Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Compliance: A Multicentre Point Prevalence Study.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2025.01.014
Yasemin Çakır Kıymaz, Taliha Karakök, Merve Büyükkörük, Barış Manavlı, Cihad Baysal, Muhammed Fatih Karaşın, Merve Türker Işık, Kübra Erbay, Levent Şensoy, Eren Öztürk, Hasan Selçuk Özger, Derya Korkmaz, Sıla Akhan, Alpay Azap
{"title":"Evaluation of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Compliance: A Multicentre Point Prevalence Study.","authors":"Yasemin Çakır Kıymaz, Taliha Karakök, Merve Büyükkörük, Barış Manavlı, Cihad Baysal, Muhammed Fatih Karaşın, Merve Türker Işık, Kübra Erbay, Levent Şensoy, Eren Öztürk, Hasan Selçuk Özger, Derya Korkmaz, Sıla Akhan, Alpay Azap","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine the frequency of compliance with surgical prophylaxis in Turkey and to identify the causes and risk factors for non-compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center, prospective, point prevalence study was conducted in eight hospitals from different regions of Turkey. Patients over 18 years who underwent surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in all hospital surgical units were included in the study. The SAP compliance assessment was carried out under five headings; unnecessary prophylaxis, inappropriate drug choice, prolonged prophylaxis, inappropriate dose interval, and inappropriate dosage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 541 patients from 8 centers. 52.7% (n=285) were female and the median age was 54 years (min-max: 18-94). Orthopedics (23.7%, n=128), general surgery (22.2%, n=120), and obstetrics and gynecology (14.6%, n=79) were the most common specialties. SAP compliance was 14%. The specialty with the highest rate of inappropriate SAP was orthopedics (97%, n=124/128) and the lowest rate was in ophthalmology (25%, n=2). The most common causes of inappropriate surgical prophylaxis were prolonged prophylaxis (92.0%, n=299) and inappropriate dose interval (84.6%, n=275). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that prolonged surgical time, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score 3, and some specialties increased the risk of non-compliance with surgical prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that SAP compliance is low in Turkey and that inappropriateness is caused mostly by prolonged and inappropriate antimicrobial use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.01.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine the frequency of compliance with surgical prophylaxis in Turkey and to identify the causes and risk factors for non-compliance.

Methods: This multi-center, prospective, point prevalence study was conducted in eight hospitals from different regions of Turkey. Patients over 18 years who underwent surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in all hospital surgical units were included in the study. The SAP compliance assessment was carried out under five headings; unnecessary prophylaxis, inappropriate drug choice, prolonged prophylaxis, inappropriate dose interval, and inappropriate dosage.

Results: The study included 541 patients from 8 centers. 52.7% (n=285) were female and the median age was 54 years (min-max: 18-94). Orthopedics (23.7%, n=128), general surgery (22.2%, n=120), and obstetrics and gynecology (14.6%, n=79) were the most common specialties. SAP compliance was 14%. The specialty with the highest rate of inappropriate SAP was orthopedics (97%, n=124/128) and the lowest rate was in ophthalmology (25%, n=2). The most common causes of inappropriate surgical prophylaxis were prolonged prophylaxis (92.0%, n=299) and inappropriate dose interval (84.6%, n=275). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that prolonged surgical time, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score 3, and some specialties increased the risk of non-compliance with surgical prophylaxis.

Conclusion: Our study showed that SAP compliance is low in Turkey and that inappropriateness is caused mostly by prolonged and inappropriate antimicrobial use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Novel color additive for disinfectant wipes and room cleanliness and turnover time: Correspondence. Response to some comments on the efficiency and simulation of Thailand's Chiang Mai University model for COVID-19 mass vaccination hub. Response to the letter to the editor regarding "The impact of a novel color additive for disinfectant wipes on room cleanliness and turnover time". Some comments on the efficiency and simulation of Thailand's Chiang Mai University model for COVID-19 mass vaccination hub. Oral care in nonventilated hospitalized patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1