Predictors of implant failure: A comprehensive analysis of risk factors in oral implant restoration for patients with partial defects of dentition.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomolecules & biomedicine Pub Date : 2025-05-08 DOI:10.17305/bb.2024.11668
Dake Linghu, Danna Zhang, Min Liu
{"title":"Predictors of implant failure: A comprehensive analysis of risk factors in oral implant restoration for patients with partial defects of dentition.","authors":"Dake Linghu, Danna Zhang, Min Liu","doi":"10.17305/bb.2024.11668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implant failure remains a significant challenge in oral implantology, necessitating a deeper understanding of its risk factors to improve treatment outcomes. This study aimed to enhance the clinical outcomes of oral implant restoration by investigating the factors contributing to implant failure in patients with partial dentition defects within two years of treatment. Additionally, the study sought to develop an early risk prediction model for implant failure. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 300 patients with partial dentition defects, dividing them into two groups: a failed implant group and a successful implant group, based on the occurrence of implant failure within two years. General clinical data and condition-specific clinical information were compared between the groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify influencing factors, while the predictive effectiveness of the model was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The analysis revealed that factors, such as gender, post-implant smoking, oral hygiene status at the second-year follow-up, tooth position, number of implants, timing of loading, width of keratinized mucosa, and bone quantity significantly influenced the likelihood of implant failure (P < 0.05). Among these, post-implant smoking and tooth position were identified as independent risk factors. The area under the curve (AUC) for tooth position was 0.695, indicating low predictive performance. Although tooth position was determined to be an independent risk factor for implant failure within two years, its predictive performance was limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"1581-1590"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2024.11668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implant failure remains a significant challenge in oral implantology, necessitating a deeper understanding of its risk factors to improve treatment outcomes. This study aimed to enhance the clinical outcomes of oral implant restoration by investigating the factors contributing to implant failure in patients with partial dentition defects within two years of treatment. Additionally, the study sought to develop an early risk prediction model for implant failure. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 300 patients with partial dentition defects, dividing them into two groups: a failed implant group and a successful implant group, based on the occurrence of implant failure within two years. General clinical data and condition-specific clinical information were compared between the groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify influencing factors, while the predictive effectiveness of the model was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The analysis revealed that factors, such as gender, post-implant smoking, oral hygiene status at the second-year follow-up, tooth position, number of implants, timing of loading, width of keratinized mucosa, and bone quantity significantly influenced the likelihood of implant failure (P < 0.05). Among these, post-implant smoking and tooth position were identified as independent risk factors. The area under the curve (AUC) for tooth position was 0.695, indicating low predictive performance. Although tooth position was determined to be an independent risk factor for implant failure within two years, its predictive performance was limited.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植体失败的预测因素:牙列部分缺损患者口腔种植体修复的危险因素综合分析。
种植体失败仍然是口腔种植学的一个重大挑战,需要更深入地了解其危险因素以改善治疗效果。本研究旨在通过研究部分牙列缺损患者在治疗两年内导致种植体失败的因素,提高口腔种植体修复的临床效果。此外,该研究试图建立种植体失败的早期风险预测模型。回顾性分析300例牙列部分缺损患者,根据两年内种植体失败的发生情况,将其分为种植失败组和种植成功组。比较两组间的一般临床资料和特定疾病的临床资料。采用多元二元logistic回归分析确定影响因素,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估模型的预测有效性。分析发现,性别、种植后吸烟、随访第二年口腔卫生状况、牙位、种植体数量、加载时间、角质化黏膜宽度、骨量等因素对种植失败的可能性有显著影响(P < 0.05)。其中,种植后吸烟和牙齿位置被认为是独立的危险因素。牙位曲线下面积(AUC)为0.695,预测效果较差。虽然牙位被确定为两年内种植体失败的独立危险因素,但其预测性能有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preoperative GNRI and surgical site infection risk after total joint arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tumor microenvironment and key signaling pathways in breast cancer progression and therapy resistance: A review. Circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer: Post-hoc analysis of treatment response and survival outcomes in the ALTER-C-002 study. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies M2-like macrophage polarization associated with mesenchymal stem cell treatment in a murine sepsis model. Salivary and urinary microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers of minimal residual disease in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1