Frequency and types of antibiotic usage in a referral neonatal intensive care unit, based on the world health organization classification (AwaRe).

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMC Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1186/s12887-025-05407-z
Farzaneh Hematian, Seyyed Mohammad Hassan Aletayeb, Masoud Dehdashtian, Mohammad Reza Aramesh, Arash Malakian, Mahboobeh Sadat Aletayeb
{"title":"Frequency and types of antibiotic usage in a referral neonatal intensive care unit, based on the world health organization classification (AwaRe).","authors":"Farzaneh Hematian, Seyyed Mohammad Hassan Aletayeb, Masoud Dehdashtian, Mohammad Reza Aramesh, Arash Malakian, Mahboobeh Sadat Aletayeb","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-05407-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive prescription of antibiotics in infants increases the risk of short-term and lifelong morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, the use of antibiotics in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is significantly high. This is primarily because neonatologists are concerned about the fragile immune systems of newborns, their vulnerability to serious infectious diseases, and the challenge of accurately distinguishing between infectious and non-infectious conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A five-month cross-sectional prospective study was conducted in southwestern Iran's largest neonatal intensive care unit. This study aimed to evaluate the dose and duration of antibiotic therapy and identify the prescribing pattern of antibiotics based on the Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 502 examined patient files, antibiotics were prescribed for 483 neonates. The most common drug combinations were ampicillin and amikacin. The mean number and duration of antibiotic administration were 2.14 drugs and 7.78 days, respectively. 84.3% of infants received antibiotics for ten days or less. The mean course of antibiotic prescription for newborns was 1.1, and 83.1% of prescribed antibiotics were from the Access Group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The antibiotic prescription rate was high in our study's department. Most neonates received two antibiotics in one course from the Access group.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05407-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excessive prescription of antibiotics in infants increases the risk of short-term and lifelong morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, the use of antibiotics in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is significantly high. This is primarily because neonatologists are concerned about the fragile immune systems of newborns, their vulnerability to serious infectious diseases, and the challenge of accurately distinguishing between infectious and non-infectious conditions.

Method: A five-month cross-sectional prospective study was conducted in southwestern Iran's largest neonatal intensive care unit. This study aimed to evaluate the dose and duration of antibiotic therapy and identify the prescribing pattern of antibiotics based on the Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Results: Out of 502 examined patient files, antibiotics were prescribed for 483 neonates. The most common drug combinations were ampicillin and amikacin. The mean number and duration of antibiotic administration were 2.14 drugs and 7.78 days, respectively. 84.3% of infants received antibiotics for ten days or less. The mean course of antibiotic prescription for newborns was 1.1, and 83.1% of prescribed antibiotics were from the Access Group.

Conclusion: The antibiotic prescription rate was high in our study's department. Most neonates received two antibiotics in one course from the Access group.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据世界卫生组织分类(AwaRe),转诊新生儿重症监护病房抗生素使用频率和类型。
背景:婴儿过度使用抗生素会增加短期和终身发病率和死亡率的风险。尽管如此,抗生素在新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)的使用率仍然很高。这主要是因为新生儿科医生担心新生儿脆弱的免疫系统,他们对严重传染病的脆弱性,以及准确区分传染性和非传染性疾病的挑战。方法:在伊朗西南部最大的新生儿重症监护病房进行了为期五个月的横断面前瞻性研究。本研究旨在评估抗生素治疗的剂量和持续时间,并根据世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的准入、观察和储备(AWaRe)分类确定抗生素的处方模式。结果:在502例检查的患者档案中,483例新生儿开了抗生素。最常见的药物组合是氨苄西林和阿米卡星。平均抗生素使用次数和持续时间分别为2.14个药物和7.78天。84.3%的婴儿使用抗生素的时间不超过10天。新生儿抗生素处方的平均疗程为1.1个,处方抗生素的83.1%来自准入组。结论:本科室抗生素处方率较高。大多数新生儿在一个疗程中接受了两种抗生素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Predictive value of FeNO, eosinophils, and IgE for airway hyperresponsiveness in children with chronic cough: a cross-sectional study. Clinical study on improving lung function in children after Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MMP) via traditional Chinese medicine meridian massage. Psychosocial determinants of hand hygiene practices among children and adolescents living with HIV in the Northern city of Malawi. Outcomes and complications of invasive versus non-invasive respiratory support in extremely preterm infants: a retrospective study. Tetanus infection in an 11-year-old male with full infant vaccination history: a rare case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1