Usefulness of urinary biomarker-based risk score and multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naïve patients

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04727-5
Jurate Kemesiene, Carlos Nicolau, Gytis Cholstauskas, Kristina Zviniene, Mantvydas Lopeta, Simona Veneviciute, Ieva Asmenaviciute, Kamile Tamosauskaite, Ingrida Pikuniene, Mindaugas Jievaltas
{"title":"Usefulness of urinary biomarker-based risk score and multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naïve patients","authors":"Jurate Kemesiene,&nbsp;Carlos Nicolau,&nbsp;Gytis Cholstauskas,&nbsp;Kristina Zviniene,&nbsp;Mantvydas Lopeta,&nbsp;Simona Veneviciute,&nbsp;Ieva Asmenaviciute,&nbsp;Kamile Tamosauskaite,&nbsp;Ingrida Pikuniene,&nbsp;Mindaugas Jievaltas","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04727-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), genetic urinary test (GUT), and prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator version 2.0 (PCPTRC2) for the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnostic in biopsy-naïve patients.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In a single center study between 2021 and 2024 participants underwent prostate mpMRI, GUT, and ultrasound (US) guided biopsy. The csPCa risk was calculated using PCPTRC2. After conducting a digital rectal examination (DRE), a GUT was performed. It incorporated the RNA levels of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) gene and ETS-related gene (ERG) fusion genes (T: E), along with the patient’s age and PSA density. The McNemar test compared detection rates between modalities.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>208 (mean age 62.9 years +/- 8.2) men were included prospectively. A positive GUT score was found in 67.8% and PIRADS ≥3 in 81.7% of all cases. The combination of GUT with mpMRI showed significantly higher sensitivity (99.1%) than GUT and mpMRI alone, 84.4% and 93.8%, respectively (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). Similarly, very high sensitivity (99.0%) was achieved by combining mpMRI with PCPTCR2. Nevertheless, mpMRI plus GUT combination exceeded mpMRI plus PCPTCR2 by allowing to save a higher fraction of unnecessary biopsies, 25% and 2.4%, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>GUT and mpMRI combination would allow saving a substantial fraction of unnecessary biopsies with minimal risk of missing csPCa cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 8","pages":"3816 - 3826"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-024-04727-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), genetic urinary test (GUT), and prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator version 2.0 (PCPTRC2) for the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnostic in biopsy-naïve patients.

Materials and methods

In a single center study between 2021 and 2024 participants underwent prostate mpMRI, GUT, and ultrasound (US) guided biopsy. The csPCa risk was calculated using PCPTRC2. After conducting a digital rectal examination (DRE), a GUT was performed. It incorporated the RNA levels of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) gene and ETS-related gene (ERG) fusion genes (T: E), along with the patient’s age and PSA density. The McNemar test compared detection rates between modalities.

Results

208 (mean age 62.9 years +/- 8.2) men were included prospectively. A positive GUT score was found in 67.8% and PIRADS ≥3 in 81.7% of all cases. The combination of GUT with mpMRI showed significantly higher sensitivity (99.1%) than GUT and mpMRI alone, 84.4% and 93.8%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Similarly, very high sensitivity (99.0%) was achieved by combining mpMRI with PCPTCR2. Nevertheless, mpMRI plus GUT combination exceeded mpMRI plus PCPTCR2 by allowing to save a higher fraction of unnecessary biopsies, 25% and 2.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

GUT and mpMRI combination would allow saving a substantial fraction of unnecessary biopsies with minimal risk of missing csPCa cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于尿液生物标志物的风险评分和多参数MRI对biopsy-naïve患者临床意义的前列腺癌检测的有用性
目的:本研究旨在探讨多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)、遗传尿检(GUT)和前列腺癌预防试验风险计算器2.0版(PCPTRC2)对biopsy-naïve患者临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)诊断的准确性。材料和方法:在2021年至2024年的一项单中心研究中,参与者接受了前列腺mpMRI、GUT和超声(US)引导活检。使用PCPTRC2计算csPCa风险。在进行直肠指检(DRE)后,进行肠梗阻检查。它结合了前列腺癌抗原3 (PCA3)和跨膜丝氨酸蛋白酶2 (TMPRSS2)基因和ets相关基因(ERG)融合基因(T: E)的RNA水平,以及患者的年龄和PSA密度。McNemar试验比较了不同模式的检出率。结果:208名男性(平均年龄62.9岁+/- 8.2岁)被纳入前瞻性研究。67.8%的患者肠道评分呈阳性,81.7%的患者PIRADS≥3。GUT联合mpMRI诊断的敏感性(99.1%)显著高于GUT和mpMRI单独诊断,分别为84.4%和93.8% (p≤0.05)。同样,mpMRI与PCPTCR2相结合获得了非常高的灵敏度(99.0%)。然而,mpMRI + GUT联合治疗比mpMRI + PCPTCR2治疗节省更多的不必要活检,分别为25%和2.4%。结论:GUT和mpMRI相结合可以节省大量不必要的活检,并将遗漏csPCa病例的风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review Correction to: Pictorial review of multiparametric MRI in bladder urothelial carcinoma with variant histology: pearls and pitfalls. Toward eliminating missed important findings in fibrostenosing Crohn’s disease at CT and MR enterography Non-Gaussian diffusion MRI models for preoperative assessment of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1