Assessment for Enteral Feeding Intolerance by Critical Care Nurses: A National Survey.

Jan Powers, Annette M Bourgault, Jennifer S Carroll Simmons
{"title":"Assessment for Enteral Feeding Intolerance by Critical Care Nurses: A National Survey.","authors":"Jan Powers, Annette M Bourgault, Jennifer S Carroll Simmons","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) occurs in more than one-third of mechanically ventilated patients, yet the cause of this gastrointestinal dysfunction remains unclear. Assessment and diagnostic criteria are often vague and subjective leading to inaccurate recognition or diagnosis of EFI. Nurses are often unsure or unaware of appropriate assessment methods.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this descriptive study was to determine current practice for assessment of EFI among critical care nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national survey to explore EFI assessment practices was conducted with critical care nurses at the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses National Teaching Institute conference in 2022. Nurses completed a 19-item survey to determine assessment practices for EFI among critical care nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 344 nurses completed the survey. The majority of nurses practiced direct care at the bedside for adult critical care patients, held a bachelor's degree, had 6 to 15 years of nursing experience, and held specialty certification. There was variability among responses to the practice questions in the survey. Seventy-eight percent of the nurses were aware of and had cared for patients with EFI. EFI was assessed by 84% of participants. The most common assessment criterion for EFI was nausea and vomiting. The majority (81%) of respondents measured gastric residual volume routinely or sometimes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study shows assessment of EFI is not standardized among nurses. This study identifies a need for education about EFI given the lack of understanding of EFI. Findings from this study can be used to inform future research to develop best methods for assessing the presence of EFI.</p>","PeriodicalId":46646,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","volume":"44 2","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) occurs in more than one-third of mechanically ventilated patients, yet the cause of this gastrointestinal dysfunction remains unclear. Assessment and diagnostic criteria are often vague and subjective leading to inaccurate recognition or diagnosis of EFI. Nurses are often unsure or unaware of appropriate assessment methods.

Objectives: The objective of this descriptive study was to determine current practice for assessment of EFI among critical care nurses.

Methods: A national survey to explore EFI assessment practices was conducted with critical care nurses at the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses National Teaching Institute conference in 2022. Nurses completed a 19-item survey to determine assessment practices for EFI among critical care nurses.

Results: A total of 344 nurses completed the survey. The majority of nurses practiced direct care at the bedside for adult critical care patients, held a bachelor's degree, had 6 to 15 years of nursing experience, and held specialty certification. There was variability among responses to the practice questions in the survey. Seventy-eight percent of the nurses were aware of and had cared for patients with EFI. EFI was assessed by 84% of participants. The most common assessment criterion for EFI was nausea and vomiting. The majority (81%) of respondents measured gastric residual volume routinely or sometimes.

Discussion: This study shows assessment of EFI is not standardized among nurses. This study identifies a need for education about EFI given the lack of understanding of EFI. Findings from this study can be used to inform future research to develop best methods for assessing the presence of EFI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症护理护士肠内喂养不耐受评估:一项全国调查。
背景:肠内喂养不耐受(EFI)发生在超过三分之一的机械通气患者中,但这种胃肠功能障碍的原因尚不清楚。评估和诊断标准往往是模糊和主观的,导致对EFI的识别或诊断不准确。护士往往不确定或不知道适当的评估方法。目的:本描述性研究的目的是确定目前在重症护理护士中评估EFI的做法。方法:在2022年美国重症护理协会国家教学学会会议上,对重症护理护士进行了一项全国性调查,探讨EFI评估的实践。护士完成了一项19项的调查,以确定在重症护理护士中EFI的评估做法。结果:共344名护士完成调查。大多数护士在床边直接护理成人重症患者,拥有学士学位,有6到15年的护理经验,并持有专业证书。调查中练习题的回答各不相同。78%的护士知道并照顾过EFI患者。84%的参与者评估了EFI。EFI最常见的评估标准是恶心和呕吐。大多数(81%)的应答者定期或有时测量胃残余体积。讨论:本研究显示护士对EFI的评估不规范。鉴于缺乏对电喷的理解,本研究确定了对电喷进行教育的必要性。本研究的发现可用于为未来的研究提供信息,以开发评估EFI存在的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing™ is to provide nurses with accurate, current, and relevant information and services to excel in critical care practice.
期刊最新文献
Improving Timeliness of Palliative Care Referrals Within the ICU: A Quality Improvement Project. What Do Pediatric Intensive Care Nurses Know About Pediatric Delirium? Risk Factors and Occurrence of Medical Adhesive-related Skin Injuries and Medical Device-related Pressure Ulcers With Fixing Endotracheal Tubes With Medical Adhesive Tape. In the Times of Scarcity. Mapping the Applications and Impacts of Virtual Reality in Critical Care: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1