Knowledge, perceptions, facilitators, and barriers towards asthma self-management among patients: A systematic review of the literature

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100558
Saba Alyas , Rabia Hussain , Bayan Faisal Ababneh , Siew Chin Ong , Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
{"title":"Knowledge, perceptions, facilitators, and barriers towards asthma self-management among patients: A systematic review of the literature","authors":"Saba Alyas ,&nbsp;Rabia Hussain ,&nbsp;Bayan Faisal Ababneh ,&nbsp;Siew Chin Ong ,&nbsp;Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Asthma self-management is an effective approach that empowers patients with asthma to control their condition and reduce its impact on their daily lives.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence regarding the knowledge, perceptions, facilitators, and barriers related to asthma self-management among patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted across five databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) using specific key terms. Studies that reported knowledge, perceptions, facilitators and barriers towards asthma self-management were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to report this review. All the data from included studies were analyzed through narrative synthesis approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 17 studies were included in this review. The findings indicated that most patients had inadequate knowledge of asthma self-management, particularly regarding asthma fundamentals, and inhaler techniques. Patients' cultural beliefs, and perceived social stigma influenced their self-management practices. Facilitators of asthma self-management included strong partnerships with healthcare providers, social support, access to medication, and having a written asthma action plan. Conversely, poor communication with healthcare professionals, travel, smoking, and workplace challenges were identified as barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a pressing need for education and training programs to enhance understanding of the disease, and inhaler technique in patients with asthma. Healthcare professionals should create tailored asthma action plans according to patients' beliefs and needs. Moreover, healthcare policies should be developed to promote facilitators and address barriers, to ensure effective asthma management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Asthma self-management is an effective approach that empowers patients with asthma to control their condition and reduce its impact on their daily lives.

Objective

This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence regarding the knowledge, perceptions, facilitators, and barriers related to asthma self-management among patients.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted across five databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) using specific key terms. Studies that reported knowledge, perceptions, facilitators and barriers towards asthma self-management were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to report this review. All the data from included studies were analyzed through narrative synthesis approach.

Results

A total of 17 studies were included in this review. The findings indicated that most patients had inadequate knowledge of asthma self-management, particularly regarding asthma fundamentals, and inhaler techniques. Patients' cultural beliefs, and perceived social stigma influenced their self-management practices. Facilitators of asthma self-management included strong partnerships with healthcare providers, social support, access to medication, and having a written asthma action plan. Conversely, poor communication with healthcare professionals, travel, smoking, and workplace challenges were identified as barriers.

Conclusion

There is a pressing need for education and training programs to enhance understanding of the disease, and inhaler technique in patients with asthma. Healthcare professionals should create tailored asthma action plans according to patients' beliefs and needs. Moreover, healthcare policies should be developed to promote facilitators and address barriers, to ensure effective asthma management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者哮喘自我管理的知识、认知、促进因素和障碍:文献的系统回顾。
背景:哮喘自我管理是一种有效的方法,使哮喘患者能够控制病情,减少其对日常生活的影响。目的:本系统综述旨在综合有关哮喘患者自我管理的知识、认知、促进因素和障碍的证据。方法:采用特定的关键词对PubMed、Science Direct、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar等5个数据库进行系统的文献检索。包括报告哮喘自我管理的知识、观念、促进因素和障碍的研究。按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南报告本综述。所有纳入研究的数据均采用叙事综合方法进行分析。结果:本综述共纳入17项研究。研究结果表明,大多数患者对哮喘自我管理的知识不足,特别是关于哮喘基础知识和吸入器技术。患者的文化信仰和感知到的社会耻辱影响了他们的自我管理实践。促进哮喘自我管理的因素包括与卫生保健提供者建立强有力的伙伴关系、社会支持、获得药物以及制定书面哮喘行动计划。相反,与医疗保健专业人员沟通不畅、旅行、吸烟和工作场所挑战被认为是障碍。结论:迫切需要开展教育和培训计划,以提高哮喘患者对疾病和吸入器技术的了解。医疗保健专业人员应根据患者的信念和需求制定量身定制的哮喘行动计划。此外,应制定卫生保健政策,促进促进和解决障碍,以确保有效的哮喘管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Potential clinical impact of pharmaceutical interventions in an interprofessional medication management program Pharmacy robberies and occupational safety risks: A national cross-sectional study of community pharmacies Understanding the mediating role of pharmaceutical policymaking attitudes between personal attributes and public service motivation Identifying and measuring important outcomes for evaluating the impact of pharmacist prescribing in Ireland: A modified Delphi study Assessing safety trends of withdrawn medications: A data-driven pharmacovigilance approach using growth models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1