Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Increased Usage and Improvements in Clinical Outcomes in Canada.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.3390/curroncol32010010
Matthew D Seftel, Grace Musto, David Allan, Oliver Bucher, Kevin Hay, Ivan Pasic, Tony Truong, Kristjan Paulson
{"title":"Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Increased Usage and Improvements in Clinical Outcomes in Canada.","authors":"Matthew D Seftel, Grace Musto, David Allan, Oliver Bucher, Kevin Hay, Ivan Pasic, Tony Truong, Kristjan Paulson","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), a minority of patients have access to a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor (MRD). To fill this gap, matched unrelated donors (MUDs) are an increasingly selected donor source. Usage and outcomes after MUD HCT for Canada are not described. We investigated temporal trends in MUD compared to MRD HCT from 2000 to 2019 using data reported to the Cell Therapy and Transplant Canada (CTTC) Registry. Of 7571 first allogeneic HCTs between 2000 and 2019, the proportion of MUD HCTs rose from 35.1% to 56.3% in the early (2000-2009) and later (2010-2019) eras, respectively. Comparing the two donor sources, the 5-year overall survival (OS) after MUD HCT for patients with malignant diseases was inferior to MRD HCT in the early era (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, in the later era, OS was comparable for the two donor sources (<i>p</i> = 0.969). For patients with non-malignant diseases, the 5-year OS after MUD HCT was inferior to MRD in the early era (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but in the later era, the 5-year OS was similar between the two donor sources (<i>p</i> = 0.209). Improvements in OS after MUD HCT were accompanied by corresponding reductions in the 2-year non-relapse mortality after MUD HCT. We conclude that MUDs are the most common donor source in Canada, and key clinical outcomes after MUD have improved over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32010010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), a minority of patients have access to a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor (MRD). To fill this gap, matched unrelated donors (MUDs) are an increasingly selected donor source. Usage and outcomes after MUD HCT for Canada are not described. We investigated temporal trends in MUD compared to MRD HCT from 2000 to 2019 using data reported to the Cell Therapy and Transplant Canada (CTTC) Registry. Of 7571 first allogeneic HCTs between 2000 and 2019, the proportion of MUD HCTs rose from 35.1% to 56.3% in the early (2000-2009) and later (2010-2019) eras, respectively. Comparing the two donor sources, the 5-year overall survival (OS) after MUD HCT for patients with malignant diseases was inferior to MRD HCT in the early era (p < 0.001). However, in the later era, OS was comparable for the two donor sources (p = 0.969). For patients with non-malignant diseases, the 5-year OS after MUD HCT was inferior to MRD in the early era (p < 0.001), but in the later era, the 5-year OS was similar between the two donor sources (p = 0.209). Improvements in OS after MUD HCT were accompanied by corresponding reductions in the 2-year non-relapse mortality after MUD HCT. We conclude that MUDs are the most common donor source in Canada, and key clinical outcomes after MUD have improved over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匹配非亲属供体造血细胞移植:在加拿大增加使用和改善临床结果。
在同种异体造血细胞移植(HCT)中,少数患者可以获得合适的人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配相关供体(MRD)。为了填补这一空白,匹配的非亲属捐赠者(mud)成为越来越多选择的捐赠者来源。在加拿大,没有描述MUD HCT的使用情况和结果。我们使用报告给加拿大细胞治疗和移植登记处(CTTC)的数据,研究了2000年至2019年MUD与MRD HCT的时间趋势。在2000年至2019年期间的7571例首次异基因hct中,MUD hct的比例分别在早期(2000-2009年)和后期(2010-2019年)从35.1%上升到56.3%。对比两种供体来源,恶性疾病患者早期MUD HCT后的5年总生存率(OS)低于MRD HCT (p < 0.001)。然而,在后期,两种供体来源的OS具有可比性(p = 0.969)。对于非恶性疾病患者,早期MUD HCT后的5年OS低于MRD (p < 0.001),但后期两种供体来源的5年OS相似(p = 0.209)。MUD HCT后OS的改善伴随着MUD HCT后2年非复发死亡率的相应降低。我们得出结论,MUD是加拿大最常见的供体来源,MUD后的主要临床结果随着时间的推移而改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
Interplay Between p53 and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: Associations with Mismatch Repair Status, Tumor Microenvironment, and Clinicopathological Outcomes. Hepatitis B Virus Infection Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Liver Metastasis in Gastric Cancer. Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review. Dermatomyositis as a Paraneoplastic Syndrome of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Bridging Perspectives: How Canadian Patients and Caregivers View Quality of Life in Multiple Myeloma Compared to Validated Instruments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1