Measuring Debilitating and Facilitating Anxiety Within Nursing Simulation.

IF 2 Q1 NURSING Nursing Reports Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.3390/nursrep15010001
Janet M Reed, Tracy Dodson, Lynette Phillips, Amy Petrinec
{"title":"Measuring Debilitating and Facilitating Anxiety Within Nursing Simulation.","authors":"Janet M Reed, Tracy Dodson, Lynette Phillips, Amy Petrinec","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety in simulations can be influenced by various factors that either motivate or immobilize students. Understanding simulation anxiety is crucial for educators to design appropriately challenging scenarios without overwhelming students. No instruments have yet been tested to differentiate between debilitating and facilitating anxiety within nursing simulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative repeated measures design was used to examine students' baseline and pre-simulation anxiety with 90 pre-licensure junior level nursing students. The Achievement Anxiety Test (AAT) was administered to differentiate levels of debilitating and facilitating anxiety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The revised AAT demonstrated preliminary validity and reliability for measuring debilitating and facilitating anxiety when used in nursing simulation. Linear regression showed only debilitating anxiety significantly predicted pre-simulation state anxiety. Baseline anxiety has a significant impact on students, increasing debilitating anxiety in simulated settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To ensure success in practice settings, it is important to address students baseline anxiety to support a successful transition into practice. This study was prospectively determined to be exempt with the University's Institutional Review Board on 6 December 2022 and was not prospectively registered in a formal registry.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11767242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anxiety in simulations can be influenced by various factors that either motivate or immobilize students. Understanding simulation anxiety is crucial for educators to design appropriately challenging scenarios without overwhelming students. No instruments have yet been tested to differentiate between debilitating and facilitating anxiety within nursing simulations.

Methods: A quantitative repeated measures design was used to examine students' baseline and pre-simulation anxiety with 90 pre-licensure junior level nursing students. The Achievement Anxiety Test (AAT) was administered to differentiate levels of debilitating and facilitating anxiety.

Results: The revised AAT demonstrated preliminary validity and reliability for measuring debilitating and facilitating anxiety when used in nursing simulation. Linear regression showed only debilitating anxiety significantly predicted pre-simulation state anxiety. Baseline anxiety has a significant impact on students, increasing debilitating anxiety in simulated settings.

Conclusions: To ensure success in practice settings, it is important to address students baseline anxiety to support a successful transition into practice. This study was prospectively determined to be exempt with the University's Institutional Review Board on 6 December 2022 and was not prospectively registered in a formal registry.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在护理模拟中测量衰弱和促进焦虑。
背景:模拟中的焦虑可以受到各种因素的影响,这些因素可以激励学生,也可以抑制学生。了解模拟焦虑对于教育工作者设计适当的具有挑战性的场景而不让学生感到压力是至关重要的。在护理模拟中,还没有测试过仪器来区分使人衰弱和促进焦虑。方法:采用定量重复测量设计,对90名初级护理专业预科生进行基线焦虑和模拟前焦虑的检测。使用成就焦虑测试(AAT)来区分衰弱焦虑和促进焦虑的水平。结果:修订后的AAT在护理模拟中测量衰弱性焦虑和促进性焦虑具有初步的效度和信度。线性回归显示,只有衰弱焦虑显著预测模拟前状态焦虑。基线焦虑对学生有重大影响,在模拟环境中增加了使人衰弱的焦虑。结论:为了确保在实践环境中取得成功,重要的是要解决学生的基线焦虑,以支持成功过渡到实践。该研究于2022年12月6日被大学机构审查委员会前瞻性地确定为豁免,并且没有在正式注册中进行前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Innovations in Nursing Education, Practice and Research: Emphasising Health Literacy. Adequacy of the Type of Venous Catheter to the Drug Type and Duration of Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study. Self-Efficacy and Caregiving Competence in Family Caregivers of Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy: A Correlational Study. Codesigning a Nurse-Led, Large Language Model-Empowered Agent to Increase Hepatitis B Screening and Vaccination for Inclusion Health Populations: A Research Protocol. Assessing Nursing Students' Readiness to Address Sexual Health: Psychometric and A Mixed-Method Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1