The Deadly Details: How Clear and Complete Are Publicly Available Sources of Human Rabies Information?

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.3390/tropicalmed10010016
Natalie Patane, Owen Eades, Jennifer Morris, Olivia Mac, Kirsten McCaffery, Sarah L McGuinness
{"title":"The Deadly Details: How Clear and Complete Are Publicly Available Sources of Human Rabies Information?","authors":"Natalie Patane, Owen Eades, Jennifer Morris, Olivia Mac, Kirsten McCaffery, Sarah L McGuinness","doi":"10.3390/tropicalmed10010016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human rabies is preventable but almost always fatal once symptoms appear, causing 59,000 global deaths each year. Limited awareness and inconsistent access to post-exposure prophylaxis hinder prevention efforts. To identify gaps and opportunities for improvement in online rabies information, we assessed the readability, understandability, actionability, and completeness of online public rabies resources from government and health agencies in Australia and similar countries, with the aim of identifying gaps and opportunities for improvement. We identified materials via Google and public health agency websites, assessing readability using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index and understandability and actionability with the Patient Education Materials Tool for Print materials (PEMAT-P). Completeness was assessed using a framework focused on general and vaccine-specific rabies information. An analysis of 22 resources found a median readability of grade 13 (range: 10-15), with a mean understandability of 66% and mean actionability of 60%; both below recommended thresholds. Mean completeness was 79% for general rabies information and 36% for vaccine-specific information. Visual aids were under-utilised, and critical vaccine-specific information was often lacking. These findings highlight significant barriers in rabies information for the public, with most resources requiring a high literacy level and lacking adequate understandability and actionability. Improving readability, adding visual aids, and enhancing vaccine-related content could improve accessibility and support wider prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23330,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11768519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10010016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human rabies is preventable but almost always fatal once symptoms appear, causing 59,000 global deaths each year. Limited awareness and inconsistent access to post-exposure prophylaxis hinder prevention efforts. To identify gaps and opportunities for improvement in online rabies information, we assessed the readability, understandability, actionability, and completeness of online public rabies resources from government and health agencies in Australia and similar countries, with the aim of identifying gaps and opportunities for improvement. We identified materials via Google and public health agency websites, assessing readability using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index and understandability and actionability with the Patient Education Materials Tool for Print materials (PEMAT-P). Completeness was assessed using a framework focused on general and vaccine-specific rabies information. An analysis of 22 resources found a median readability of grade 13 (range: 10-15), with a mean understandability of 66% and mean actionability of 60%; both below recommended thresholds. Mean completeness was 79% for general rabies information and 36% for vaccine-specific information. Visual aids were under-utilised, and critical vaccine-specific information was often lacking. These findings highlight significant barriers in rabies information for the public, with most resources requiring a high literacy level and lacking adequate understandability and actionability. Improving readability, adding visual aids, and enhancing vaccine-related content could improve accessibility and support wider prevention efforts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致命的细节:人类狂犬病信息的公开来源有多清晰和完整?
人类狂犬病是可以预防的,但一旦出现症状几乎总是致命的,每年在全球造成5.9万人死亡。接触后预防认识有限和获取途径不一致阻碍了预防工作。为了确定在线狂犬病信息的差距和改进机会,我们评估了澳大利亚和类似国家的政府和卫生机构的在线公共狂犬病资源的可读性、可理解性、可操作性和完整性,目的是确定差距和改进机会。我们通过谷歌和公共卫生机构网站确定材料,使用简单测量的Gobbledygook (SMOG)指数评估可读性,并使用打印材料患者教育材料工具(PEMAT-P)评估可理解性和可操作性。使用侧重于一般和疫苗特异性狂犬病信息的框架评估完整性。对22个资源的分析发现,平均可读性为13级(范围:10-15),平均可理解性为66%,平均可操作性为60%;都低于建议的阈值。一般狂犬病信息的平均完整性为79%,疫苗特异性信息的平均完整性为36%。视觉辅助工具没有得到充分利用,而且往往缺乏针对疫苗的关键信息。这些发现突出了公众在狂犬病信息方面的重大障碍,大多数资源需要较高的识字水平,缺乏足够的可理解性和可操作性。提高可读性、增加视觉辅助和加强疫苗相关内容可以改善可及性并支持更广泛的预防工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
353
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Brucellosis Seroprevalence, Analysis of Risk Factors, and Comparison of Test Methods Used in Diagnosis in a Tertiary Hospital in Kahramanmaraş. Evaluating Treatment and Safety Outcomes of a Shorter Regimen for Drug-Resistant TB in Nigeria: An Implementation Research Study. Programmatic Results of Integrating Systematic TB Screening Across Diverse Outpatient Health System Entry Points in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Global Temporal Trends and Projections of Acute Hepatitis E Epidemiology for Adults 65 Years and Older from 1990 to 2021: Global Burden of Disease 2021 Based Study. Thyroid Tuberculosis Abscess: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Pathways and Management Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1