Classification and treatment approach of chemical burn associated Limbal stem cell deficiency: based on novel global consensus.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY International Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s10792-024-03389-y
Ilayda Korkmaz, Ozer Sakin, Melis Palamar, Sait Egrilmez, Ayse Yagci, Ozlem Barut Selver
{"title":"Classification and treatment approach of chemical burn associated Limbal stem cell deficiency: based on novel global consensus.","authors":"Ilayda Korkmaz, Ozer Sakin, Melis Palamar, Sait Egrilmez, Ayse Yagci, Ozlem Barut Selver","doi":"10.1007/s10792-024-03389-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the severity distribution of chemical burn-induced Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) according to the novel global consensus classification and to compare the treatment approach, before and after the global consensus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 127 eyes of 109 patients with LSCD were included. LSCD stages were categorized according to the global consensus classification published by \"International LSCD Working Group\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 37.5 ± 16.5(6-75). The distribution of LSCD stage according to the global consensus scale was as follows: Stage 1A in 5 eyes(3.9%);Stage 1B in 16 eyes(12.6%);Stage 1C in 4 eyes(3.2%);Stage 2A in 15 eyes(11.8%);Stage 2B in 36 eyes(28.3%);Stage 3 in 51 eyes(40.2%). A total of 88(69.3%) eyes underwent surgery for LSCD. Of these, 80 had surgery prior to the publication of the global consensus (before October 2020), 58(72.5%) had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD and 22(27.5%) had preoperative early stage (≤ Stage 2A) LSCD. As of October 2020, all 8 eyes that underwent surgery had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD, as recommended by global consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recently, a global consensus has been established on both the classification and the management of LSCD. This study is one of the first to present small-scale epidemiological data on the severity distribution of LSCD in the light of the global consensus. It was observed that surgery was performed on 27.5% of the eyes that were not recommended for surgery according to this new consensus. With the increasing awareness of this consensus, it might be possible to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03389-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the severity distribution of chemical burn-induced Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) according to the novel global consensus classification and to compare the treatment approach, before and after the global consensus.

Methods: Medical records of 127 eyes of 109 patients with LSCD were included. LSCD stages were categorized according to the global consensus classification published by "International LSCD Working Group".

Results: The mean age was 37.5 ± 16.5(6-75). The distribution of LSCD stage according to the global consensus scale was as follows: Stage 1A in 5 eyes(3.9%);Stage 1B in 16 eyes(12.6%);Stage 1C in 4 eyes(3.2%);Stage 2A in 15 eyes(11.8%);Stage 2B in 36 eyes(28.3%);Stage 3 in 51 eyes(40.2%). A total of 88(69.3%) eyes underwent surgery for LSCD. Of these, 80 had surgery prior to the publication of the global consensus (before October 2020), 58(72.5%) had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD and 22(27.5%) had preoperative early stage (≤ Stage 2A) LSCD. As of October 2020, all 8 eyes that underwent surgery had preoperative severe (≥ Stage 2B) LSCD, as recommended by global consensus.

Conclusion: Recently, a global consensus has been established on both the classification and the management of LSCD. This study is one of the first to present small-scale epidemiological data on the severity distribution of LSCD in the light of the global consensus. It was observed that surgery was performed on 27.5% of the eyes that were not recommended for surgery according to this new consensus. With the increasing awareness of this consensus, it might be possible to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
期刊最新文献
The role of triglyceride-glucose index in central retinal artery occlusion. Clinico-tomographic-pathological correlation in nodulo-ulcerative ocular surface squamous neoplasia: a study of 16 cases. Exploring the efficacy and safety of neuroprotective agents in optic neuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Agreement between Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius®) and anterior-segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (ANTERİON®) devices for corneal high order aberrations in keratoconic and healthy eyes. Exploring the immunological underpinnings of allergic conjunctivitis: the role of CD4 + T Cells and SLAM expression in ocular surface disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1