Development and validation of a radiomics-visual evoked potential nomogram for preoperative prediction of visual outcome after endoscopic craniopharyngioma resection.
{"title":"Development and validation of a radiomics-visual evoked potential nomogram for preoperative prediction of visual outcome after endoscopic craniopharyngioma resection.","authors":"Ning Qiao, Chuzhong Li, Fei Zheng, Lingling Zhang, Xiaocui Yang, Jing Xu, Xuzhu Chen, Hui Qiao, Yazhuo Zhang, Songbai Gui","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.JNS241482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Craniopharyngiomas are rare, benign brain tumors that are primarily treated with surgery. Although the extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEEA) has evolved as a more reliable surgical alternative and yields better visual outcomes than traditional craniotomy, postoperative visual deterioration remains one of the most common complications, and relevant risk factors are still poorly defined. Hence, identifying risk factors and developing a predictive model for postoperative visual deterioration is indeed necessary. However, there is still a lack of research on these topics. Therefore, the authors used the largest known case series of EEEA for craniopharyngioma to determine pertinent risk factors and develop a nomogram for the noninvasive preoperative prediction of visual outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 483 cases of craniopharyngioma (338 in the training cohort, 145 in the validation cohort) between January 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed, and related risk factors were identified. In total, 851 radiomic features from the MR images of each case were extracted. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was used to select features and construct the radiomic score (Rad-score). A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was adopted to construct a radiomic model. Moreover, a clinical-radiomic nomogram was built by multivariable logistic regression. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence of postoperative visual deterioration was 9.1%. A lack of intraoperative visual evoked potential (VEP) monitoring (OR 0.221, p = 0.001), larger maximum tumor diameter (OR 1.052, p = 0.014), and tight adherence (OR 2.963, p = 0.044) were demonstrated as independent risk factors for postoperative visual deterioration. The radiomic model using the SVM based on 8 selected features exhibited good discrimination in predicting adhesion strength in the training and validation cohorts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.85 vs 0.80). Moreover, the nomogram incorporating the Rad-score and clinical factors showed AUCs of 0.827 and 0.808 in the training and validation sets, respectively, fitting well in calibration curves. Decision curve analysis further confirmed the clinical usefulness of the nomogram.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative VEP monitoring was proven to help reduce postoperative visual deterioration, while tight adherence and larger maximum tumor diameter were confirmed as independent risk factors. The radiomic model allowed a noninvasive prediction of the adherence strength between the optic nerves and craniopharyngioma. The nomogram showed a promising performance for noninvasively predicting postoperative visual deterioration and may serve as a useful tool for clinical decision-making and patient counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1663-1673"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.JNS241482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Craniopharyngiomas are rare, benign brain tumors that are primarily treated with surgery. Although the extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEEA) has evolved as a more reliable surgical alternative and yields better visual outcomes than traditional craniotomy, postoperative visual deterioration remains one of the most common complications, and relevant risk factors are still poorly defined. Hence, identifying risk factors and developing a predictive model for postoperative visual deterioration is indeed necessary. However, there is still a lack of research on these topics. Therefore, the authors used the largest known case series of EEEA for craniopharyngioma to determine pertinent risk factors and develop a nomogram for the noninvasive preoperative prediction of visual outcome.
Methods: A total of 483 cases of craniopharyngioma (338 in the training cohort, 145 in the validation cohort) between January 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed, and related risk factors were identified. In total, 851 radiomic features from the MR images of each case were extracted. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was used to select features and construct the radiomic score (Rad-score). A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was adopted to construct a radiomic model. Moreover, a clinical-radiomic nomogram was built by multivariable logistic regression. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.
Results: The overall incidence of postoperative visual deterioration was 9.1%. A lack of intraoperative visual evoked potential (VEP) monitoring (OR 0.221, p = 0.001), larger maximum tumor diameter (OR 1.052, p = 0.014), and tight adherence (OR 2.963, p = 0.044) were demonstrated as independent risk factors for postoperative visual deterioration. The radiomic model using the SVM based on 8 selected features exhibited good discrimination in predicting adhesion strength in the training and validation cohorts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.85 vs 0.80). Moreover, the nomogram incorporating the Rad-score and clinical factors showed AUCs of 0.827 and 0.808 in the training and validation sets, respectively, fitting well in calibration curves. Decision curve analysis further confirmed the clinical usefulness of the nomogram.
Conclusions: Intraoperative VEP monitoring was proven to help reduce postoperative visual deterioration, while tight adherence and larger maximum tumor diameter were confirmed as independent risk factors. The radiomic model allowed a noninvasive prediction of the adherence strength between the optic nerves and craniopharyngioma. The nomogram showed a promising performance for noninvasively predicting postoperative visual deterioration and may serve as a useful tool for clinical decision-making and patient counseling.
目的:颅咽管瘤是一种罕见的良性脑肿瘤,主要以手术治疗。尽管扩展内镜鼻内入路(EEEA)已经发展成为一种更可靠的手术选择,并且比传统开颅术的视力效果更好,但术后视力恶化仍然是最常见的并发症之一,相关的危险因素仍然不明确。因此,确定术后视力恶化的危险因素并建立预测模型确实是必要的。然而,关于这些主题的研究仍然缺乏。因此,作者使用了已知最大的颅咽管瘤EEEA病例序列来确定相关的危险因素,并开发了一种无创术前视力预后预测图。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2023年3月期间共483例颅咽管瘤患者(培训组338例,验证组145例),并确定相关危险因素。从每个病例的MR图像中共提取了851个放射学特征。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子算法选择特征并构建放射学评分(Rad-score)。采用支持向量机(SVM)分类器构建放射学模型。此外,通过多变量logistic回归建立了临床-放射学关系图。通过其鉴别、校准和临床应用来评估nomogram的性能。结果:术后整体视力下降发生率为9.1%。术中缺乏视觉诱发电位(VEP)监测(OR 0.221, p = 0.001)、最大肿瘤直径较大(OR 1.052, p = 0.014)和严格依从性(OR 2.963, p = 0.044)被证明是术后视力恶化的独立危险因素。使用基于8个选定特征的支持向量机的放射学模型在预测训练和验证队列的粘附强度方面表现出良好的辨别能力(接受者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC] 0.85 vs 0.80)。纳入rad评分和临床因素的nomogram在训练集和验证集的auc分别为0.827和0.808,与校准曲线拟合良好。决策曲线分析进一步证实了nomogram的临床应用价值。结论:术中VEP监测有助于减轻术后视力恶化,而依从性较严和最大肿瘤直径较大是独立的危险因素。放射组学模型可以无创地预测视神经和颅咽管瘤之间的粘附强度。在无创预测术后视力恶化方面,nomogram显示了良好的表现,并可作为临床决策和患者咨询的有用工具。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.