Measuring Debilitating and Facilitating Anxiety Within Nursing Simulation.

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING Nursing Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.3390/nursrep15010001
Janet M Reed, Tracy Dodson, Lynette Phillips, Amy Petrinec
{"title":"Measuring Debilitating and Facilitating Anxiety Within Nursing Simulation.","authors":"Janet M Reed, Tracy Dodson, Lynette Phillips, Amy Petrinec","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety in simulations can be influenced by various factors that either motivate or immobilize students. Understanding simulation anxiety is crucial for educators to design appropriately challenging scenarios without overwhelming students. No instruments have yet been tested to differentiate between debilitating and facilitating anxiety within nursing simulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative repeated measures design was used to examine students' baseline and pre-simulation anxiety with 90 pre-licensure junior level nursing students. The Achievement Anxiety Test (AAT) was administered to differentiate levels of debilitating and facilitating anxiety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The revised AAT demonstrated preliminary validity and reliability for measuring debilitating and facilitating anxiety when used in nursing simulation. Linear regression showed only debilitating anxiety significantly predicted pre-simulation state anxiety. Baseline anxiety has a significant impact on students, increasing debilitating anxiety in simulated settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To ensure success in practice settings, it is important to address students baseline anxiety to support a successful transition into practice. This study was prospectively determined to be exempt with the University's Institutional Review Board on 6 December 2022 and was not prospectively registered in a formal registry.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11767242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety in simulations can be influenced by various factors that either motivate or immobilize students. Understanding simulation anxiety is crucial for educators to design appropriately challenging scenarios without overwhelming students. No instruments have yet been tested to differentiate between debilitating and facilitating anxiety within nursing simulations.

Methods: A quantitative repeated measures design was used to examine students' baseline and pre-simulation anxiety with 90 pre-licensure junior level nursing students. The Achievement Anxiety Test (AAT) was administered to differentiate levels of debilitating and facilitating anxiety.

Results: The revised AAT demonstrated preliminary validity and reliability for measuring debilitating and facilitating anxiety when used in nursing simulation. Linear regression showed only debilitating anxiety significantly predicted pre-simulation state anxiety. Baseline anxiety has a significant impact on students, increasing debilitating anxiety in simulated settings.

Conclusions: To ensure success in practice settings, it is important to address students baseline anxiety to support a successful transition into practice. This study was prospectively determined to be exempt with the University's Institutional Review Board on 6 December 2022 and was not prospectively registered in a formal registry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge Assessment of Hospital Nursing Staff in Saudi Arabia Regarding Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. The Benefits of Caring Massage® for Patients and Nurses: A Delphi Study. Bridging the Gap: A Phenomenological Study of Transfer Students' Journey into Professional Nursing. A Scoping Review Protocol: Parenting Experiences and Family Dynamics in Pediatric Burn Care Settings from Hospitalization to the Return Home. Vocation of Human Care and Soft Skills in Nursing and Physiotherapy Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1