Adjuvant Treatment with Empagliflozin or Semaglutide Increases Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Subjects with Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Current Issues in Molecular Biology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.3390/cimb47010054
Maja Preložnik Navodnik, Katarina Reberšek, Katarina Klinar, Andrej Janež, Helena Podgornik
{"title":"Adjuvant Treatment with Empagliflozin or Semaglutide Increases Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Subjects with Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Maja Preložnik Navodnik, Katarina Reberšek, Katarina Klinar, Andrej Janež, Helena Podgornik","doi":"10.3390/cimb47010054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are promising markers of vascular damage and endothelial regeneration potential. We focused on the detection of CECs and EPCs using flow cytometry with regard to analytical challenges and its suitability for routine testing. As part of a clinical validation, CECs and EPCs were measured in blood samples from 83 subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), evaluating an adjuvant intervention with two different antidiabetic drugs, empagliflozin (N = 28) and semaglutide (N = 29). Both groups receiving adjuvant therapy were compared with the insulin-only group (N = 26) at two time points: before the start of therapy and after 12 weeks of adjuvant therapy. All three groups were comparable regarding demographic characteristics and concomitant risk factors. Absolute and relative endothelial cell count at baseline were low and comparable to those of healthy individuals. In the group receiving empagliflozin or semaglutide, a significant increase in EPC was observed after 12 weeks of treatment. We demonstrated that EPCs have the potential to serve as markers for monitoring the efficacy of adjuvant therapy in T1DM patients. However, before their implementation in clinical practice, the flow cytometry protocol for CEC and EPC identification and quantification must be standardized.</p>","PeriodicalId":10839,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Molecular Biology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47010054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are promising markers of vascular damage and endothelial regeneration potential. We focused on the detection of CECs and EPCs using flow cytometry with regard to analytical challenges and its suitability for routine testing. As part of a clinical validation, CECs and EPCs were measured in blood samples from 83 subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), evaluating an adjuvant intervention with two different antidiabetic drugs, empagliflozin (N = 28) and semaglutide (N = 29). Both groups receiving adjuvant therapy were compared with the insulin-only group (N = 26) at two time points: before the start of therapy and after 12 weeks of adjuvant therapy. All three groups were comparable regarding demographic characteristics and concomitant risk factors. Absolute and relative endothelial cell count at baseline were low and comparable to those of healthy individuals. In the group receiving empagliflozin or semaglutide, a significant increase in EPC was observed after 12 weeks of treatment. We demonstrated that EPCs have the potential to serve as markers for monitoring the efficacy of adjuvant therapy in T1DM patients. However, before their implementation in clinical practice, the flow cytometry protocol for CEC and EPC identification and quantification must be standardized.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恩格列净或塞马鲁肽辅助治疗可增加控制良好的1型糖尿病患者的内皮祖细胞。
循环内皮细胞(CECs)和内皮祖细胞(EPCs)是血管损伤和内皮再生潜力的有前途的标志物。我们重点研究了流式细胞术检测CECs和EPCs的分析挑战及其在常规检测中的适用性。作为临床验证的一部分,研究人员在83名1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者的血液样本中测量了CECs和EPCs,评估了两种不同的降糖药——恩格列清(N = 28)和西马鲁肽(N = 29)的辅助干预。两组接受辅助治疗的患者在治疗开始前和辅助治疗12周后两个时间点与仅胰岛素组(N = 26)进行比较。所有三组在人口统计学特征和伴随的危险因素方面具有可比性。基线时内皮细胞的绝对和相对计数较低,与健康人相当。在接受恩格列净或西马鲁肽治疗的组中,治疗12周后观察到EPC显著增加。我们证明EPCs有潜力作为监测T1DM患者辅助治疗疗效的标记物。然而,在应用于临床实践之前,流式细胞术对CEC和EPC的鉴定和定量必须标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
Current Issues in Molecular Biology 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
380
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Issues in Molecular Biology (CIMB) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing review articles and minireviews in all areas of molecular biology and microbiology. Submitted articles are subject to an Article Processing Charge (APC) and are open access immediately upon publication. All manuscripts undergo a peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Biotransformation of Maclekarpine E in Rats: CYP2C19-Mediated Metabolism, Fecal Enrichment, and Network Pharmacology-Based Anti-Ulcerative Colitis Prediction. Tea Polysaccharides Ameliorates Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Mice via Regulating Macrophages Polarization by Gut Microbial Metabolites. The Mechanism of Action of Stigmasterol in Bone Formation in Osteoporosis. Anti-Biofilm Activity of Combinations of Cinnamic Acid and Its Derivatives with Cloxacillin Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Neurotransmitter Systems in Alzheimer's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1