Specialty laboratory testing for chronic abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1080/00365521.2025.2456491
Michael Cymbal, Arjun Chatterjee, Patricia Ajayi-Fox, Ruishen Lyu, Moises Auron, Brian B Baggott
{"title":"Specialty laboratory testing for chronic abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome.","authors":"Michael Cymbal, Arjun Chatterjee, Patricia Ajayi-Fox, Ruishen Lyu, Moises Auron, Brian B Baggott","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2025.2456491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder seen by both primary care providers (PCPs) and gastroenterologists, and further diagnostic testing is generally discouraged unless red-flag symptoms are present.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Examine if advanced serologic testing for chronic abdominal pain in IBS patients followed society-specific guidelines and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of adults aged 18 and older who were seen at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Tests included: C1 esterase inhibitor, MEFV gene, urine porphobilinogen, anti-dsDNA, and heavy metal screening. Patients with preexisting rheumatological conditions or diagnoses such as hereditary angioedema, porphyria, familial Mediterranean fever, or lead poisoning were excluded. An appropriateness scale based on disease-specific guidelines was used to evaluate test suitability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 26,732 IBS patients, 143 underwent advanced laboratory testing, with 85.3% ordered by gastroenterologists. Only 12.5% of tests adhered to society-specific guidelines, and the positive test rate was 2.1%. The total cost of testing was $46,542, with $39,007 spent on tests deemed inappropriate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings emphasize the effectiveness and importance of adhering to Rome IV criteria, as advanced testing often fails to improve diagnostic accuracy and increases unnecessary healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"248-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2456491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder seen by both primary care providers (PCPs) and gastroenterologists, and further diagnostic testing is generally discouraged unless red-flag symptoms are present.

Aims: Examine if advanced serologic testing for chronic abdominal pain in IBS patients followed society-specific guidelines and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

Methods: The study involved a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of adults aged 18 and older who were seen at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Tests included: C1 esterase inhibitor, MEFV gene, urine porphobilinogen, anti-dsDNA, and heavy metal screening. Patients with preexisting rheumatological conditions or diagnoses such as hereditary angioedema, porphyria, familial Mediterranean fever, or lead poisoning were excluded. An appropriateness scale based on disease-specific guidelines was used to evaluate test suitability.

Results: Among 26,732 IBS patients, 143 underwent advanced laboratory testing, with 85.3% ordered by gastroenterologists. Only 12.5% of tests adhered to society-specific guidelines, and the positive test rate was 2.1%. The total cost of testing was $46,542, with $39,007 spent on tests deemed inappropriate.

Conclusions: The findings emphasize the effectiveness and importance of adhering to Rome IV criteria, as advanced testing often fails to improve diagnostic accuracy and increases unnecessary healthcare costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:肠易激综合征(IBS)是初级保健提供者(PCP)和胃肠病学家常见的胃肠道疾病,一般不鼓励进行进一步的诊断检测,除非出现红旗症状。目的:研究IBS患者慢性腹痛的高级血清学检测是否遵循社会特定指南,并评估这些检测的诊断准确性:该研究对 2013 年至 2018 年期间在我院就诊的 18 岁及以上成年人进行了回顾性横断面分析。检测项目包括C1酯酶抑制剂、MEFV基因、尿卟啉原、抗dsDNA和重金属筛查。排除了已有风湿病或遗传性血管性水肿、卟啉症、家族性地中海热或铅中毒等诊断的患者。根据特定疾病指南制定的适宜性量表用于评估检测的适宜性:结果:在26732名肠易激综合征患者中,有143人接受了先进的实验室检测,其中85.3%的检测由消化科医生下达。只有12.5%的检验符合社会特定指南,阳性检验率为2.1%。化验总费用为 46,542 美元,其中 39,007 美元用于不适当的化验:研究结果强调了遵守罗马IV标准的有效性和重要性,因为先进的检测往往不能提高诊断准确性,反而会增加不必要的医疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
期刊最新文献
Economic evaluation of preventing gastric cancer by eliminating Helicobacter pylori infection in China. Health-related quality of life at diagnosis and follow-up in Faroese and Danish patients with inflammatory bowel disease - a Faroese IBD cohort study. Specialty laboratory testing for chronic abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome. Prescription of commonly used drugs in patients with functional bowel disorders. A cross-sectional comparison with the general population. The diagnostic accuracy of plasma and serum calprotectin is inferior to C-reactive protein in patients with suspected Crohn's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1