Cannabis poisonings in Australia following the legalisation of medicinal cannabis, 2014–24: analysis of NSW Poisons Information Centre data

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.5694/mja2.52586
Rose Cairns, Sara Allaf, Nicholas A Buckley
{"title":"Cannabis poisonings in Australia following the legalisation of medicinal cannabis, 2014–24: analysis of NSW Poisons Information Centre data","authors":"Rose Cairns,&nbsp;Sara Allaf,&nbsp;Nicholas A Buckley","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several countries have legalised medicinal cannabis during the past two decades; more recently, some jurisdictions, including parts of the United States, Canada, and Uruguay, have legalised recreational cannabis.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Legislative models differ between countries, particularly with regard to access to medicinal cannabis, commercialisation, the availability of cannabis dispensaries, and cannabis-containing confectionery (“edibles”).<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>One potential harm of increased access to cannabis is poisoning. It is widely believed that cannabis is safe in overdose,<span><sup>3</sup></span> but it can cause central nervous system (CNS) excitation, CNS depression, hallucinations, psychosis, and cardiac dysrhythmias.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The risk of severe toxicity is greater for children, in whom it can lead to apnoea and coma; in one United States study, 32 of 60 children (0–10 years) hospitalised with cannabis intoxication required intensive care.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Several studies have reported increases in the number of poisonings following medicinal and recreational cannabis legalisation, particularly in children.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Edibles are particularly high risk products because of their palatability and the possibility of large ingestions.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Most reports on this problem are from North America.<span><sup>6</sup></span></p><p>In Australia, the medicinal use of cannabidiol (CBD) was legalised in June 2015, and that of cannabis and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in November 2016.<span><sup>7</sup></span> We therefore evaluated recent cannabis poisoning exposures in Australia, stratified by ingestion intent, age group, and product type. We analysed data from the New South Wales Poisons Information Centre (NSWPIC), which receives about 50% of all calls to Australian poisons information centres; 65% of calls are from within NSW, 35% from other states.<span><sup>8</sup></span> We extracted data on demographic and exposure characteristics, patient disposition, and cannabinoid product types for calls during 1 July 2014 – 30 June 2024. We calculated crude and age-adjusted population exposure call rates (Supporting Information, supplementary methods), and used Joinpoint regression (version 4.9.0.1) to estimate annual percentage changes (APCs) in age-adjusted rates and to detect trend change points. The study was approved by the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/ETH00165).</p><p>There were 3796 calls about cannabis poisoning exposures (2039 regarding exposures of boys or men, 54%) during 2014–24. The exposed person exhibited symptoms of poisoning at the time of the call in 3184 cases (84% of calls); 2783 people (74%) were in hospital at the time of the call or were referred to hospital (Supporting Information, table 1). The number of calls increased during 2014–24 by 12.8% per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3–15.4% per year), and no trend change points were detected (Box 1). Intentional cannabis exposures were reported by 2981 calls (79% of calls), and the number increased by 9.2% (95% CI, 6.3–12.2%) per year. Unintentional cannabis exposures were reported by 815 calls (21%), and the number increased by 30.0% (95% CI, 23.5–36.8%) per year (Box 1, Box 2).</p><p>The age-adjusted cannabis poisoning exposure rate was highest for adolescents (15–19 years; 11.4 calls per 100 000 population per year); the age-adjusted rate for unintentional exposures was highest for toddlers (1–4 years; 1.9 calls per 100 000 population per year) (Supporting Information, table 2).</p><p>Plant-based cannabis (ie, flower or leaf) was the reported exposure form in 2663 cases (70% of all cases) (Supporting Information, table 1); the proportion declined from 72% in 2014–15 to 61% in 2023–24, and the proportions of cases involving concentrates (from 0 to 124 calls, 22%) and edibles increased (from nine calls, 5%, to 88 calls, 16%) (Box 2). Across the decade, concentrates (320 calls, 39%), plant-based cannabis (302 calls, 37%), and edibles (171 calls, 21%) were the three product forms most frequently involved in unintentional exposure calls (Supporting Information, table 1). Calls about exposures to edibles have increased rapidly since 2019–20, particularly gummy or lolly forms (89 cases, all reported since 2019–20) (Supporting Information, figure 2).</p><p>The number of calls to NSWPIC regarding cannabis poisoning increased significantly during 2014–24, but we found no trend change points, including during the 2015–16 re-scheduling of medicinal use products. Most prescribed cannabis use in Australia involves unapproved products permitted under the Special Access Scheme B (SAS-B).<span><sup>9</sup></span> Administrative hurdles may have prevented the rapid uptake of medicinal cannabis immediately after its legalisation; few SAS-B approvals were recorded during 2016–18, but the 2018 launch of a streamlined SAS-B portal system was followed by a dramatic increase in approval numbers.<span><sup>9</sup></span> Further, a 2019 survey found that only 3.9% of Australians who used cannabis for medicinal purposes obtained it on prescription.<span><sup>10</sup></span> The increase in exposure calls could therefore reflect a steady increase in cannabis use during 2014–24 because of changing social norms and perceptions of cannabis safety and legality. The more rapid increase in calls about exposures in young people could reflect the increasing availability of edible forms, which can be medically prescribed or obtained illicitly. This interpretation would be consistent with survey findings that about 15% of Australians who used cannabis for medicinal purposes used oral formulations in 2016 (ie, prior to its legalisation),<span><sup>11</sup></span> but 33% did so in 2022–23.<span><sup>12</sup></span></p><p>Limitations of our study include the fact that NSWPIC does not routinely undertake follow-up enquiries; final outcomes are consequently unknown. Information about the cannabis form is as reported by the caller, and was sometimes missing. Some exposures were to multiple substances, and symptoms and dispositions could therefore be related to substances other than cannabis. As the incidence of cannabinoid poisoning is relatively low, the number of calls was small. Further, we used Joinpoint to detect change points rather than for hypothesis testing; the low call numbers prior to 2016 limited the power of our analysis to detect statistically significant changes following re-scheduling.</p><p>We found that the number of cannabis poisonings reported increased significantly in Australia during 2014–24, particularly exposures of children and adolescents. The reported number of exposures to edibles, which pose a particular risk for young children,<span><sup>13</sup></span> has increased. Our findings are relevant to discussions of increasing access to medicinal cannabis and legalising its recreational use. Lessons learned overseas with different legislative models could be applied in Australia. For example, the sale of edibles is not permitted in some Canadian provinces, and significantly more children are hospitalised with cannabis intoxication in provinces where they are sold.<span><sup>2</sup></span> While using orally ingested cannabis forms may be less harmful in the long term than smoking cannabis, the acute poisoning risk posed by edible forms of cannabis must be considered. Particular caution needs to be applied to confectionery forms that are attractive for children.</p><p>Open access publishing facilitated by the University of Sydney, as part of the Wiley – the University of Sydney agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.</p><p>Rose Cairns has received honoraria and speaker fees from the Pharmacy Guild of Australia and Reckitt, and an untied educational grant from Reckitt (all unrelated to this article).</p><p>For privacy reasons, NSWPIC data cannot be shared without prior ethics approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"222 3","pages":"155-157"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52586","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several countries have legalised medicinal cannabis during the past two decades; more recently, some jurisdictions, including parts of the United States, Canada, and Uruguay, have legalised recreational cannabis.1 Legislative models differ between countries, particularly with regard to access to medicinal cannabis, commercialisation, the availability of cannabis dispensaries, and cannabis-containing confectionery (“edibles”).2

One potential harm of increased access to cannabis is poisoning. It is widely believed that cannabis is safe in overdose,3 but it can cause central nervous system (CNS) excitation, CNS depression, hallucinations, psychosis, and cardiac dysrhythmias.4 The risk of severe toxicity is greater for children, in whom it can lead to apnoea and coma; in one United States study, 32 of 60 children (0–10 years) hospitalised with cannabis intoxication required intensive care.5 Several studies have reported increases in the number of poisonings following medicinal and recreational cannabis legalisation, particularly in children.6 Edibles are particularly high risk products because of their palatability and the possibility of large ingestions.2 Most reports on this problem are from North America.6

In Australia, the medicinal use of cannabidiol (CBD) was legalised in June 2015, and that of cannabis and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in November 2016.7 We therefore evaluated recent cannabis poisoning exposures in Australia, stratified by ingestion intent, age group, and product type. We analysed data from the New South Wales Poisons Information Centre (NSWPIC), which receives about 50% of all calls to Australian poisons information centres; 65% of calls are from within NSW, 35% from other states.8 We extracted data on demographic and exposure characteristics, patient disposition, and cannabinoid product types for calls during 1 July 2014 – 30 June 2024. We calculated crude and age-adjusted population exposure call rates (Supporting Information, supplementary methods), and used Joinpoint regression (version 4.9.0.1) to estimate annual percentage changes (APCs) in age-adjusted rates and to detect trend change points. The study was approved by the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/ETH00165).

There were 3796 calls about cannabis poisoning exposures (2039 regarding exposures of boys or men, 54%) during 2014–24. The exposed person exhibited symptoms of poisoning at the time of the call in 3184 cases (84% of calls); 2783 people (74%) were in hospital at the time of the call or were referred to hospital (Supporting Information, table 1). The number of calls increased during 2014–24 by 12.8% per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3–15.4% per year), and no trend change points were detected (Box 1). Intentional cannabis exposures were reported by 2981 calls (79% of calls), and the number increased by 9.2% (95% CI, 6.3–12.2%) per year. Unintentional cannabis exposures were reported by 815 calls (21%), and the number increased by 30.0% (95% CI, 23.5–36.8%) per year (Box 1, Box 2).

The age-adjusted cannabis poisoning exposure rate was highest for adolescents (15–19 years; 11.4 calls per 100 000 population per year); the age-adjusted rate for unintentional exposures was highest for toddlers (1–4 years; 1.9 calls per 100 000 population per year) (Supporting Information, table 2).

Plant-based cannabis (ie, flower or leaf) was the reported exposure form in 2663 cases (70% of all cases) (Supporting Information, table 1); the proportion declined from 72% in 2014–15 to 61% in 2023–24, and the proportions of cases involving concentrates (from 0 to 124 calls, 22%) and edibles increased (from nine calls, 5%, to 88 calls, 16%) (Box 2). Across the decade, concentrates (320 calls, 39%), plant-based cannabis (302 calls, 37%), and edibles (171 calls, 21%) were the three product forms most frequently involved in unintentional exposure calls (Supporting Information, table 1). Calls about exposures to edibles have increased rapidly since 2019–20, particularly gummy or lolly forms (89 cases, all reported since 2019–20) (Supporting Information, figure 2).

The number of calls to NSWPIC regarding cannabis poisoning increased significantly during 2014–24, but we found no trend change points, including during the 2015–16 re-scheduling of medicinal use products. Most prescribed cannabis use in Australia involves unapproved products permitted under the Special Access Scheme B (SAS-B).9 Administrative hurdles may have prevented the rapid uptake of medicinal cannabis immediately after its legalisation; few SAS-B approvals were recorded during 2016–18, but the 2018 launch of a streamlined SAS-B portal system was followed by a dramatic increase in approval numbers.9 Further, a 2019 survey found that only 3.9% of Australians who used cannabis for medicinal purposes obtained it on prescription.10 The increase in exposure calls could therefore reflect a steady increase in cannabis use during 2014–24 because of changing social norms and perceptions of cannabis safety and legality. The more rapid increase in calls about exposures in young people could reflect the increasing availability of edible forms, which can be medically prescribed or obtained illicitly. This interpretation would be consistent with survey findings that about 15% of Australians who used cannabis for medicinal purposes used oral formulations in 2016 (ie, prior to its legalisation),11 but 33% did so in 2022–23.12

Limitations of our study include the fact that NSWPIC does not routinely undertake follow-up enquiries; final outcomes are consequently unknown. Information about the cannabis form is as reported by the caller, and was sometimes missing. Some exposures were to multiple substances, and symptoms and dispositions could therefore be related to substances other than cannabis. As the incidence of cannabinoid poisoning is relatively low, the number of calls was small. Further, we used Joinpoint to detect change points rather than for hypothesis testing; the low call numbers prior to 2016 limited the power of our analysis to detect statistically significant changes following re-scheduling.

We found that the number of cannabis poisonings reported increased significantly in Australia during 2014–24, particularly exposures of children and adolescents. The reported number of exposures to edibles, which pose a particular risk for young children,13 has increased. Our findings are relevant to discussions of increasing access to medicinal cannabis and legalising its recreational use. Lessons learned overseas with different legislative models could be applied in Australia. For example, the sale of edibles is not permitted in some Canadian provinces, and significantly more children are hospitalised with cannabis intoxication in provinces where they are sold.2 While using orally ingested cannabis forms may be less harmful in the long term than smoking cannabis, the acute poisoning risk posed by edible forms of cannabis must be considered. Particular caution needs to be applied to confectionery forms that are attractive for children.

Open access publishing facilitated by the University of Sydney, as part of the Wiley – the University of Sydney agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

Rose Cairns has received honoraria and speaker fees from the Pharmacy Guild of Australia and Reckitt, and an untied educational grant from Reckitt (all unrelated to this article).

For privacy reasons, NSWPIC data cannot be shared without prior ethics approval.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014-24年药用大麻合法化后澳大利亚的大麻中毒:新南威尔士州毒物信息中心数据分析。
在过去二十年中,一些国家已将医用大麻合法化;最近,一些司法管辖区,包括美国、加拿大和乌拉圭的部分地区,已经将娱乐性大麻合法化各国的立法模式各不相同,特别是在医用大麻的获取、商业化、大麻药房的供应和含大麻糖果(“可食用”)方面。越来越多地接触大麻的一个潜在危害是中毒。人们普遍认为,过量吸食大麻是安全的,但它会引起中枢神经系统兴奋、中枢神经系统抑制、幻觉、精神病和心律失常对儿童产生严重毒性的风险更大,可能导致呼吸暂停和昏迷;在美国的一项研究中,60名因大麻中毒住院的儿童(0-10岁)中有32名需要重症监护一些研究报告说,在药用和娱乐用大麻合法化之后,中毒人数有所增加,特别是在儿童中可食用食品是特别高风险的产品,因为它们的适口性和大量摄入的可能性在澳大利亚,大麻二酚(CBD)的药用于2015年6月合法化,大麻和四氢大麻酚(THC)的药用于2016年11月合法化。因此,我们评估了澳大利亚最近的大麻中毒暴露情况,按摄入意图、年龄组和产品类型分层。我们分析了新南威尔士州毒物信息中心(NSWPIC)的数据,该中心接收了澳大利亚毒物信息中心约50%的电话;65%的电话来自新南威尔士州,35%来自其他州我们提取了2014年7月1日至2024年6月30日期间呼叫的人口统计学和暴露特征、患者倾向和大麻素产品类型的数据。我们计算了粗糙的和年龄调整的人群暴露呼叫率(支持信息,补充方法),并使用Joinpoint回归(版本4.9.0.1)来估计年龄调整率的年百分比变化(APCs)并检测趋势变化点。该研究已获得悉尼儿童医院网络人类研究伦理委员会(2021/ETH00165)的批准。2014-24年期间,有3796个关于大麻中毒接触的电话(2039个关于男孩或男性接触,54%)。在3184个案例中(84%的案例),接触者在打电话时表现出中毒症状;2783人(74%)在打电话时住院或被转介到医院(支持信息,表1)。2014-24年期间,电话数量每年增加12.8%(95%置信区间[CI],每年10.3-15.4%),没有发现趋势变化点(方文1)。报告有意接触大麻的电话有2981个(79%的电话),每年增加9.2% (95% CI, 6.3-12.2%)。意外接触大麻的电话报告有815个(21%),每年增加30.0% (95% CI, 23.5-36.8%)(框1,框2)。年龄调整后的大麻中毒接触率最高的是青少年(15-19岁;每年每10万人呼叫11.4次);非故意接触的年龄调整率在幼儿中最高(1-4岁;(支持信息,表2)。2663例(占所有病例的70%)报告的暴露形式是植物性大麻(即花或叶)(支持信息,表1);这一比例从2014-15年的72%下降到2023-24年的61%,涉及浓缩物(从0个电话到124个电话,22%)和可食用物的案件比例增加(从9个电话,5%,到88个电话,16%)(表2)。在过去十年中,浓缩物(320个电话,39%)、植物性大麻(302个电话,37%)和可食用物(171个电话,21%)是三种最常涉及无意接触电话的产品形式(支持信息,表1)。自2019-20年以来,关于接触可食用食品的电话迅速增加,特别是胶状或棒棒糖形式(89例,均为2019-20年以来报告的)(支持信息,图2)。2014-24年期间,关于大麻中毒的NSWPIC电话数量显着增加,但我们没有发现趋势变化点,包括2015-16年药品重新安排期间。在澳大利亚,大多数处方大麻使用涉及特殊准入计划B (SAS-B)下允许的未经批准的产品行政障碍可能阻碍了医用大麻在合法化后立即被迅速吸收;2016-18年期间,很少有SAS-B批准记录,但2018年推出简化的SAS-B门户系统后,批准数量急剧增加此外,2019年的一项调查发现,只有3.9%将大麻用于医疗目的的澳大利亚人通过处方获得大麻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Extent and Nature of Lived Experience Engagement in the Development of Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2014–2025: A Scoping Review Population-Based Melanoma Screening Using Integrated Risk Scores in Australia: A Narrative Review to Determine Readiness Interval Cancer Characteristics, Staging and Survival Among National Bowel Cancer Screening Program Participants, Western Australia, 2018: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study The Association Between Access Block And Ambulance Ramping, And The Impact of COVID-19: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study of 25 Queensland Hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1