann, Felix S Bott, Elisabeth S May, Clara Fritzen, Moritz M Nickel, Cristina Gil Ávila, Markus Ploner","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3002972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain is closely linked to alpha oscillations (8 < 13 Hz) which are thought to represent a supra-modal, top-down mediated gating mechanism that shapes sensory processing. Consequently, alpha oscillations might also shape the cerebral processing of nociceptive input and eventually the perception of pain. To test this mechanistic hypothesis, we designed a sham-controlled and double-blind electroencephalography (EEG)-based neurofeedback study. In a short-term neurofeedback training protocol, healthy participants learned to up- and down-regulate somatosensory alpha oscillations using attention. Subsequently, we investigated how this manipulation impacts experimental pain applied during neurofeedback. Using Bayesian statistics and mediation analysis, we aimed to test whether alpha oscillations mediate attention effects on pain perception. The results showed that attention and neurofeedback successfully up- and down-regulated the asymmetry of somatosensory alpha oscillations. However, attention and neurofeedback did not modulate pain ratings or related brain responses. Accordingly, somatosensory alpha oscillations did not mediate attention effects on pain perception. Thus, our results challenge the hypothesis that somatosensory alpha oscillations shape pain perception. A causal relationship between alpha oscillations and pain perception might not exist or be more complex than hypothesized. Trial registration: Following Stage 1 acceptance, the study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05570695.</p>","PeriodicalId":49001,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":"e3002972"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002972","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pain is closely linked to alpha oscillations (8 < 13 Hz) which are thought to represent a supra-modal, top-down mediated gating mechanism that shapes sensory processing. Consequently, alpha oscillations might also shape the cerebral processing of nociceptive input and eventually the perception of pain. To test this mechanistic hypothesis, we designed a sham-controlled and double-blind electroencephalography (EEG)-based neurofeedback study. In a short-term neurofeedback training protocol, healthy participants learned to up- and down-regulate somatosensory alpha oscillations using attention. Subsequently, we investigated how this manipulation impacts experimental pain applied during neurofeedback. Using Bayesian statistics and mediation analysis, we aimed to test whether alpha oscillations mediate attention effects on pain perception. The results showed that attention and neurofeedback successfully up- and down-regulated the asymmetry of somatosensory alpha oscillations. However, attention and neurofeedback did not modulate pain ratings or related brain responses. Accordingly, somatosensory alpha oscillations did not mediate attention effects on pain perception. Thus, our results challenge the hypothesis that somatosensory alpha oscillations shape pain perception. A causal relationship between alpha oscillations and pain perception might not exist or be more complex than hypothesized. Trial registration: Following Stage 1 acceptance, the study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05570695.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经反馈和注意调节体感α振荡,但不调节痛觉。
疼痛与α振荡(8 < 13 Hz)密切相关,α振荡被认为代表了一种超模态、自上而下介导的门控机制,形成了感觉加工。因此,α振荡也可能影响大脑对伤害性输入的处理,并最终影响对疼痛的感知。为了验证这一机制假说,我们设计了一项基于假对照和双盲脑电图(EEG)的神经反馈研究。在一个短期的神经反馈训练方案中,健康的参与者学会了利用注意力来上下调节体感α振荡。随后,我们研究了这种操作如何影响神经反馈过程中应用的实验性疼痛。利用贝叶斯统计和中介分析,我们旨在检验α振荡是否介导注意对疼痛感知的影响。结果表明,注意和神经反馈成功地上调和下调了体感α振荡的不对称性。然而,注意力和神经反馈并没有调节疼痛等级或相关的大脑反应。因此,体感α振荡并没有介导注意对疼痛感知的影响。因此,我们的结果挑战了体感α振荡塑造疼痛感知的假设。α振荡和痛觉之间的因果关系可能不存在,或者比假设的更复杂。试验注册:在第一阶段接受后,该研究在ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05570695上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Biology
PLoS Biology BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-BIOLOGY
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
359
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Biology is the flagship journal of the Public Library of Science (PLOS) and focuses on publishing groundbreaking and relevant research in all areas of biological science. The journal features works at various scales, ranging from molecules to ecosystems, and also encourages interdisciplinary studies. PLOS Biology publishes articles that demonstrate exceptional significance, originality, and relevance, with a high standard of scientific rigor in methodology, reporting, and conclusions. The journal aims to advance science and serve the research community by transforming research communication to align with the research process. It offers evolving article types and policies that empower authors to share the complete story behind their scientific findings with a diverse global audience of researchers, educators, policymakers, patient advocacy groups, and the general public. PLOS Biology, along with other PLOS journals, is widely indexed by major services such as Crossref, Dimensions, DOAJ, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, PLOS Biology is indexed by various other services including AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, BIOSYS Previews, CABI CAB Abstracts, CABI Global Health, CAPES, CAS, CNKI, Embase, Journal Guide, MEDLINE, and Zoological Record, ensuring that the research content is easily accessible and discoverable by a wide range of audiences.
期刊最新文献
TDP-43 is coming to the cottage: A new tool to study neurodegenerative diseases. Frontotemporal network interactions causally support rapid concreteness judgments during reading. Plug-and-play evolution of the Klebsiella pneumoniae capsule locus enables serotype exchange across genetic backgrounds. Three-dimensional scene boundary representations for wall orientation and distance are represented distinctly in the human visual cortex. Immersive NREM2 dreaming preserves subjective sleep depth against declining sleep pressure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1