Anesthesia depth monitoring during opioid free anesthesia - a prospective observational study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02859-1
Krister Mogianos, Anna Km Persson
{"title":"Anesthesia depth monitoring during opioid free anesthesia - a prospective observational study.","authors":"Krister Mogianos, Anna Km Persson","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02859-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing general anesthesia are more frequently monitored for depth of anesthesia using processed electroencephalography. Opioid-free anesthesia is nowadays an accepted modality for general anesthesia, however it is unclear how to interpret data from processed electroencephalography when using a mixture of non-opioid anesthetic drugs. Our objective was to describe density spectral array patterns and compare processed encephalographic data indices between opioid-free and routine opioid based anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study was conducted on 30 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in a non-tertiary regional hospital. The patients underwent general anesthesia with three different methods and were monitored for anesthesia depth using processed encephalography and density spectral array. Primary outcome is a group-derived mean difference in patient state index and spectral edge frequency. As a secondary outcome a descriptive comparison of the spectral power, derived from the density spectral array, was done between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The opioid-free anesthesia group had significantly higher patient state index and spectral edge frequency compared to routine anesthesia. Density spectral array patterns were also different, most notably lacking the high power in alpha frequency spectrum seen in the other routine anesthesia methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Processed electroencephalography monitoring can be used in opioid-free anesthesia, however clinicians should expect higher values in monitoring indices. The density spectral array pattern using a common protocol for opioid-free anesthesia, with mainly sevoflurane combined with low doses of dexmedetomidine and esketamine, differs from well described opioid and GABA-ergic anesthesia methods. These findings should be further validated using other protocols for opioid-free anesthesia in order to safely monitor anesthesia depth.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT06227143, registration date; 26th of January 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02859-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing general anesthesia are more frequently monitored for depth of anesthesia using processed electroencephalography. Opioid-free anesthesia is nowadays an accepted modality for general anesthesia, however it is unclear how to interpret data from processed electroencephalography when using a mixture of non-opioid anesthetic drugs. Our objective was to describe density spectral array patterns and compare processed encephalographic data indices between opioid-free and routine opioid based anesthesia.

Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted on 30 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in a non-tertiary regional hospital. The patients underwent general anesthesia with three different methods and were monitored for anesthesia depth using processed encephalography and density spectral array. Primary outcome is a group-derived mean difference in patient state index and spectral edge frequency. As a secondary outcome a descriptive comparison of the spectral power, derived from the density spectral array, was done between groups.

Results: The opioid-free anesthesia group had significantly higher patient state index and spectral edge frequency compared to routine anesthesia. Density spectral array patterns were also different, most notably lacking the high power in alpha frequency spectrum seen in the other routine anesthesia methods.

Conclusions: Processed electroencephalography monitoring can be used in opioid-free anesthesia, however clinicians should expect higher values in monitoring indices. The density spectral array pattern using a common protocol for opioid-free anesthesia, with mainly sevoflurane combined with low doses of dexmedetomidine and esketamine, differs from well described opioid and GABA-ergic anesthesia methods. These findings should be further validated using other protocols for opioid-free anesthesia in order to safely monitor anesthesia depth.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT06227143, registration date; 26th of January 2024.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无阿片类药物麻醉期间麻醉深度监测-一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:全麻患者更常使用处理脑电图监测麻醉深度。目前,无阿片类药物麻醉是一种公认的全身麻醉方式,然而,当使用非阿片类麻醉药物的混合物时,如何解释处理后的脑电图数据尚不清楚。我们的目的是描述密度谱阵列模式,并比较无阿片类药物和常规阿片类药物麻醉之间的处理脑电图数据指数。方法:对30例在非三级地区医院行腹腔镜手术的成年患者进行前瞻性观察队列研究。采用三种不同的方法进行全身麻醉,并利用脑处理图和密度谱阵列监测麻醉深度。主要终点是患者状态指数和频谱边缘频率的组平均差异。作为次要结果的光谱功率的描述性比较,来自密度光谱阵列,在组之间完成。结果:无阿片类药物麻醉组患者状态指数和谱边频率明显高于常规麻醉组。密度谱阵列模式也不同,最明显的是缺乏其他常规麻醉方法所见的高功率α频谱。结论:处理脑电图监测可用于无阿片类药物麻醉,但临床医生应期望监测指标更高。使用无阿片类药物麻醉的常见方案的密度谱阵列模式,主要是七氟醚联合低剂量右美托咪定和艾氯胺酮,不同于已有的阿片类药物和gaba能麻醉方法。为了安全监测麻醉深度,这些发现应该在其他无阿片类药物麻醉方案中得到进一步验证。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov注册号NCT06227143,注册日期;2024年1月26日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Respiratory effects of rectus sheath block in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Benefits of nitric oxide administration during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative outcomes in adult patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Quadratus lumborum block versus femoral nerve block in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Compatibility and stability of ciprofol with different concentrations of remifentanil or esketamine. Postoperative pulmonary complications and response to recruitment maneuvers during hypoxemia in one lung ventilation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1