Rapid Improvement in Cardiac Damage Predicts Better Prognosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.3390/jcdd12010029
Hao-Wei Lee, Chih-Hui Chin, Po-Chin Chou, Chia-Hsiu Chang, Chiu-Ling Tsai, Chi-Hung Huang
{"title":"Rapid Improvement in Cardiac Damage Predicts Better Prognosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.","authors":"Hao-Wei Lee, Chih-Hui Chin, Po-Chin Chou, Chia-Hsiu Chang, Chiu-Ling Tsai, Chi-Hung Huang","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12010029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A staging system based on cardiac damage for severe aortic stenosis (AS) has been validated for prognosis prediction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our study aims to investigate whether TAVR can lead to changes in cardiac damage shortly after the procedure and how these changes impact prognosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients in this retrospective cohort study were classified into five stages (0-4) before TAVR based on the echocardiographic findings of cardiac damage. The closest echocardiogram after TAVR was used for restaging cardiac damage. The primary composite outcome was all-cause mortality or hospitalization due to heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 patients were enrolled (53.1% male, mean age 81.7 ± 7.7 years). Within a mean interval of 4 days (interquartile range = 3 to 7 days) after TAVR, cardiac damage improved in 25.0% of patients, while it worsened in 20.3%. During a median follow-up of 2.5 ± 1.9 years, 34.4% of patients met the primary endpoint, which included 16 deaths and 6 HF hospitalizations. Cox regression analysis revealed that improvement in cardiac damage correlated with a lower risk of composite death or HF hospitalization (HR: 0.095; 95% CI: 0.014-0.627; <i>p</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVR can lead to changes in cardiac damage over a short period in patients with severe AS, and rapid improvement in cardiac damage after TAVR is associated with a better prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11765824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12010029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A staging system based on cardiac damage for severe aortic stenosis (AS) has been validated for prognosis prediction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our study aims to investigate whether TAVR can lead to changes in cardiac damage shortly after the procedure and how these changes impact prognosis.

Method: Patients in this retrospective cohort study were classified into five stages (0-4) before TAVR based on the echocardiographic findings of cardiac damage. The closest echocardiogram after TAVR was used for restaging cardiac damage. The primary composite outcome was all-cause mortality or hospitalization due to heart failure (HF).

Results: A total of 64 patients were enrolled (53.1% male, mean age 81.7 ± 7.7 years). Within a mean interval of 4 days (interquartile range = 3 to 7 days) after TAVR, cardiac damage improved in 25.0% of patients, while it worsened in 20.3%. During a median follow-up of 2.5 ± 1.9 years, 34.4% of patients met the primary endpoint, which included 16 deaths and 6 HF hospitalizations. Cox regression analysis revealed that improvement in cardiac damage correlated with a lower risk of composite death or HF hospitalization (HR: 0.095; 95% CI: 0.014-0.627; p = 0.015).

Conclusions: TAVR can lead to changes in cardiac damage over a short period in patients with severe AS, and rapid improvement in cardiac damage after TAVR is associated with a better prognosis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心脏损伤的快速改善预示着更好的预后。
背景:基于严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)心脏损伤的分期系统已被证实可用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的预后预测。我们的研究旨在探讨TAVR是否会导致手术后不久心脏损伤的变化以及这些变化如何影响预后。方法:本回顾性队列研究将TAVR患者根据心脏超声检查结果分为5期(0 ~ 4期)。TAVR术后最接近超声心动图用于心脏损伤的再诊断。主要综合结局为全因死亡率或心力衰竭住院。结果:共入组64例患者,其中男性53.1%,平均年龄81.7±7.7岁。TAVR术后平均4天(四分位数间距= 3 - 7天)内,25.0%的患者心脏损伤改善,20.3%的患者心脏损伤恶化。在中位随访2.5±1.9年期间,34.4%的患者达到了主要终点,其中包括16例死亡和6例心衰住院。Cox回归分析显示,心脏损伤的改善与较低的复合死亡或HF住院风险相关(HR: 0.095;95% ci: 0.014-0.627;P = 0.015)。结论:重度AS患者TAVR可在短时间内引起心脏损伤的改变,TAVR后心脏损伤的快速改善与较好的预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
期刊最新文献
Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nurse-Led Secondary Prevention After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Bridging the Gender Gap in Cardiovascular Outcomes-A Sub-Analysis of the BEAT-HF Study. The Left Axillary Artery as an Alternative Inflow Source in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Safety, Feasibility, and Mid-Term Outcomes. Saudi Secondary Prevention Survey Study in Patients with Prior Acute Myocardial Infarction (4S Registry): Study Design and Pilot Phase Results. Short-Term Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Coronary Syndrome with Cardiogenic Shock: Which Device to Choose?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1