Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair with Suture Tape Augmentation Can Yield Good Midterm Clinical Outcomes Regardless of Skeletal Maturity and Joint Laxity.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Biomimetics Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.3390/biomimetics10010065
Shinichiro Takada, Hirotaka Nakashima, Keisuke Nakayama, Soshi Uchida
{"title":"Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair with Suture Tape Augmentation Can Yield Good Midterm Clinical Outcomes Regardless of Skeletal Maturity and Joint Laxity.","authors":"Shinichiro Takada, Hirotaka Nakashima, Keisuke Nakayama, Soshi Uchida","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics10010065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While several studies have reported short-term clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair with suture tape augmentation, there is still a dearth of knowledge regarding midterm clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation in patients with patellar dislocation. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who underwent MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation for at least one episode of patellar dislocation between 2015 and 2020. Patient-reported clinical outcomes (PROs) were evaluated via the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). In total, 17 knees (4 males and 13 females) who underwent MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation with a mean follow-up of 54.6 ± 19.5 months were included in this study. PROs significantly improved from preoperatively to the final follow-up (IKDC score: 50.7 ± 26.6 vs. 88.8 ± 13.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001; KOOS: 68.8 ± 23.3 vs. 91.2 ± 8.4, <i>p</i> = 0.011) without reducing the patient's activity level at the final follow-up (UCLA AS score: 7.9 ± 2.4 at preinjury vs. 7.9 ± 2.2 at the final follow-up, <i>p</i> = 0.655). Subgroup analysis revealed good postoperative outcomes, regardless of the patient's skeletal maturity or the presence or absence of generalized laxity. In conclusion, MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation is a safe and effective treatment for midterm follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10010065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While several studies have reported short-term clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair with suture tape augmentation, there is still a dearth of knowledge regarding midterm clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation in patients with patellar dislocation. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who underwent MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation for at least one episode of patellar dislocation between 2015 and 2020. Patient-reported clinical outcomes (PROs) were evaluated via the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). In total, 17 knees (4 males and 13 females) who underwent MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation with a mean follow-up of 54.6 ± 19.5 months were included in this study. PROs significantly improved from preoperatively to the final follow-up (IKDC score: 50.7 ± 26.6 vs. 88.8 ± 13.0, p < 0.001; KOOS: 68.8 ± 23.3 vs. 91.2 ± 8.4, p = 0.011) without reducing the patient's activity level at the final follow-up (UCLA AS score: 7.9 ± 2.4 at preinjury vs. 7.9 ± 2.2 at the final follow-up, p = 0.655). Subgroup analysis revealed good postoperative outcomes, regardless of the patient's skeletal maturity or the presence or absence of generalized laxity. In conclusion, MPFL repair with suture tape augmentation is a safe and effective treatment for midterm follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无论骨骼成熟度和关节松弛程度如何,缝合带增强髌股韧带内侧修复术都能产生良好的中期临床结果。
虽然有几项研究报道了缝线带增强髌股内侧韧带(MPFL)修复后的短期临床结果,但关于中期临床结果的知识仍然缺乏。本研究旨在评估缝合带增强修复髌骨脱位患者的MPFL的中期临床结果。我们回顾性回顾了2015年至2020年间至少一次髌骨脱位的MPFL缝合带增强修复患者的临床记录。通过国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分和膝关节损伤骨关节炎结局评分(oos)评估患者报告的临床结局(PROs)。本研究共纳入17例膝关节(男4例,女13例),采用缝合带增强法修复MPFL,平均随访时间为54.6±19.5个月。从术前到最终随访,PROs显著改善(IKDC评分:50.7±26.6比88.8±13.0,p < 0.001;KOOS: 68.8±23.3 vs. 91.2±8.4,p = 0.011),且未降低患者最终随访时的活动水平(UCLA AS评分:损伤前7.9±2.4 vs.最终随访时7.9±2.2,p = 0.655)。亚组分析显示,无论患者的骨骼成熟度或有无全身性松弛,术后结果都很好。结论:在中期随访中,缝合带修复是一种安全有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomimetics
Biomimetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Topology and Size Optimization of Trusses by Bone Remodeling: Primary Force-Based Approach. A Dynamic Multi-Niche Biogeography-Based Optimization Algorithm and Its Application to Robot Path Planning. Challenging the Biomimetic Promise 2.0: Negative Spillover of Bio-Inspired Versus Sustainability Framing on Public Perceptions of Bio-Inspired Technologies. Chaos-Embedded Multi-Objective Intelligent Optimization-Based Explainable Classification Model for Determining Cherry Fruit Fly Infestation Levels Using Pomological Data. Biomimetic Dual-Strategy Adaptive Differential Evolution for Joint Kinematic-Residual Calibration with a Neuro-Physical Hybrid Jacobian.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1