Validation of Analytical Performance and Diagnostic Effectiveness of Anti-CCP Antibody Based on the Light-Initiated Chemiluminescence Assay.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annals of clinical and laboratory science Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Shi-Zhen Guan, Hong-Jing Zhang, Shan-Shan Cheng, Yi Wang, Hong-Wei Yang, Hui-Qiang Li
{"title":"Validation of Analytical Performance and Diagnostic Effectiveness of Anti-CCP Antibody Based on the Light-Initiated Chemiluminescence Assay.","authors":"Shi-Zhen Guan, Hong-Jing Zhang, Shan-Shan Cheng, Yi Wang, Hong-Wei Yang, Hui-Qiang Li","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the analytical and diagnostic performance of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody measured by the light-initiated chemiluminescence assay (LICA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 193 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 211 controls were included. Serum anti-CCP levels were assessed by LICA and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELSIA). The analytical performance of LICA anti-CCP assay was evaluated according to the clinical guidelines. The diagnostic performance of LICA anti-CCP assay was evaluated by a series of indicators such as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) compared with ELISA. The dynamic consistency of the two methods was compared by patient follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LICA anti-CCP assay showed coefficient of variation of 0.6% - 3.3% and linearity within 10-500 U/mL with a correlation coefficient of 0.991. The LICA and ELISA showed similar sensitivity (88.60% vs 92.94%) and specificity (97.60% vs 94.95%) on determination of anti-CCP. The AUCs of anti-CCP detected by LICA and ELISA were 0.971 and 0.955 (<i>P</i>=0.052), respectively. Follow-up showed that the changes of anti-CCP measured by the two methods were consistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LICA anti-CCP assay has good analytical and diagnostic performance for RA, which is comparable to ELISA, and has dynamic consistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":8228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","volume":"54 6","pages":"860-866"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the analytical and diagnostic performance of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody measured by the light-initiated chemiluminescence assay (LICA).

Methods: A total of 193 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 211 controls were included. Serum anti-CCP levels were assessed by LICA and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELSIA). The analytical performance of LICA anti-CCP assay was evaluated according to the clinical guidelines. The diagnostic performance of LICA anti-CCP assay was evaluated by a series of indicators such as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) compared with ELISA. The dynamic consistency of the two methods was compared by patient follow-up.

Results: The LICA anti-CCP assay showed coefficient of variation of 0.6% - 3.3% and linearity within 10-500 U/mL with a correlation coefficient of 0.991. The LICA and ELISA showed similar sensitivity (88.60% vs 92.94%) and specificity (97.60% vs 94.95%) on determination of anti-CCP. The AUCs of anti-CCP detected by LICA and ELISA were 0.971 and 0.955 (P=0.052), respectively. Follow-up showed that the changes of anti-CCP measured by the two methods were consistent.

Conclusions: LICA anti-CCP assay has good analytical and diagnostic performance for RA, which is comparable to ELISA, and has dynamic consistency.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于光致化学发光法的抗ccp抗体分析性能及诊断有效性验证。
目的:评价光致化学发光法(LICA)检测抗环瓜氨酸肽(anti-CCP)抗体的分析和诊断性能。方法:纳入类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者193例,对照组211例。采用LICA和ELSIA检测血清抗ccp水平。根据临床指南评价LICA抗ccp法的分析性能。通过灵敏度、特异度、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)等一系列指标与ELISA比较,评价LICA抗ccp检测的诊断性能。通过患者随访比较两种方法的动态一致性。结果:LICA抗ccp检测变异系数为0.6% ~ 3.3%,在10 ~ 500 U/mL范围内呈线性关系,相关系数为0.991。LICA和ELISA检测抗ccp的灵敏度(88.60% vs 92.94%)和特异性(97.60% vs 94.95%)相似。LICA和ELISA检测抗ccp的auc分别为0.971和0.955 (P=0.052)。随访显示两种方法测得的抗ccp变化一致。结论:LICA抗ccp检测对RA具有良好的分析和诊断性能,与ELISA相当,且具有动态一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of clinical and laboratory science
Annals of clinical and laboratory science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science welcomes manuscripts that report research in clinical science, including pathology, clinical chemistry, biotechnology, molecular biology, cytogenetics, microbiology, immunology, hematology, transfusion medicine, organ and tissue transplantation, therapeutics, toxicology, and clinical informatics.
期刊最新文献
Review: Differentiating Various Renal Cell Tumors with Clear Cytoplasmic Features, Old and New, Based on Their Different Renal Tubular Origins. Human Monoclonal Antibody against hIL18 Receptor Accessory Protein Chain Promotes Anti-Tumor Activity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. A Case Report of HLA 5/10 Cord Blood Cell Engraftment in a Patient with Severe β Thalassemia after Haplo-Cord Stem Cell Transplantation. Letter to the Editor: Correlation of Blood CD8+CD60+ T Cells, CD4+CD25+, or CD1d+ Cells with Total Serum IgE Levels in Adults with Asthma. Clinical Implication of Alterations in Serum Klotho Levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Differential C-Peptide Patterns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1