Liver Elastography for Liver Fibrosis Stratification: A Comparison of Three Techniques in a Biopsy-Controlled MASLD Cohort.

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Biomedicines Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.3390/biomedicines13010138
Antonio Liguori, Giorgio Esposto, Maria Elena Ainora, Irene Mignini, Raffaele Borriello, Linda Galasso, Mattia Paratore, Maria Cristina Giustiniani, Laura Riccardi, Matteo Garcovich, Antonio Gasbarrini, Luca Miele, Maria Assunta Zocco
{"title":"Liver Elastography for Liver Fibrosis Stratification: A Comparison of Three Techniques in a Biopsy-Controlled MASLD Cohort.","authors":"Antonio Liguori, Giorgio Esposto, Maria Elena Ainora, Irene Mignini, Raffaele Borriello, Linda Galasso, Mattia Paratore, Maria Cristina Giustiniani, Laura Riccardi, Matteo Garcovich, Antonio Gasbarrini, Luca Miele, Maria Assunta Zocco","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines13010138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy in fibrosis staging of a novel shear wave elastography (SWE) device (S-Shearwave Imaging by Samsung) and a previously validated 2D-SWE by Supersonic Imagine (SSI) in patients with biopsy proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). <b>Methods:</b> This prospective study included 75 consecutive patients with MASLD who underwent liver biopsy for suspected MASH. All patients underwent S-Shearwave Imaging by Samsung and 2D-SWE with SSI on the same day of liver biopsy. Fibrosis was histologically assessed using the METAVIR classification system. Agreement between the equipment was assessed with the Pearson coefficient. A receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis with the Youden index was used to establish thresholds for fibrosis staging. <b>Results:</b> A good correlation was found between S-Shearwave Imaging by Samsung and 2D-SWE with SSI (Pearson's R = 0.68; <i>p</i> < 0.01). At multivariate regression analysis, S-Shearwave Imaging was associated with advanced fibrosis (≥F3) independently from age, diabetes and platelets (OR 2.94, CI 1.69-5.11, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The fibrosis diagnostic accuracy of both S-Shearwave Imaging and 2D-SWE was good to optimal with AUROCs of 0.81 and 0.70 for significant fibrosis (≥F2), 0.94 and 0.91 for severe fibrosis (≥F3), respectively. The accuracy of S-Shearwave is not significantly different from Fibroscan and Agile3+ (DeLong test <i>p</i> value 0.16 and 0.15, respectively) while is slightly better than 2D-SWE, FIB4 and NFS (DeLong test <i>p</i> value < 0.05). For S-Shearwave Imaging by Samsung, the best cut-off values for diagnosing fibrosis ≥F2, ≥F3 were, respectively, 7.9 kPa (Sens 74.4%, Spec 87.5%) and 8.1 kPa (Sens 95.6%, Spec 78.8%). For 2D-SWE by SSI, the best cut-off values for diagnosing fibrosis ≥F2, ≥F3 were, respectively, 7.2 kPa (Sens 55.8%, Spec 84.4%) and 7.6 kPa (Sens 82.6%, Spec 84.6%). <b>Conclusion:</b> S-Shearwave Imaging is a useful and reliable non-invasive technique for staging liver fibrosis in patients with MASLD. Its diagnostic accuracy is non-inferior to other shear wave elastography techniques (TE and 2D-SWE by SSI).</p>","PeriodicalId":8937,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicines","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13010138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy in fibrosis staging of a novel shear wave elastography (SWE) device (S-Shearwave Imaging by Samsung) and a previously validated 2D-SWE by Supersonic Imagine (SSI) in patients with biopsy proven metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods: This prospective study included 75 consecutive patients with MASLD who underwent liver biopsy for suspected MASH. All patients underwent S-Shearwave Imaging by Samsung and 2D-SWE with SSI on the same day of liver biopsy. Fibrosis was histologically assessed using the METAVIR classification system. Agreement between the equipment was assessed with the Pearson coefficient. A receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis with the Youden index was used to establish thresholds for fibrosis staging. Results: A good correlation was found between S-Shearwave Imaging by Samsung and 2D-SWE with SSI (Pearson's R = 0.68; p < 0.01). At multivariate regression analysis, S-Shearwave Imaging was associated with advanced fibrosis (≥F3) independently from age, diabetes and platelets (OR 2.94, CI 1.69-5.11, p < 0.01). The fibrosis diagnostic accuracy of both S-Shearwave Imaging and 2D-SWE was good to optimal with AUROCs of 0.81 and 0.70 for significant fibrosis (≥F2), 0.94 and 0.91 for severe fibrosis (≥F3), respectively. The accuracy of S-Shearwave is not significantly different from Fibroscan and Agile3+ (DeLong test p value 0.16 and 0.15, respectively) while is slightly better than 2D-SWE, FIB4 and NFS (DeLong test p value < 0.05). For S-Shearwave Imaging by Samsung, the best cut-off values for diagnosing fibrosis ≥F2, ≥F3 were, respectively, 7.9 kPa (Sens 74.4%, Spec 87.5%) and 8.1 kPa (Sens 95.6%, Spec 78.8%). For 2D-SWE by SSI, the best cut-off values for diagnosing fibrosis ≥F2, ≥F3 were, respectively, 7.2 kPa (Sens 55.8%, Spec 84.4%) and 7.6 kPa (Sens 82.6%, Spec 84.6%). Conclusion: S-Shearwave Imaging is a useful and reliable non-invasive technique for staging liver fibrosis in patients with MASLD. Its diagnostic accuracy is non-inferior to other shear wave elastography techniques (TE and 2D-SWE by SSI).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝弹性成像用于肝纤维化分层:三种技术在活检控制的MASLD队列中的比较。
背景:本研究的目的是研究一种新型剪切波弹性成像(SWE)设备(三星的S-Shearwave Imaging)和一种先前由超声想象(SSI)验证的2D-SWE在活检证实为代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)患者中的纤维化分期的准确性。方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了75例连续的MASLD患者,他们接受了肝活检,怀疑是MASH。所有患者在肝活检当天均行三星S-Shearwave成像和2D-SWE合并SSI。使用METAVIR分级系统对纤维化进行组织学评估。用皮尔逊系数评估设备之间的一致性。采用约登指数的受试者操作者特征曲线(ROC)分析来确定纤维化分期的阈值。结果:Samsung S-Shearwave Imaging与2D-SWE与SSI具有良好的相关性(Pearson’s R = 0.68;P < 0.01)。在多因素回归分析中,S-Shearwave成像与晚期纤维化(≥F3)相关,与年龄、糖尿病和血小板无关(OR 2.94, CI 1.69-5.11, p < 0.01)。S-Shearwave Imaging和2D-SWE对纤维化的诊断准确性均为良好至最佳,对于显著纤维化(≥F2)的auroc分别为0.81和0.70,对于严重纤维化(≥F3)的auroc分别为0.94和0.91。S-Shearwave的准确性与Fibroscan和Agile3+相比差异无统计学意义(DeLong检验p值分别为0.16和0.15),略优于2D-SWE、FIB4和NFS (DeLong检验p值< 0.05)。三星S-Shearwave Imaging诊断纤维化≥F2、≥F3的最佳临界值分别为7.9 kPa (Sens 74.4%, Spec 87.5%)和8.1 kPa (Sens 95.6%, Spec 78.8%)。SSI对2D-SWE诊断纤维化≥F2、≥F3的最佳临界值分别为7.2 kPa (Sens 55.8%, Spec 84.4%)和7.6 kPa (Sens 82.6%, Spec 84.6%)。结论:S-Shearwave成像是一种有效、可靠的无创诊断MASLD肝纤维化分期的技术。其诊断准确性不低于其他横波弹性成像技术(TE和SSI的2D-SWE)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedicines
Biomedicines Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2823
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059; CODEN: BIOMID) is an international, scientific, open access journal on biomedicines published quarterly online by MDPI.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Rehman et al. Nicotinamide Ameliorates Amyloid Beta-Induced Oxidative Stress-Mediated Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration in Adult Mouse Brain. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 408. Identification and Functional Validation of PTH2R as a Therapeutic Target in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Identification and Validation of Signature Genes in Invasiveness-Associated Modules of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas. New Advances in Cardiovascular Drugs: In Memory of Professor Akira Endo. Heart Failure in the Molecular Era: Redefining Our Understanding of Disease Mechanisms and Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1