Exploring online patient-doctor interactions. An epistemic and pragmatic analysis of Q&A patterns in an Italian “Ask to the doctor” medical forum

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2025.108662
Ramona Bongelli , Alessia Bertolazzi , Marina Paolanti , Ilaria Riccioni
{"title":"Exploring online patient-doctor interactions. An epistemic and pragmatic analysis of Q&A patterns in an Italian “Ask to the doctor” medical forum","authors":"Ramona Bongelli ,&nbsp;Alessia Bertolazzi ,&nbsp;Marina Paolanti ,&nbsp;Ilaria Riccioni","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2025.108662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The main objective of this research is to investigate the epistemic and pragmatic management of patient-doctor interactions in Italian online health communities. To achieve this goal, an advanced web scraping methodology was used to extract from an Italian Q&amp;A service (within the healthcare platforms, <em>Il Mio Dottore</em>) 200 pairs of questions and answers concerning two pathological conditions: anxiety and hypothyroidism. We first tagged the two sub-corpora and analyzed them both quantitatively and qualitatively to establish (i) what types of questions were used by patients, and what epistemic attitude and pragmatic function they convey; (ii) whether doctors’ replies were aligned or not; (iii) whether there were differences between the two sub-corpora. The results revealed many similarities between the two sub-corpora, but also some differences, mainly concerning doctors’ response patterns, with a tendency towards misalignment more pronounced in the anxiety sub-corpus. The practical implications of this and similar research may be numerous. First, they can improve understanding of the epistemic and pragmatic dynamics at play in Q&amp;A services. Secondly, such knowledge can be used to formulate practical recommendations to foster better alignment with patients, thereby improving their engagement. Finally, this knowledge can guide the development of chatbot design guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 108662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399125000291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of this research is to investigate the epistemic and pragmatic management of patient-doctor interactions in Italian online health communities. To achieve this goal, an advanced web scraping methodology was used to extract from an Italian Q&A service (within the healthcare platforms, Il Mio Dottore) 200 pairs of questions and answers concerning two pathological conditions: anxiety and hypothyroidism. We first tagged the two sub-corpora and analyzed them both quantitatively and qualitatively to establish (i) what types of questions were used by patients, and what epistemic attitude and pragmatic function they convey; (ii) whether doctors’ replies were aligned or not; (iii) whether there were differences between the two sub-corpora. The results revealed many similarities between the two sub-corpora, but also some differences, mainly concerning doctors’ response patterns, with a tendency towards misalignment more pronounced in the anxiety sub-corpus. The practical implications of this and similar research may be numerous. First, they can improve understanding of the epistemic and pragmatic dynamics at play in Q&A services. Secondly, such knowledge can be used to formulate practical recommendations to foster better alignment with patients, thereby improving their engagement. Finally, this knowledge can guide the development of chatbot design guidelines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索线上医患互动。意大利“问医生”医学论坛问答模式的认识论和语用分析。
本研究的主要目的是调查意大利在线健康社区中医患互动的认知和实用管理。为了实现这一目标,我们使用了一种先进的网络抓取方法,从意大利问答服务(在医疗保健平台Il Mio Dottore内)中提取了200对关于两种病理状况的问题和答案:焦虑和甲状腺功能减退。我们首先标记了两个子语料库,并对它们进行了定量和定性分析,以确定(i)患者使用了什么类型的问题,以及它们传达了什么样的认知态度和语用功能;(ii)医生的答复是否一致;(iii)两个子语料库之间是否存在差异。结果显示,两个亚语料库之间有许多相似之处,但也有一些差异,主要涉及医生的反应模式,其中焦虑亚语料库的偏差倾向更为明显。这项研究和类似研究的实际意义可能是很多的。首先,它们可以提高对问答服务中起作用的认知和语用动态的理解。其次,这些知识可以用来制定实用的建议,以促进更好地与患者保持一致,从而提高他们的参与度。最后,这些知识可以指导聊天机器人的开发设计指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
期刊最新文献
Podcast-based patient preparation: Enhanced efficiency or constrained dialogue? ‘There is no need to worry’: How general practitioners integrate patient concerns into the shared decision-making dialogue Handling communication challenges at the emergency department entry: Insights from a Belgian hospital Patient-oriented navigation in stroke and lung cancer patients: Results on feasibility and efficacy of two randomized controlled trials in Germany Systematic review of the association between genetic/genomic literacy and testing decisions: Limited evidence and a need for standardized research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1