Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Related to Lymphadenectomy in Clinical Stage I NSCLC: A Multicenter Retrospective Experience.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.3390/curroncol32010031
Beatrice Manfredini, Carmelina Cristina Zirafa, Alessandro Stefani, Gaetano Romano, Greta Alì, Riccardo Morganti, Ilaria Ceccarelli, Federico Davini, Pier Luigi Filosso, Franca Melfi
{"title":"Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Related to Lymphadenectomy in Clinical Stage I NSCLC: A Multicenter Retrospective Experience.","authors":"Beatrice Manfredini, Carmelina Cristina Zirafa, Alessandro Stefani, Gaetano Romano, Greta Alì, Riccardo Morganti, Ilaria Ceccarelli, Federico Davini, Pier Luigi Filosso, Franca Melfi","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32010031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lymphadenectomy is considered a key part of the radical treatment of resectable lung cancer, although its appropriate extension in early stages is a debated topic due to the great heterogeneity of studies in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the impact of lymphadenectomy extent on survival and recurrence in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy and lymph node dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from clinical stage I NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy and hilar-mediastinal lymphadenectomy at two thoracic surgery centers from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Information regarding perioperative outcomes and lymphadenectomy details was collected and analyzed, and their impact on OS, CSS, and DFS was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the period under review, 323 patients with stage cI lung cancer underwent lobectomy with lymphadenectomy. Statistical analysis showed that the evaluated lymph nodal factors (mean number of lymph nodes removed and number and type of lymph node station explored) did not statistically significantly impact OS, CSS, and DFS at a median follow-up of 59 months (IQR 45-71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that a less invasive procedure than systematic lymphadenectomy could be performed in early-stage cases with adequate preoperative staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32010031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lymphadenectomy is considered a key part of the radical treatment of resectable lung cancer, although its appropriate extension in early stages is a debated topic due to the great heterogeneity of studies in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the impact of lymphadenectomy extent on survival and recurrence in the treatment of early-stage NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy and lymph node dissection.

Methods: Data from clinical stage I NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy and hilar-mediastinal lymphadenectomy at two thoracic surgery centers from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Information regarding perioperative outcomes and lymphadenectomy details was collected and analyzed, and their impact on OS, CSS, and DFS was assessed.

Results: During the period under review, 323 patients with stage cI lung cancer underwent lobectomy with lymphadenectomy. Statistical analysis showed that the evaluated lymph nodal factors (mean number of lymph nodes removed and number and type of lymph node station explored) did not statistically significantly impact OS, CSS, and DFS at a median follow-up of 59 months (IQR 45-71).

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that a less invasive procedure than systematic lymphadenectomy could be performed in early-stage cases with adequate preoperative staging.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床I期非小细胞肺癌淋巴结切除术相关的长期肿瘤预后:一项多中心回顾性研究
背景:淋巴结切除术被认为是可切除肺癌根治性治疗的关键部分,尽管由于文献研究的巨大异质性,其在早期阶段的适当扩展是一个有争议的话题。本研究旨在评估淋巴结切除程度对早期NSCLC患者行肺叶切除及淋巴结清扫治疗的生存及复发的影响。方法:回顾性分析2016 - 2019年在两家胸外科中心行肺叶切除术和肺门纵隔淋巴结切除术的临床I期非小细胞肺癌患者的资料。收集和分析围手术期结局和淋巴结切除术细节的信息,并评估其对OS、CSS和DFS的影响。结果:在本研究期间,323例cI期肺癌患者接受了肺叶切除术和淋巴结切除术。统计分析显示,在中位随访59个月(IQR 45-71)时,评估的淋巴结因素(平均淋巴结切除数、淋巴结探查站数和类型)对OS、CSS和DFS无统计学意义。结论:本研究的结果表明,在术前分期适当的早期病例中,可以采用比系统性淋巴结切除术侵入性更小的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
Interplay Between p53 and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: Associations with Mismatch Repair Status, Tumor Microenvironment, and Clinicopathological Outcomes. Hepatitis B Virus Infection Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Liver Metastasis in Gastric Cancer. Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review. Dermatomyositis as a Paraneoplastic Syndrome of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Bridging Perspectives: How Canadian Patients and Caregivers View Quality of Life in Multiple Myeloma Compared to Validated Instruments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1