Individualized symptom experience and predictors in cancer patients after oesophagectomy: A latent profile analysis

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING European Journal of Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102806
Xuanxuan Ma, Yaping Ge, Xue Zhang, Shaoxue Li, Shuwen Li
{"title":"Individualized symptom experience and predictors in cancer patients after oesophagectomy: A latent profile analysis","authors":"Xuanxuan Ma,&nbsp;Yaping Ge,&nbsp;Xue Zhang,&nbsp;Shaoxue Li,&nbsp;Shuwen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In the care for oesophageal cancer, symptom assessment was mainly carried out from the perspective of the total score using scales, which ignored individual differences in symptom experience among patients. To provide personalized symptom management, individual differences among patients with oesophageal cancer warranted further investigation. The objective was to identify the different symptom profiles of patients after oesophagectomy and examine the risk factors affecting the symptom profiles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>It was a descriptive study with cross-sectional design. A total of 258 participants were recruited. Latent profile analysis was used to identify different profile of symptoms, and multiple logistic regression was used to identify risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three distinct profiles were identified: the \"complex symptoms group\" (32.6%), the \"throat symptoms group\" (25.2%), and the \"single fatigue group\" (42.2%). Patients with higher prognostic nutritional index (OR = 0.797), higher resilience scale score (OR = 0.907), living in city or town (OR = 0.396), and stage II cancer (OR = 0.413) were more likely to be classified as \"single fatigue group\". Patients with higher prognostic nutritional index (OR = 1.233) and cervical anastomosis (OR = 4.586) tended to be classified as the \"throat symptoms group\". Unemployed patients (OR = 0.204) tended to belong to the \"complex symptoms group,\" whereas patients with higher prognostic nutritional index were less likely to be in the \"complex symptoms group.\"</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Individual differences existed in the symptom experience of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal cancer. Precise symptom management programs should be designed and implemented according to the individualized characteristics of the patient's symptom experience to promote patients' recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388925000304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In the care for oesophageal cancer, symptom assessment was mainly carried out from the perspective of the total score using scales, which ignored individual differences in symptom experience among patients. To provide personalized symptom management, individual differences among patients with oesophageal cancer warranted further investigation. The objective was to identify the different symptom profiles of patients after oesophagectomy and examine the risk factors affecting the symptom profiles.

Methods

It was a descriptive study with cross-sectional design. A total of 258 participants were recruited. Latent profile analysis was used to identify different profile of symptoms, and multiple logistic regression was used to identify risk factors.

Results

Three distinct profiles were identified: the "complex symptoms group" (32.6%), the "throat symptoms group" (25.2%), and the "single fatigue group" (42.2%). Patients with higher prognostic nutritional index (OR = 0.797), higher resilience scale score (OR = 0.907), living in city or town (OR = 0.396), and stage II cancer (OR = 0.413) were more likely to be classified as "single fatigue group". Patients with higher prognostic nutritional index (OR = 1.233) and cervical anastomosis (OR = 4.586) tended to be classified as the "throat symptoms group". Unemployed patients (OR = 0.204) tended to belong to the "complex symptoms group," whereas patients with higher prognostic nutritional index were less likely to be in the "complex symptoms group."

Conclusion

Individual differences existed in the symptom experience of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal cancer. Precise symptom management programs should be designed and implemented according to the individualized characteristics of the patient's symptom experience to promote patients' recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食道切除术后癌症患者个体化症状经历和预测因素:一项潜在剖面分析。
目的:在食管癌的护理中,主要采用量表从总分角度进行症状评估,忽略了患者症状体验的个体差异。为了提供个性化的症状管理,食管癌患者的个体差异值得进一步研究。目的是确定食管切除术后患者的不同症状特征,并检查影响症状特征的危险因素。方法:采用横断面设计的描述性研究。总共招募了258名参与者。潜在特征分析用于识别不同症状特征,多元逻辑回归用于识别危险因素。结果:确定了三种不同的特征:“复杂症状组”(32.6%)、“咽喉症状组”(25.2%)和“单一疲劳组”(42.2%)。预后营养指数较高(OR = 0.797)、恢复力量表评分较高(OR = 0.907)、居住在城市或城镇(OR = 0.396)、II期癌症(OR = 0.413)的患者更容易被归为“单一疲劳组”。预后营养指数较高(OR = 1.233)、颈部吻合度较高(OR = 4.586)的患者倾向于归为“咽喉症状组”。失业患者(OR = 0.204)倾向于属于“复杂症状组”,而预后营养指数较高的患者不太可能属于“复杂症状组”。结论:食管癌手术患者的症状体验存在个体差异。根据患者症状体验的个体化特点,设计实施精准的症状管理方案,促进患者康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
期刊最新文献
Pancreatic cancer quality of care index trends, socioeconomic disparities, and future projections (1990-2035): A global epidemiological study. The differential effects of social support on quality of life in head and neck cancer patients in the United States and China. The mediating role of the intimate relationship between dyadic coping and reproductive concerns in couples of childbearing age facing breast cancer: A cross-sectional study. Substantive theory of family resilience among couples dealing with prostate cancer: A grounded theory study. Dissimilarities of illness perception among breast cancer patients and spouses: a longitudinal exploration of relations to dyads' illness management behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1