Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers Treated with Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancers Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.3390/cancers17020305
Farshid Dayyani, Heide A Stirnadel-Farrant, Jenny Hu, Yian Lin, Nehemiah Kebede, Stephen J Valerio, Daniel H Ahn
{"title":"Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers Treated with Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Farshid Dayyani, Heide A Stirnadel-Farrant, Jenny Hu, Yian Lin, Nehemiah Kebede, Stephen J Valerio, Daniel H Ahn","doi":"10.3390/cancers17020305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Historically, the standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancers (aBTCs) was gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis). Immunotherapy plus GemCis is now recommended as a first-line treatment for aBTCs. Whether patients can tolerate eight cycles of GemCis in clinical practice, as per the Advanced Biliary Cancer (ABC)-02 study, remains to be assessed. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study to assess real-world treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients with de novo or recurrent aBTCs treated with first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in the United States. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational cohort study used Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data (Market Clarity). Adults diagnosed with de novo or recurrent aBTCs in the United States who began first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy from January 2016-March 2022 were identified and followed from index until death, the end of continuous enrolment, or the end of study period. Treatment patterns and OS were assessed. <b>Results:</b> Overall, 559 patients were included (de novo, <i>n</i> = 462; recurrent, <i>n</i> = 97). GemCis was the most common first-line therapy received (de novo: 73.8%; recurrent: 57.7%). Most patients received approximately five cycles of GemCis; median (95% CI) time to discontinuation was 4.6 (4.3-5.1) months. Most patients died over the follow-up period (de novo: 70.3%; recurrent: 62.9%). Median OS (95% CI) was 14.2 (12.1-16.1) months (de novo) and 18.5 (15.6-26.9) months (recurrent). <b>Conclusions:</b> GemCis was the most common first-line therapy received during the study period; most patients were unable to receive eight cycles of GemCis. Survival was limited over the follow-up period, highlighting the need for new treatments for aBTCs. Future studies are warranted to understand the real-world impact of first-line immunotherapy plus GemCis for patients with aBTCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Historically, the standard of care for advanced biliary tract cancers (aBTCs) was gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis). Immunotherapy plus GemCis is now recommended as a first-line treatment for aBTCs. Whether patients can tolerate eight cycles of GemCis in clinical practice, as per the Advanced Biliary Cancer (ABC)-02 study, remains to be assessed. We performed a retrospective observational cohort study to assess real-world treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients with de novo or recurrent aBTCs treated with first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in the United States. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study used Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data (Market Clarity). Adults diagnosed with de novo or recurrent aBTCs in the United States who began first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy from January 2016-March 2022 were identified and followed from index until death, the end of continuous enrolment, or the end of study period. Treatment patterns and OS were assessed. Results: Overall, 559 patients were included (de novo, n = 462; recurrent, n = 97). GemCis was the most common first-line therapy received (de novo: 73.8%; recurrent: 57.7%). Most patients received approximately five cycles of GemCis; median (95% CI) time to discontinuation was 4.6 (4.3-5.1) months. Most patients died over the follow-up period (de novo: 70.3%; recurrent: 62.9%). Median OS (95% CI) was 14.2 (12.1-16.1) months (de novo) and 18.5 (15.6-26.9) months (recurrent). Conclusions: GemCis was the most common first-line therapy received during the study period; most patients were unable to receive eight cycles of GemCis. Survival was limited over the follow-up period, highlighting the need for new treatments for aBTCs. Future studies are warranted to understand the real-world impact of first-line immunotherapy plus GemCis for patients with aBTCs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期胆道肿瘤患者接受吉西他滨化疗的治疗模式和结果:一项回顾性研究。
背景:历史上,晚期胆道癌(abtc)的标准治疗是吉西他滨加顺铂(GemCis)。免疫疗法加GemCis现在被推荐作为abtc的一线治疗。根据晚期胆道癌(ABC)-02研究,患者在临床实践中是否能耐受8个周期的GemCis仍有待评估。我们进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究,以评估在美国接受一线吉西他滨化疗的新发或复发abtc患者的现实世界治疗模式和总生存期(OS)。方法:本回顾性观察队列研究使用Optum的去识别市场清晰度数据(Market Clarity)。在美国,从2016年1月至2022年3月开始一线吉西他滨化疗的被诊断为新生或复发性abtc的成年人被确定并随访,从开始到死亡、连续入组结束或研究期结束。评估治疗方式和OS。结果:共纳入559例患者(新生患者,n = 462;复发性,n = 97)。GemCis是最常见的一线治疗(de novo: 73.8%;复发性:57.7%)。大多数患者接受了大约5个周期的GemCis;到停药的中位(95% CI)时间为4.6(4.3-5.1)个月。大多数患者在随访期间死亡(de novo: 70.3%;复发性:62.9%)。中位OS (95% CI)为14.2(12.1-16.1)个月(新发)和18.5(15.6-26.9)个月(复发)。结论:GemCis是研究期间最常见的一线治疗方案;大多数患者无法接受8个周期的GemCis。在随访期间,生存期有限,强调需要对abtc进行新的治疗。未来的研究有必要了解一线免疫治疗加GemCis对abtc患者的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Targeting of miR-21 Restores SASH1 and Sensitizes HBV-HCC to Sorafenib. A Real-World, Single-Center, Observational Retrospective Experience of Durvalumab Treatment After Concomitant Chemoradiation for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. A Scoping Review on Fluorescence-Guided Surgery in Paediatric Renal Tumours: Current Perspectives and Future Plans. Correction: Ahn et al. Innovative qPCR Algorithm Using Platelet-Derived RNA for High-Specificity and Cost-Effective Ovarian Cancer Detection. Cancers 2025, 17, 1251. Integrating Targeted Therapies into AML Frontline Therapy: Who Gets What and What Does the Future Hold?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1