Short (2-Hour) Non-Oxygenated End-Ischemic Hypothermic Perfusion Versus Cold Storage in the Setting of Renal Transplantation.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Artificial organs Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1111/aor.14953
Franco Ruberto, Quirino Lai, Mario Piazzolla, Luca Poli, Veronica Zullino, Giulia Diamantini, Matteo Brisciani, Francesco Giovanardi, Fabio Melandro, Silvia Quaresima, Massimo Rossi, Manuela Garofalo, Francesco Pugliese
{"title":"Short (2-Hour) Non-Oxygenated End-Ischemic Hypothermic Perfusion Versus Cold Storage in the Setting of Renal Transplantation.","authors":"Franco Ruberto, Quirino Lai, Mario Piazzolla, Luca Poli, Veronica Zullino, Giulia Diamantini, Matteo Brisciani, Francesco Giovanardi, Fabio Melandro, Silvia Quaresima, Massimo Rossi, Manuela Garofalo, Francesco Pugliese","doi":"10.1111/aor.14953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease. End-ischemic hypothermic machine perfusion (EI-HMP) has emerged as a promising method for preserving grafts before transplantation. This study aimed to compare graft function recovery in KT recipients of deceased brain-death (DBD) grafts preserved with EI-HMP versus static cold storage (SCS). The primary outcome was the rate of delayed graft function (DGF). Secondary outcomes included urine output, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay duration, and survival rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, single-center observational study was conducted at Sapienza University of Rome, analyzing 313 KT patients between January 2014 and September 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on graft preservation methods (EI-HMP, n = 95; SCS, n = 218). A stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method was employed to adjust for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in DGF rates between the two groups (17.9% vs. 15.6% in SCS and EI-HMP cases, respectively; p = 0.75). EI-HMP group demonstrated a higher urine output on day 2 (p = 0.046), a shorter ICU stay (p < 0.0001), and a trend toward a shorter overall hospital stay (p = 0.07). No statistically significant differences were found between EI-HMP and SCS cases in 1- and 3-year overall survival rates (3.2% and 6.7% vs. 5.6% and 6.6%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.53) or in death-censored graft loss rates (5.4% and 8.9% vs. 5.7% and 7.3%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.88). In a sub-analysis of expanded criteria donors (ECD), EI-HMP demonstrated a protective effect by reducing the risk of DGF (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.09-0.95; p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EI-HMP was associated with certain short-term benefits, including increased urine output and reduced ICU stays, but showed no significant impact on long-term survival outcomes. A reduction in DGF rates was observed only in the ECD subgroup. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to further investigate the long-term clinical benefits of EI-HMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease. End-ischemic hypothermic machine perfusion (EI-HMP) has emerged as a promising method for preserving grafts before transplantation. This study aimed to compare graft function recovery in KT recipients of deceased brain-death (DBD) grafts preserved with EI-HMP versus static cold storage (SCS). The primary outcome was the rate of delayed graft function (DGF). Secondary outcomes included urine output, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay duration, and survival rates.

Methods: A retrospective, single-center observational study was conducted at Sapienza University of Rome, analyzing 313 KT patients between January 2014 and September 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on graft preservation methods (EI-HMP, n = 95; SCS, n = 218). A stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method was employed to adjust for potential confounders.

Results: There were no significant differences in DGF rates between the two groups (17.9% vs. 15.6% in SCS and EI-HMP cases, respectively; p = 0.75). EI-HMP group demonstrated a higher urine output on day 2 (p = 0.046), a shorter ICU stay (p < 0.0001), and a trend toward a shorter overall hospital stay (p = 0.07). No statistically significant differences were found between EI-HMP and SCS cases in 1- and 3-year overall survival rates (3.2% and 6.7% vs. 5.6% and 6.6%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.53) or in death-censored graft loss rates (5.4% and 8.9% vs. 5.7% and 7.3%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.88). In a sub-analysis of expanded criteria donors (ECD), EI-HMP demonstrated a protective effect by reducing the risk of DGF (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.09-0.95; p = 0.047).

Conclusion: EI-HMP was associated with certain short-term benefits, including increased urine output and reduced ICU stays, but showed no significant impact on long-term survival outcomes. A reduction in DGF rates was observed only in the ECD subgroup. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to further investigate the long-term clinical benefits of EI-HMP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:肾移植(KT)是治疗终末期肾病最有效的方法。缺血末期低温机器灌注(EI-HMP)已成为移植前保存移植物的一种有前途的方法。本研究旨在比较使用 EI-HMP 和静态冷藏(SCS)保存的脑死亡(DBD)移植物的 KT 受体的移植物功能恢复情况。主要结果是移植物功能延迟率(DGF)。次要结果包括尿量、重症监护室(ICU)停留时间、住院时间和存活率:罗马萨皮恩扎大学开展了一项回顾性单中心观察研究,分析了 2014 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月间的 313 名 KT 患者。根据移植物保存方法将患者分为两组(EI-HMP,n = 95;SCS,n = 218)。采用稳定逆概率治疗加权法(IPTW)调整潜在的混杂因素:两组的 DGF 发生率无明显差异(SCS 和 EI-HMP 病例的 DGF 发生率分别为 17.9% 和 15.6%;P = 0.75)。EI-HMP 组第 2 天的尿量较高(p = 0.046),重症监护室的住院时间较短(p 结论:EI-HMP 组的尿量较高,但住院时间较短:EI-HMP 有一定的短期疗效,包括增加尿量和缩短重症监护室住院时间,但对长期生存结果没有显著影响。仅在 ECD 亚组中观察到 DGF 发生率降低。有必要进行随机对照试验,以进一步研究 EI-HMP 的长期临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
期刊最新文献
Reoperative Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion Following Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Less Invasive Versus Sternotomy Approach. Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients Supported by Left Ventricular Assist Device. Association of Left Ventricular Size on Outcomes in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Comparison of Open Albumin Dialysis (OPAL) With Prometheus Fractionated Plasma Separation and Adsorption (FPSA) and Standard Medical Treatment for Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1