Effectiveness of Oral Prophylactic Antibiotics for Diagnostic Bronchoscopy: A Nationwide Database Study.

Tomohiro Akaba, Taisuke Jo, Jun Suzuki, Yuya Kimura, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Etsuko Tagaya, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"Effectiveness of Oral Prophylactic Antibiotics for Diagnostic Bronchoscopy: A Nationwide Database Study.","authors":"Tomohiro Akaba, Taisuke Jo, Jun Suzuki, Yuya Kimura, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Etsuko Tagaya, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-796OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Although guidelines generally omit routine antibiotic prophylaxis for diagnostic bronchoscopy, this recommendation is based primarily on studies with relatively small sample sizes conducted at single institutions. Moreover, the applicability of recent technical and procedural advances to these guidelines remains uncertain. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate whether oral prophylactic antibiotic administration for diagnostic bronchoscopy reduces postbronchoscopy infections among noninfectious diseases in the current setting. <b>Methods:</b> Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national inpatient database in Japan, we identified patients who underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy with or without oral prophylactic antibiotics between April 2020 and March 2022. We used propensity score-stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting and instrumental variable analyses to compare postbronchoscopy infections between the groups. Stratified analyses were also conducted on the basis of patient profiles and antibiotic types. <b>Results:</b> A total of 68,660 eligible patients were divided into prophylaxis (<i>n</i> = 10,426) and no-prophylaxis (<i>n</i> = 58,234) groups. Post-bronchoscopy infections were observed in 612 patients (0.89%). The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis showed that the prophylactic group was significantly associated with a decrease in postbronchoscopy infections (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.80). The instrumental variable analysis showed similar results (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.74). Oral antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with reduction in postbronchoscopy infection in patients who were older than 70 years, underwent bronchoscopy for malignancy, underwent biopsy or bronchoalveolar lavage, or received aminopenicillin or fluoroquinolone for prophylaxis. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest a potential role for prophylactic antibiotics in reducing postbronchoscopy infections among noninfectious patients. Although prophylactic antibiotics may help prevent these infections, their use should be carefully considered in relation to individual patient profiles and the specific antibiotics being administered.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"707-714"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202407-796OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Although guidelines generally omit routine antibiotic prophylaxis for diagnostic bronchoscopy, this recommendation is based primarily on studies with relatively small sample sizes conducted at single institutions. Moreover, the applicability of recent technical and procedural advances to these guidelines remains uncertain. Objectives: To evaluate whether oral prophylactic antibiotic administration for diagnostic bronchoscopy reduces postbronchoscopy infections among noninfectious diseases in the current setting. Methods: Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national inpatient database in Japan, we identified patients who underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy with or without oral prophylactic antibiotics between April 2020 and March 2022. We used propensity score-stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting and instrumental variable analyses to compare postbronchoscopy infections between the groups. Stratified analyses were also conducted on the basis of patient profiles and antibiotic types. Results: A total of 68,660 eligible patients were divided into prophylaxis (n = 10,426) and no-prophylaxis (n = 58,234) groups. Post-bronchoscopy infections were observed in 612 patients (0.89%). The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis showed that the prophylactic group was significantly associated with a decrease in postbronchoscopy infections (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.80). The instrumental variable analysis showed similar results (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.74). Oral antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with reduction in postbronchoscopy infection in patients who were older than 70 years, underwent bronchoscopy for malignancy, underwent biopsy or bronchoalveolar lavage, or received aminopenicillin or fluoroquinolone for prophylaxis. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a potential role for prophylactic antibiotics in reducing postbronchoscopy infections among noninfectious patients. Although prophylactic antibiotics may help prevent these infections, their use should be carefully considered in relation to individual patient profiles and the specific antibiotics being administered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服预防性抗生素在支气管镜诊断中的有效性:一项全国性数据库研究。
理由:尽管指南通常省略了诊断性支气管镜检查的常规抗生素预防,但该建议主要基于在单个机构进行的相对较小样本量的研究。此外,最近的技术和程序进展是否适用于这些准则仍不确定。目的:评价诊断性支气管镜下口服预防性抗生素是否能减少非感染性疾病的支气管镜后感染。方法:使用诊断程序组合数据库(日本的国家住院患者数据库),我们确定了在2020年4月至2022年3月期间接受或不接受口服预防性抗生素的诊断性支气管镜检查的患者。我们采用倾向评分稳定的治疗加权逆概率和工具变量分析来比较两组之间的支气管镜检查后感染。还根据患者资料和抗生素类型进行了分层分析。结果:68660例符合条件的患者被分为预防组(N= 10426)和不预防组(N= 58234)。支气管镜检查后感染612例(0.89%)。治疗加权分析的稳定逆概率显示,预防组与支气管镜检查后感染的减少显著相关(优势比,0.60;95%置信区间,0.45 ~ 0.80)。工具变量分析显示相似的结果(优势比,0.50;95%置信区间为0.34-0.74)。对于年龄大于70岁、因恶性肿瘤接受支气管镜检查、活检或支气管肺泡灌洗、或接受氨基青霉素或氟喹诺酮预防治疗的患者,口服抗生素预防与支气管镜检查后感染的减少相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明预防性抗生素在减少非感染性病例的支气管镜检查后感染方面具有潜在作用。虽然预防性抗生素可能有助于预防这些感染,但应根据个别患者的情况和正在使用的特定抗生素仔细考虑其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Pulmonary Inferno: The Triad of Interstitial Abnormalities, Emphysema, and Lung Cancer. Waveform data capture substantial variation in tidal volume and other respiratory parameters. Disease Modification and Progression in Pre-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report. Rural-Urban Patterns in Household Rules Limiting Combustible Tobacco, Noncombustible Tobacco, and E-Cigarette Use. Gabapentinoids and Risk for Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1