Evaluation value of contrast enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters in ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation-a prospectively study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04761-3
Ying Feng, Li Li, Wanwan Wen, Xiangdong Hu, Linxue Qian, Yujiang Liu, Zhanxiong Yi, Enhui He, Ruifang Xu
{"title":"Evaluation value of contrast enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters in ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation-a prospectively study.","authors":"Ying Feng, Li Li, Wanwan Wen, Xiangdong Hu, Linxue Qian, Yujiang Liu, Zhanxiong Yi, Enhui He, Ruifang Xu","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04761-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the evaluation value of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative parameters in ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation to assist its early-diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent liver transplantation and intravenous CEUS at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 25, 2020 to December 28, 2022 and were diagnosed with Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBLs) by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC) were prospectively enrolled. SonoLiver software was used to quantitatively analyze the contrast images, transplanted livers with normal biliary tracts as the control group. SPSS 25.0 software was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a total of 35 patients enrolled in the study, and 15 ITBLs and 30 normal biliary tract of transplanted livers, respectively. The dynamic vascular patterns (DVP) curve of the ITBLs group was negative wave, while the DVP curve of the normal biliary tract group was positive wave. Compared with the patients with normal biliary tract, the Maximum intensity (IMAX), Rise slope 50% (Rs50), Area under curve (AUC), Area under curve in Wash-in phase (WinAUC), Wash in Rate (WinR), Rise slope 10-90% (Rs1090), and Wash out Rate (WouR) of the ITBLs group were lower, while the Fall slope (Fs50) was higher. There was no significant difference in Rise time (RT), Time to Peak (TTP), Fall half time (FHT), Mean transit time (mTT), Fall time (FT), WioAUC ((WioAUC = WinAUC + WouAUC)), and Area under curve in Wash-out phase (WouAUC) between the two groups (P > 0.05). The ROC curve results showed that Fs50 > -2.64 was the cutoff value for predicting ITBLs, with an area under the curve of 0.816 (95%CI: 0.683-0.949), and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.846 and 0.607; Rs50 < 7.08, AUC < 39761.7050, WinR < 101.7 and WouR < 474.52 were the cutoff values ​​for predicting ITBLs, with areas under the curve of 0.853 (95%CI: 0.728-0.979), 0.911 (95%CI: 0.783-1.000), 0.756 (95%CI: 0.615-0.896) and 0.700 (95%CI: 0.536-0.864).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quantitative parameters of CEUS imaging, such as IMAX, Rs50, AUC, WinAUC, WinR, Rs1090, WouR, and Fs50, are helpful in predicting ITBLs and improving the reproducibility of diagnosis. The threshold of these quantitative parameters will aid in the early diagnosis of ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04761-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the evaluation value of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative parameters in ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation to assist its early-diagnosis.

Methods: Patients who underwent liver transplantation and intravenous CEUS at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 25, 2020 to December 28, 2022 and were diagnosed with Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBLs) by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC) were prospectively enrolled. SonoLiver software was used to quantitatively analyze the contrast images, transplanted livers with normal biliary tracts as the control group. SPSS 25.0 software was used to analyze the data.

Results: There was a total of 35 patients enrolled in the study, and 15 ITBLs and 30 normal biliary tract of transplanted livers, respectively. The dynamic vascular patterns (DVP) curve of the ITBLs group was negative wave, while the DVP curve of the normal biliary tract group was positive wave. Compared with the patients with normal biliary tract, the Maximum intensity (IMAX), Rise slope 50% (Rs50), Area under curve (AUC), Area under curve in Wash-in phase (WinAUC), Wash in Rate (WinR), Rise slope 10-90% (Rs1090), and Wash out Rate (WouR) of the ITBLs group were lower, while the Fall slope (Fs50) was higher. There was no significant difference in Rise time (RT), Time to Peak (TTP), Fall half time (FHT), Mean transit time (mTT), Fall time (FT), WioAUC ((WioAUC = WinAUC + WouAUC)), and Area under curve in Wash-out phase (WouAUC) between the two groups (P > 0.05). The ROC curve results showed that Fs50 > -2.64 was the cutoff value for predicting ITBLs, with an area under the curve of 0.816 (95%CI: 0.683-0.949), and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.846 and 0.607; Rs50 < 7.08, AUC < 39761.7050, WinR < 101.7 and WouR < 474.52 were the cutoff values ​​for predicting ITBLs, with areas under the curve of 0.853 (95%CI: 0.728-0.979), 0.911 (95%CI: 0.783-1.000), 0.756 (95%CI: 0.615-0.896) and 0.700 (95%CI: 0.536-0.864).

Conclusion: The quantitative parameters of CEUS imaging, such as IMAX, Rs50, AUC, WinAUC, WinR, Rs1090, WouR, and Fs50, are helpful in predicting ITBLs and improving the reproducibility of diagnosis. The threshold of these quantitative parameters will aid in the early diagnosis of ischemic-type biliary lesions after liver transplantation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
LI-RADS for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced US with SonoVue and Sonazoid-a single center prospective study. Ovarian masses suggested for MRI examination: assessment of deep learning models based on non-contrast-enhanced MRI sequences for predicting malignancy. Percutaneous management of iatrogenic ureteral injuries using a multistep approach: clinical, functional and long-term outcomes. Adolescent endometriosis: clinical insights and imaging considerations. Artificial intelligence for abdominopelvic trauma imaging: trends, gaps, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1