Strategies for Mitigating Cancer-Related Financial Toxicity in China: A Multiperspective Qualitative Study Based on the Socioecological Framework.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1200/OP.24.00399
Xiaoyi Yuan, Yanling Sun, Yi Kuang, Jiajia Qiu, Jing Zhu, Haiyan Gu, Weijie Xing
{"title":"Strategies for Mitigating Cancer-Related Financial Toxicity in China: A Multiperspective Qualitative Study Based on the Socioecological Framework.","authors":"Xiaoyi Yuan, Yanling Sun, Yi Kuang, Jiajia Qiu, Jing Zhu, Haiyan Gu, Weijie Xing","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore strategies related to cancer-related financial toxicity (FT) from the perspectives of cancer survivors and stakeholders in China and to evaluate their views within the context of the social ecological model (SEM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March and July 2022, we conducted a descriptive qualitative study with semistructured interviews of 23 cancer survivors and 14 stakeholders. Qualitative content analysis on the basis of the SEM was used to analyze the data with NVivo 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Guided by the SEM, we identified 12 subthemes that described how to mitigate FT. Individual-level strategies included increasing cost-related health literacy, strengthening adherence to standardized treatments, and improving resilience to cancer and financial changes. Interpersonal-level strategies included strengthening family support and social networks. Organizational-level strategies included using evidence-based treatments, effective communication of costs, and providing financial information support. Community-level strategies included improving symptom management throughout survivorship and providing psychosocial support. Policy-level strategies included optimizing health insurance policies and promoting collaboration among medical institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide a comprehensive understanding of strategies pertaining to FT, offering insights that could support the development of future interventions. This research suggests that interventions that encompass multiple levels-individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy-rather than focusing on only one level might be the most beneficial for managing FT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"970-978"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore strategies related to cancer-related financial toxicity (FT) from the perspectives of cancer survivors and stakeholders in China and to evaluate their views within the context of the social ecological model (SEM).

Methods: Between March and July 2022, we conducted a descriptive qualitative study with semistructured interviews of 23 cancer survivors and 14 stakeholders. Qualitative content analysis on the basis of the SEM was used to analyze the data with NVivo 12.

Results: Guided by the SEM, we identified 12 subthemes that described how to mitigate FT. Individual-level strategies included increasing cost-related health literacy, strengthening adherence to standardized treatments, and improving resilience to cancer and financial changes. Interpersonal-level strategies included strengthening family support and social networks. Organizational-level strategies included using evidence-based treatments, effective communication of costs, and providing financial information support. Community-level strategies included improving symptom management throughout survivorship and providing psychosocial support. Policy-level strategies included optimizing health insurance policies and promoting collaboration among medical institutions.

Conclusion: Our findings provide a comprehensive understanding of strategies pertaining to FT, offering insights that could support the development of future interventions. This research suggests that interventions that encompass multiple levels-individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy-rather than focusing on only one level might be the most beneficial for managing FT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缓解中国癌症相关金融毒性的策略:基于社会生态学框架的多视角定性研究
目的:从中国癌症幸存者和利益相关者的角度探讨与癌症相关的金融毒性(FT)相关的策略,并在社会生态模型(SEM)的背景下评估他们的观点。方法:在2022年3月至7月期间,我们对23名癌症幸存者和14名利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,进行了描述性定性研究。采用NVivo 12软件对数据进行定性含量分析。结果:在扫描电镜的指导下,我们确定了12个描述如何减轻FT的子主题。个人层面的策略包括提高与成本相关的健康素养,加强对标准化治疗的依从性,以及提高对癌症和金融变化的适应能力。人际层面的策略包括加强家庭支持和社会网络。组织层面的策略包括使用循证治疗、有效的成本沟通和提供财务信息支持。社区层面的策略包括改善生存期间的症状管理和提供社会心理支持。政策层面的战略包括优化医疗保险政策和促进医疗机构之间的合作。结论:我们的研究结果提供了对FT相关策略的全面理解,提供了可以支持未来干预措施发展的见解。这项研究表明,包括个人、人际、组织、社区和政策等多个层面的干预,而不是只关注一个层面,可能对管理金融危机最有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Implementing a System-Wide Comprehensive Cancer Navigation Program in a Rapidly Expanding Health System. Composition of Health Care Contact Days and Mortality Prediction Among Older Adult Clinical Trial Participants. Review Duration and Therapeutic Value of Cancer Drugs Granted Priority Versus Nonpriority Review in the United States, European Union, and Switzerland (2010-2024). When Priority Review No Longer Prioritizes. Never Stop the Pressure: Maintaining Angiogenesis Inhibition Beyond Progression in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1