Current Trends and Perspectives of Pressure Wire-Based Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.3390/jcdd12010016
Yoshiyuki Takami, Atsuo Maekawa, Koji Yamana, Kiyotoshi Akita, Kentaro Amano, Wakana Niwa, Kazuki Matsuhashi, Yasushi Takagi
{"title":"Current Trends and Perspectives of Pressure Wire-Based Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.","authors":"Yoshiyuki Takami, Atsuo Maekawa, Koji Yamana, Kiyotoshi Akita, Kentaro Amano, Wakana Niwa, Kazuki Matsuhashi, Yasushi Takagi","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12010016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been well validated as a modality for evaluating myocardial ischemia, demonstrating the superiority of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over conventional angiography-guided PCI. As a result, the strategy for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is shifting toward FFR guidance. However, the advantage of FFR-guided CABG over angiography-guided CABG remains unclear. While FFR-guided CABG can help avoid unnecessary grafting in cases of moderate stenosis, it may also carry the risk of incomplete revascularization. The limited use of FFR due to the need for hyperemia has led to the development of non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs). NHPR pullback provides trans-stenotic pressure gradients, which may offer valuable insights for CABG strategies. Recently, computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) has emerged as a non-invasive modality that provides accurate data on lesion length, diameter, minimum lumen area, percentage stenosis, and the volume and distribution of high-risk plaques. With the introduction of FFR-CT, CTCA is now highly anticipated to provide both functional evaluation (of myocardial ischemia) via FFR-CT and anatomical information through serial quantitative assessment. Beyond the diagnostic phase, CTCA, augmented by automatic artificial intelligence, holds great potential for guiding therapeutic interventions in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11766423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12010016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been well validated as a modality for evaluating myocardial ischemia, demonstrating the superiority of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over conventional angiography-guided PCI. As a result, the strategy for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is shifting toward FFR guidance. However, the advantage of FFR-guided CABG over angiography-guided CABG remains unclear. While FFR-guided CABG can help avoid unnecessary grafting in cases of moderate stenosis, it may also carry the risk of incomplete revascularization. The limited use of FFR due to the need for hyperemia has led to the development of non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs). NHPR pullback provides trans-stenotic pressure gradients, which may offer valuable insights for CABG strategies. Recently, computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) has emerged as a non-invasive modality that provides accurate data on lesion length, diameter, minimum lumen area, percentage stenosis, and the volume and distribution of high-risk plaques. With the introduction of FFR-CT, CTCA is now highly anticipated to provide both functional evaluation (of myocardial ischemia) via FFR-CT and anatomical information through serial quantitative assessment. Beyond the diagnostic phase, CTCA, augmented by automatic artificial intelligence, holds great potential for guiding therapeutic interventions in the future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加压钢丝冠状动脉旁路移植术的发展趋势与展望。
分数血流储备(FFR)作为评估心肌缺血的一种方式已经得到了很好的验证,这表明FFR引导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)优于传统的血管造影引导下的PCI。因此,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的策略正在转向FFR指导。然而,ffr引导的冠状动脉搭桥相对于血管造影引导的冠状动脉搭桥的优势尚不清楚。虽然ffr引导下的冠状动脉搭桥可以帮助避免中度狭窄病例不必要的移植,但它也可能带来不完全血运重建的风险。由于充血的需要,FFR的有限使用导致了非充血压力比(nhpr)的发展。NHPR回拉提供了跨狭窄的压力梯度,可能为CABG策略提供有价值的见解。最近,计算机断层冠状动脉造影(CTCA)作为一种非侵入性方式出现,可提供病变长度、直径、最小管腔面积、狭窄百分比以及高危斑块的体积和分布的准确数据。随着FFR-CT的引入,CTCA现在被高度期待通过FFR-CT提供功能评估(心肌缺血)和通过一系列定量评估的解剖信息。在诊断阶段之外,CTCA在自动人工智能的增强下,在未来指导治疗干预方面具有巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
期刊最新文献
Vertical Right Axillary Thoracotomy for Repair of Ventricular Septal Defects in Infants and Children: Experience with 50 Consecutive Cases. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Balancing Embolic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage Risk in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Southern Italy: A Retrospective Analysis of 11,653 Cases. Single-Site Experience in the ONSET-OFFSET Study Demonstrates Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Advantages of Ticagrelor over Clopidogrel in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes. Mechanical Circulatory Support in the Very Elderly Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures: A Case Report and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1