Impact of mechanical ventilation on severe acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with and without COVID-19 - a multicentre propensity matched analysis.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1186/s13613-025-01424-4
Fabian Perschinka, Timo Mayerhöfer, Teresa Engelbrecht, Alexandra Graf, Paul Zajic, Philipp Metnitz, Michael Joannidis
{"title":"Impact of mechanical ventilation on severe acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with and without COVID-19 - a multicentre propensity matched analysis.","authors":"Fabian Perschinka, Timo Mayerhöfer, Teresa Engelbrecht, Alexandra Graf, Paul Zajic, Philipp Metnitz, Michael Joannidis","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01424-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critically ill patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Its complications often require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and infections are considered risk factors for the occurrence of AKI. The use of IMV and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has changed over the course of the pandemic. Concomitant with this change in treatment a reduction in the incidences of AKI and RRT was observed. We aimed to investigate the impact of IMV on RRT initiation by comparing critically ill patients with and without COVID-19. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate the rates and timing of RRT as well as the outcome of patients, who were treated with RRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8,678 patients were included, of which 555 (12.8%) in the COVID-19 and 554 (12.8%) in the control group were treated with RRT. In the first week of ICU stay the COVID-19 patients showed a significantly lower probability for RRT initiation (day 1: p < 0.0001, day 2: p = 0.021). However, after day 7 a reversed HR was found. In mechanically ventilated patients the risk was significantly higher for the initiation of RRT over the entire stay. While in non-COVID-19 patients this was a non-significant trend, in COVID-19 patients the risk for RRT was significantly increased. The median delay between initiation of IMV and requirement of RRT was observed to be longer in COVID-19 patients (5 days [IQR: 2-11] vs. 2 days [IQR: 1-5]). The analysis restricted to patients with RRT showed a significantly higher risk for ICU death in patients requiring IMV compared to patients without IMV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis demonstrated that IMV as well as COVID-19 are associated with an increased risk for initiation of RRT. The association between IMV and risk of RRT initiation was given for all investigated time intervals. Additionally, COVID-19 patients showed an increased risk for RRT initiation during the entire ICU stay within patients admitted to an ICU due to respiratory disease. In COVID-19 patients treated with RRT, the risk of death was significantly higher compared to non-COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01424-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critically ill patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Its complications often require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and infections are considered risk factors for the occurrence of AKI. The use of IMV and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has changed over the course of the pandemic. Concomitant with this change in treatment a reduction in the incidences of AKI and RRT was observed. We aimed to investigate the impact of IMV on RRT initiation by comparing critically ill patients with and without COVID-19. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate the rates and timing of RRT as well as the outcome of patients, who were treated with RRT.

Results: A total of 8,678 patients were included, of which 555 (12.8%) in the COVID-19 and 554 (12.8%) in the control group were treated with RRT. In the first week of ICU stay the COVID-19 patients showed a significantly lower probability for RRT initiation (day 1: p < 0.0001, day 2: p = 0.021). However, after day 7 a reversed HR was found. In mechanically ventilated patients the risk was significantly higher for the initiation of RRT over the entire stay. While in non-COVID-19 patients this was a non-significant trend, in COVID-19 patients the risk for RRT was significantly increased. The median delay between initiation of IMV and requirement of RRT was observed to be longer in COVID-19 patients (5 days [IQR: 2-11] vs. 2 days [IQR: 1-5]). The analysis restricted to patients with RRT showed a significantly higher risk for ICU death in patients requiring IMV compared to patients without IMV.

Conclusion: The analysis demonstrated that IMV as well as COVID-19 are associated with an increased risk for initiation of RRT. The association between IMV and risk of RRT initiation was given for all investigated time intervals. Additionally, COVID-19 patients showed an increased risk for RRT initiation during the entire ICU stay within patients admitted to an ICU due to respiratory disease. In COVID-19 patients treated with RRT, the risk of death was significantly higher compared to non-COVID-19 patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械通气对合并和不合并COVID-19的危重患者严重急性肾损伤的影响——多中心倾向匹配分析
背景:急性肾损伤(AKI)在危重患者中很常见,并与发病率和死亡率增加有关。其并发症通常需要肾脏替代治疗(RRT)。有创机械通气(IMV)和感染被认为是AKI发生的危险因素。在大流行期间,IMV和无创通气(NIV)的使用发生了变化。伴随这种治疗变化的是AKI和RRT发生率的降低。我们的目的是通过比较合并和未合并COVID-19的危重患者来研究IMV对RRT启动的影响。此外,我们想调查RRT的发生率和时间以及接受RRT治疗的患者的结果。结果:共纳入8678例患者,其中新冠肺炎患者555例(12.8%),对照组554例(12.8%)接受RRT治疗。在ICU住院的第一周,COVID-19患者开始RRT的可能性显著降低(第1天:p)。结论:分析表明,IMV和COVID-19与开始RRT的风险增加有关。所有被调查的时间间隔都给出了IMV与RRT启动风险之间的关联。此外,在因呼吸道疾病入住ICU的患者的整个ICU住院期间,COVID-19患者出现RRT启动的风险增加。在接受RRT治疗的COVID-19患者中,死亡风险明显高于非COVID-19患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
期刊最新文献
"It changed the atmosphere, but how long will it last?": healthcare professionals' experiences of an intervention to improve positive communication in intensive care. Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of the association of serial leukocyte counts in critically ill patients and mortality. The International, Prospective COSMOS (CytOSorb® TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS) Registry: Interim Results in Patients with Septic Shock. Relation between initial hypothermia, course of the hypothermia and mortality in patients with septic shock: a post-hoc analysis of the SEPSISPAM randomized trial. Determinants of time to decannulation and predictors of early weaning from tracheostomy: a multicenter, retrospective Italian cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1