{"title":"Impact of Bone-Modifying Agents on Post-Bone Metastasis Survival Across Cancer Types.","authors":"Hironari Tamiya, Kazumi Nishino, Yuji Kato, Reina Nakahashi-Kato, Yurika Kosuga-Tsujimoto, Shota Kinoshita, Rie Suzuki, Makiyo Watanabe, Toru Wakamatsu, Shigeki Kakunaga, Satoshi Takenaka","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32010042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis. Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are commonly used for the prevention or treatment of skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with bone metastasis; however, whether or not treatment with BMA improves survival remains unclear. In this study, we investigated whether BMA was involved in post-bone metastasis survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 539 cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed to identify significant independent factors in post-bone metastasis survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the overall population, patients with the following cancers had a median survival longer than 24 months: thyroid, 97.2 months; breast, 51.5 months; prostate, 47.2 months; and kidney, 38.8 months. In contrast, median post-bone metastasis survival was significantly shorter in gastrointestinal (GI) (6.5 months), head and neck (6.3 months), and urinary tract (3.4 months) cancers. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the log-rank test demonstrated that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was a significant factor for post-bone metastasis survival: EGFR mutation (-) <i>n</i> = 67, median post-bone metastasis survival 11.5 months (95% CI: 6.0-15.2); EGFR mutation (+) <i>n</i> = 39, median post-bone metastasis survival 28.8 months (95% CI: 18.1-35.7) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Intriguingly, treatment with BMA was a significant positive prognostic factor: BMA (-) <i>n</i> = 203, median post-bone metastasis survival 7.8 months (95% CI: 5.8-12.5); BMA (+) <i>n</i> = 336, median post-bone metastasis survival 21.9 months (95% CI: 16.1-26.4) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Moreover, the Cox proportional hazards model showed that this was particularly evident in cancer types with poor prognosis such as GI cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.40-0.95; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and NSCLC without the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.91; <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with BMA is recommended not only for the prevention and/or treatment of SRE, but also may have a positive impact on post-bone metastasis survival, particularly in cancers with typically poor post-bone metastasis survival such as GI cancer and NSCLC without the EGFR mutation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32010042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bone metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis. Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are commonly used for the prevention or treatment of skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with bone metastasis; however, whether or not treatment with BMA improves survival remains unclear. In this study, we investigated whether BMA was involved in post-bone metastasis survival.
Methods: A total of 539 cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed to identify significant independent factors in post-bone metastasis survival.
Results: Among the overall population, patients with the following cancers had a median survival longer than 24 months: thyroid, 97.2 months; breast, 51.5 months; prostate, 47.2 months; and kidney, 38.8 months. In contrast, median post-bone metastasis survival was significantly shorter in gastrointestinal (GI) (6.5 months), head and neck (6.3 months), and urinary tract (3.4 months) cancers. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the log-rank test demonstrated that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was a significant factor for post-bone metastasis survival: EGFR mutation (-) n = 67, median post-bone metastasis survival 11.5 months (95% CI: 6.0-15.2); EGFR mutation (+) n = 39, median post-bone metastasis survival 28.8 months (95% CI: 18.1-35.7) (p < 0.05). Intriguingly, treatment with BMA was a significant positive prognostic factor: BMA (-) n = 203, median post-bone metastasis survival 7.8 months (95% CI: 5.8-12.5); BMA (+) n = 336, median post-bone metastasis survival 21.9 months (95% CI: 16.1-26.4) (p < 0.001). Moreover, the Cox proportional hazards model showed that this was particularly evident in cancer types with poor prognosis such as GI cancer (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.40-0.95; p < 0.05) and NSCLC without the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.91; p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Treatment with BMA is recommended not only for the prevention and/or treatment of SRE, but also may have a positive impact on post-bone metastasis survival, particularly in cancers with typically poor post-bone metastasis survival such as GI cancer and NSCLC without the EGFR mutation.
期刊介绍:
Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease.
We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.