Time Until Operation for Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Canadian Vascular Centers Using the Canadian Vascular Quality Initiative Registry

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2025.01.014
Nadia O. Trabelsi , Laura M. Drudi , Hassan Bachir Melhem , Cristian Rosu , Louis-Mathieu Stevens , Stéphane Elkouri
{"title":"Time Until Operation for Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Canadian Vascular Centers Using the Canadian Vascular Quality Initiative Registry","authors":"Nadia O. Trabelsi ,&nbsp;Laura M. Drudi ,&nbsp;Hassan Bachir Melhem ,&nbsp;Cristian Rosu ,&nbsp;Louis-Mathieu Stevens ,&nbsp;Stéphane Elkouri","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Optimal timing for intervention for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remains unclear. Given the increased rupture risk with larger aneurysms, timely intervention is critical. This study sought to examine endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) delays across Canadian centers, focusing on potential differences related to geography, sex, and race.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Vascular Quality Initiative dataset was obtained for all patients who underwent elective EVAR for asymptomatic AAAsbetween January 11, 2016 and October 30<sup>,</sup> 2020 in six participating Canadian vascular centers. Delay was defined as the time between the date of preoperative imaging and the operative date. Univariate and multivariable analysis were performed to evaluate predictors of long delay.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 659 patients were included in the analysis. Geographic disparities were significant, with patients in Quebec more likely to experience delays exceeding 8 weeks compared to Ontario (odds ratio = 4.5, 95% confidence interval: 2.8–7.1, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Patients with shorter delays (≤8 weeks) were more likely to have an unrestricted functional status (88.0% vs. 81.9% for delay &gt;8 weeks, <em>P</em> = 0.030) and larger aneurysms (83.1% vs. 67.0% for delay &gt;8 weeks, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Perioperative and postoperative complications were similar across both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study reveals significant disparities in the timing of elective EVAR cross Canadian centers, likely due to multifactorial causes. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to reduce delays and ensure equitable access to timely care. Future efforts should focus on improving healthcare system preparedness and addressing regional and demographic disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 205-213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089050962500041X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Optimal timing for intervention for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remains unclear. Given the increased rupture risk with larger aneurysms, timely intervention is critical. This study sought to examine endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) delays across Canadian centers, focusing on potential differences related to geography, sex, and race.

Methods

The Vascular Quality Initiative dataset was obtained for all patients who underwent elective EVAR for asymptomatic AAAsbetween January 11, 2016 and October 30, 2020 in six participating Canadian vascular centers. Delay was defined as the time between the date of preoperative imaging and the operative date. Univariate and multivariable analysis were performed to evaluate predictors of long delay.

Results

A total of 659 patients were included in the analysis. Geographic disparities were significant, with patients in Quebec more likely to experience delays exceeding 8 weeks compared to Ontario (odds ratio = 4.5, 95% confidence interval: 2.8–7.1, P < 0.001). Patients with shorter delays (≤8 weeks) were more likely to have an unrestricted functional status (88.0% vs. 81.9% for delay >8 weeks, P = 0.030) and larger aneurysms (83.1% vs. 67.0% for delay >8 weeks, P < 0.001). Perioperative and postoperative complications were similar across both groups.

Conclusions

Our study reveals significant disparities in the timing of elective EVAR cross Canadian centers, likely due to multifactorial causes. These findings highlight the need for targeted strategies to reduce delays and ensure equitable access to timely care. Future efforts should focus on improving healthcare system preparedness and addressing regional and demographic disparities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据加拿大血管质量倡议登记,加拿大血管中心择期血管内动脉瘤修复手术前的时间。
目的:腹主动脉瘤的最佳干预时机尚不清楚。考虑到较大动脉瘤的破裂风险增加,及时干预是至关重要的。本研究旨在检查加拿大各中心的血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)延迟,重点关注与地理、性别和种族相关的潜在差异。方法:在2016年1月11日至2020年10月30日期间,在6个参与研究的加拿大血管中心,获得所有因无症状AAAs而接受选择性EVAR的患者的血管质量倡议(VQI)数据集。延迟定义为术前影像学检查到手术日期之间的时间。单变量和多变量分析评估了长延迟的预测因素。结果:共纳入659例患者。地理差异显著,与安大略省相比,魁北克省的患者更有可能经历超过8周的延迟(OR = 4.5, 95% CI: 2.8-7.1, p < 0.001)。延迟时间较短(≤8周)的患者更有可能具有不受限制的功能状态(延迟> 8周为88.0%比81.9%,p = 0.030)和较大的动脉瘤(延迟> 8周为83.1%比67.0%,p < 0.001)。两组围手术期和术后并发症相似。结论:我们的研究揭示了加拿大各中心选择性EVAR时间的显著差异,可能是由多因素原因引起的。这些发现突出表明,需要制定有针对性的战略,以减少延误并确保公平获得及时护理。未来的努力应侧重于改善卫生保健系统的准备工作,并解决区域和人口差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Distal Extent of Aortic Dissection Increases Risk of Malperfusion Syndromes and Need for Reoperation in Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Kinesiophobia and its Influencing Factors in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Large Retrospective Study in China Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Explantation for Failed Noninfected Aortic Endografts Blunt Traumatic Ruptures of the Aortic Isthmus: Favor Associated Lesions Rather than Rupture in Hemodynamically Unstable Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1