Loneliness is positively associated with populist radical right support

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117676
Delaney Peterson , Matthijs Rooduijn , Frederic R. Hopp , Gijs Schumacher , Bert N. Bakker
{"title":"Loneliness is positively associated with populist radical right support","authors":"Delaney Peterson ,&nbsp;Matthijs Rooduijn ,&nbsp;Frederic R. Hopp ,&nbsp;Gijs Schumacher ,&nbsp;Bert N. Bakker","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The mental and physical health consequences of loneliness are well documented. However, loneliness's socio-political ramifications have been largely unexplored. We theorize that loneliness, due to its physiologically dysregulating impact on the nervous system, facilitates greater susceptibility towards populist radical right parties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We tested our hypothesis in 25 unique tests in four population-based samples (N = 40852), spanning nine countries - the Netherlands (15 tests, 2008–2023), Germany (two samples; 2017, 2018), Austria, Croatia, Denmark, France, Hungary, Sweden, and Switzerland (all in 2017). Logistic regressions were run per year and per country. Two internal meta-analyses were run, the first for the Dutch sample and the second for the cross country dataset.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the Netherlands, lonelier individuals were more likely to support the populist radical right across 15 tests spanning 15 years of data, with 11 tests reaching statistical significance - odds ratios ranging from 1.1 to 1.38. For the cross country analysis, Denmark reached statistical significance (OR = 1.2, 90% CI = 1.01, 1.42). Due to smaller sample sizes however, the cross country tests were underpowered to reliably detect small effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Loneliness is positively associated with support for the populist radical right in the Netherlands. The effect sizes are comparable to common health correlates of loneliness - high blood pressure, heart diseases, and depression – emphasizing their socio-political relevance. Going forward, well-powered cross-national replications are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117676"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500005X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The mental and physical health consequences of loneliness are well documented. However, loneliness's socio-political ramifications have been largely unexplored. We theorize that loneliness, due to its physiologically dysregulating impact on the nervous system, facilitates greater susceptibility towards populist radical right parties.

Methods

We tested our hypothesis in 25 unique tests in four population-based samples (N = 40852), spanning nine countries - the Netherlands (15 tests, 2008–2023), Germany (two samples; 2017, 2018), Austria, Croatia, Denmark, France, Hungary, Sweden, and Switzerland (all in 2017). Logistic regressions were run per year and per country. Two internal meta-analyses were run, the first for the Dutch sample and the second for the cross country dataset.

Results

In the Netherlands, lonelier individuals were more likely to support the populist radical right across 15 tests spanning 15 years of data, with 11 tests reaching statistical significance - odds ratios ranging from 1.1 to 1.38. For the cross country analysis, Denmark reached statistical significance (OR = 1.2, 90% CI = 1.01, 1.42). Due to smaller sample sizes however, the cross country tests were underpowered to reliably detect small effects.

Conclusions

Loneliness is positively associated with support for the populist radical right in the Netherlands. The effect sizes are comparable to common health correlates of loneliness - high blood pressure, heart diseases, and depression – emphasizing their socio-political relevance. Going forward, well-powered cross-national replications are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孤独与民粹主义激进右翼的支持呈正相关。
目的:孤独对身心健康的影响是有据可查的。然而,孤独的社会政治影响在很大程度上尚未得到探索。我们的理论是,孤独,由于其对神经系统的生理失调影响,使人们更容易受到民粹主义激进右翼政党的影响。方法:我们在四个基于人群的样本(N = 40852)中通过25个独特的测试来检验我们的假设,这些样本跨越9个国家-荷兰(15个测试,2008-2023),德国(2个样本;2017年,2018年),奥地利,克罗地亚,丹麦,法国,匈牙利,瑞典和瑞士(都在2017年)。每年和每个国家进行Logistic回归。进行了两次内部荟萃分析,第一次是针对荷兰样本,第二次是针对跨国数据集。结果:在荷兰,孤独感较强的人更有可能支持民粹主义激进右翼,15年的数据进行了15次测试,其中11次测试达到了统计显著性——比值比从1.1到1.38不等。对于跨国分析,丹麦达到统计学意义(OR = 1.2, 90% CI = 1.01, 1.42)。然而,由于样本量较小,越野测试无法可靠地检测到小的影响。结论:在荷兰,孤独与民粹主义激进右翼的支持呈正相关。效应大小与孤独的常见健康相关因素——高血压、心脏病和抑郁症——相当,强调了它们的社会政治相关性。展望未来,需要强大的跨国复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
What counts as need? A qualitative study exploring perceptions of sexual and reproductive health in humanitarian settings Unpacking sociopolitical determinants of suicide in networked movements: Exposure to protest suicides in Hong Kong Advancing the concept of community positive health through participatory research in marginalized communities in Kenya “I thought I could postpartum-proof my experience”: Embodying, resisting, and negotiating medicalization online Synergies of participatory mapping and health geography: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1