Analysis of the Auditory-Perceptual Voice Quality in Older and Younger Adults Without Self-Reported Voice Complaints.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.12.022
Elif Tunç Songur, Merve Hafizoğlu, Fatma Esen Aydinli, Önal İncebay, Mününe Merve Parlak, Cafer Balci
{"title":"Analysis of the Auditory-Perceptual Voice Quality in Older and Younger Adults Without Self-Reported Voice Complaints.","authors":"Elif Tunç Songur, Merve Hafizoğlu, Fatma Esen Aydinli, Önal İncebay, Mününe Merve Parlak, Cafer Balci","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to compare the auditory perceptual voice quality in young and older adults who had no self-reported voice complaints and to investigate the relationship of voice quality with age and gender in older adults.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 114 participants. The study group comprised 57 older adults (24 men, 33 women) with a mean age of 72.6 ± 0.76 years, while the control group included 57 young adults matched by gender. All participants reported no voice complaints and scored less than 19 points on the Voice Handicap Index. Clinicians applied the GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain) auditory perceptual assessment protocol to evaluate the voice quality of the participants of the study and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than half of the study group (50.9%) were rated as having mild voice abnormality (G1) based on the GRBAS auditory perceptual assessment protocol, while 21.1% exhibited moderate (G2). In contrast, only 19.3% of the control group participants had mild voice abnormality. The study group demonstrated statistically worse voice quality compared to the control group. Furthermore, participants over 75 years of age had statistically higher G ratings compared to those under 75. No significant difference was found between the G category and gender in older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study's findings indicate that compared to younger adults, older adults perceive voice quality deviation less than clinicians do. Furthermore, it is found that the deviation in voice quality among older adults was influenced by age but not by gender. This study highlights the need for screening and early identification/prevention of voice disorders in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.12.022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to compare the auditory perceptual voice quality in young and older adults who had no self-reported voice complaints and to investigate the relationship of voice quality with age and gender in older adults.

Study design: This is a retrospective study.

Materials and methods: This study included 114 participants. The study group comprised 57 older adults (24 men, 33 women) with a mean age of 72.6 ± 0.76 years, while the control group included 57 young adults matched by gender. All participants reported no voice complaints and scored less than 19 points on the Voice Handicap Index. Clinicians applied the GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain) auditory perceptual assessment protocol to evaluate the voice quality of the participants of the study and control groups.

Results: More than half of the study group (50.9%) were rated as having mild voice abnormality (G1) based on the GRBAS auditory perceptual assessment protocol, while 21.1% exhibited moderate (G2). In contrast, only 19.3% of the control group participants had mild voice abnormality. The study group demonstrated statistically worse voice quality compared to the control group. Furthermore, participants over 75 years of age had statistically higher G ratings compared to those under 75. No significant difference was found between the G category and gender in older adults.

Conclusions: The present study's findings indicate that compared to younger adults, older adults perceive voice quality deviation less than clinicians do. Furthermore, it is found that the deviation in voice quality among older adults was influenced by age but not by gender. This study highlights the need for screening and early identification/prevention of voice disorders in older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无自述声音抱怨的老年人和年轻人的听觉感知语音质量分析。
目的:本研究的目的是比较没有自我报告声音抱怨的年轻人和老年人的听觉感知语音质量,并调查老年人语音质量与年龄和性别的关系。研究设计:这是一项回顾性研究。材料与方法:本研究纳入114名受试者。研究组包括57名老年人(24名男性,33名女性),平均年龄为72.6±0.76岁,对照组包括57名按性别匹配的年轻人。所有参与者都没有声音抱怨,并且在声音障碍指数上得分低于19分。临床医生采用GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain)听觉感知评估方案来评估研究组和对照组参与者的语音质量。结果:根据GRBAS听觉感知评估方案,超过一半(50.9%)的研究组被评为轻度语音异常(G1), 21.1%的研究组被评为中度(G2)。相比之下,对照组中只有19.3%的参与者有轻微的声音异常。与对照组相比,研究组在统计上表现出更差的语音质量。此外,与75岁以下的参与者相比,75岁以上的参与者的G级评分在统计上更高。老年人G类和性别间无显著差异。结论:本研究结果表明,与年轻人相比,老年人对语音质量偏差的感知程度低于临床医生。此外,我们发现老年人的语音质量偏差受年龄的影响,而不受性别的影响。这项研究强调了筛查和早期识别/预防老年人声音障碍的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Acoustic Parameters of the Voice in the Polish Population: Normative Values Based on MDVP Tests. Self-Oscillating Vocal Fold Models Coupled to 3D-Printed Vocal Tracts, Part II: Aerodynamics and Kinematics with and without Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract (SOVT) Tubes at Constant Low-Flow Conditions. Dysphonia in Cisgender-Females Secondary to Testosterone Therapy. Comparison of Auditory Perceptual Ratings Between Australian and Cantonese Listeners on Normal and Disordered Voices. Self-Oscillating Vocal Fold Models Coupled to 3D-Printed Vocal Tracts, Part I: Aerodynamic Threshold Measures with Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract (SOVT) Tubes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1