Improving benign paroxysmal positional vertigo management in the emergency department: A longitudinal study post-GRACE-3.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1111/acem.15115
Camille Gerlier, Linda Mehenni, Gilles Chatellier, Marine Cachanado, Olivier Ganansia
{"title":"Improving benign paroxysmal positional vertigo management in the emergency department: A longitudinal study post-GRACE-3.","authors":"Camille Gerlier, Linda Mehenni, Gilles Chatellier, Marine Cachanado, Olivier Ganansia","doi":"10.1111/acem.15115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertigo is a priority for training and decision support in emergency departments (ED). Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), though manageable at bedside, remains frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. This study assessed the effectiveness of a two-tiered educational intervention on posterior and horizontal BPPV management in the ED setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal program evaluation study conducted over a year in a French ED, following GRACE-3 guidelines, involving patients with triggered episodic vestibular syndrome or brief vertigo without nystagmus. Two 6-month periods were compared: before (control cohort) and after (intervention cohort) an educational intervention of standardized training and an online decision support tool. The primary outcome was the prevalence of evidence-based BPPV diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 382 patients included, 166 were in the control cohort (43.5%) and 216 were in the intervention cohort (56.5%). The intervention cohort had a higher rate of evidence-based BPPV diagnoses compared to the control cohort (38.0% vs. 16.9%), with an effect size of 21.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.5-29.6, p < 0.0001). Canalith repositioning maneuvers were performed more frequently in the intervention cohort (90.2% vs. 57.7%), with an effect size of 33.1 (95% CI 13.2-53.1). Posttreatment tests showed a nonsignificant difference of 79.5% of intervention cohort patients testing negative versus 75.0% in the control cohort. ED length of stay was shorter in the intervention cohort (137 min vs. 247 min), with an effect size of -109.5 (95% CI -154.0 to -65.0). ED revisits within 1 month were similar (2.3% vs. 1.2%). During the intervention period, clinicians' satisfaction was correlated with the effectiveness of their clinical management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A standardized educational intervention demonstrated enhancing BPPV screening and improved evidence-based diagnosis, showing promise of more efficient treatment in the ED. Further multicenter studies are warranted to evaluate impacts on patient-reported outcomes and resource optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"739-747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vertigo is a priority for training and decision support in emergency departments (ED). Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), though manageable at bedside, remains frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. This study assessed the effectiveness of a two-tiered educational intervention on posterior and horizontal BPPV management in the ED setting.

Methods: Longitudinal program evaluation study conducted over a year in a French ED, following GRACE-3 guidelines, involving patients with triggered episodic vestibular syndrome or brief vertigo without nystagmus. Two 6-month periods were compared: before (control cohort) and after (intervention cohort) an educational intervention of standardized training and an online decision support tool. The primary outcome was the prevalence of evidence-based BPPV diagnoses.

Results: Of the 382 patients included, 166 were in the control cohort (43.5%) and 216 were in the intervention cohort (56.5%). The intervention cohort had a higher rate of evidence-based BPPV diagnoses compared to the control cohort (38.0% vs. 16.9%), with an effect size of 21.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.5-29.6, p < 0.0001). Canalith repositioning maneuvers were performed more frequently in the intervention cohort (90.2% vs. 57.7%), with an effect size of 33.1 (95% CI 13.2-53.1). Posttreatment tests showed a nonsignificant difference of 79.5% of intervention cohort patients testing negative versus 75.0% in the control cohort. ED length of stay was shorter in the intervention cohort (137 min vs. 247 min), with an effect size of -109.5 (95% CI -154.0 to -65.0). ED revisits within 1 month were similar (2.3% vs. 1.2%). During the intervention period, clinicians' satisfaction was correlated with the effectiveness of their clinical management.

Conclusions: A standardized educational intervention demonstrated enhancing BPPV screening and improved evidence-based diagnosis, showing promise of more efficient treatment in the ED. Further multicenter studies are warranted to evaluate impacts on patient-reported outcomes and resource optimization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善急诊科良性阵发性体位性眩晕的管理:grace -3后的纵向研究
背景:眩晕是急诊科(ED)培训和决策支持的重点。良性阵发性体位性眩晕(BPPV)虽然在床边可以控制,但仍然经常被误诊和治疗不足。本研究评估了两层教育干预在急诊科后路和水平BPPV管理中的有效性。方法:在法国急诊科进行了一年多的纵向项目评估研究,遵循GRACE-3指南,涉及触发性发作性前庭综合征或无眼球震颤的短暂眩晕患者。比较两个为期6个月的时间段:在标准化培训和在线决策支持工具的教育干预之前(对照队列)和之后(干预队列)。主要结局是基于证据的BPPV诊断的患病率。结果:纳入的382例患者中,对照组166例(43.5%),干预组216例(56.5%)。干预组的BPPV循证诊出率高于对照组(38.0% vs. 16.9%),效应值为21.1(95%置信区间[CI] 11.5-29.6, p)。结论:标准化教育干预增强了BPPV筛查,改善了循证诊断,显示出ED治疗更有效的希望。需要进一步的多中心研究来评估对患者报告结果和资源优化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Needle of Death Thromboelastography Tracings in Severely Bleeding Trauma Patients: A Novel Predictor of Hemorrhagic Blood Failure and Futile Resuscitation? Comment on "Point-of-Care Respiratory Diagnosis and Antibiotic Utilization in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Evaluation of Multiplex PCR". Beyond Right and Wrong: The Diagnostic Calibration Matrix and Decision Latitude as a Tiered Framework for Evaluating Diagnostic Reasoning. Financial Compensation of Academic Emergency Medicine Physicians in the United States. Caring for Mom: A Train Station Meditation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1