European surgical societies rarely have recommendations for the treatment of appendicitis - a survey.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02704-7
Siri Rønholdt Henriksen, Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes
{"title":"European surgical societies rarely have recommendations for the treatment of appendicitis - a survey.","authors":"Siri Rønholdt Henriksen, Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02704-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Guidelines for management and treatment of appendicitis recommends the removal of a normal-looking appendix, but the recommendations are deemed as weak because they are based on low quality evidence. We aimed to provide an overview of the recommendations from the European societies or associations of surgeons regarding the treatment of acute appendicitis and especially recommendations for the macroscopically normal-looking appendix.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>European surgical societies were contacted and sent an electronic questionnaire. Questions concerned if the association had a national guideline or recommended an existing one, and if they recommended a specific approach for the management of the normal-looking appendix, including who decided to remove the appendix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We contacted surgical societies from 28 European countries, and 17 surgical societies (61%) responded. Two societies had a national guideline for the treatment of appendicitis and one of these addressed how to treat the normal-looking appendix. Most societies (59%) answered that the operating surgeon decided whether to remove the normal-looking appendix. Eleven societies recommended using an existing guideline (65%), four societies (24%) did not recommend a guideline, and two societies did not know.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only two surgical societies had a published national recommendation or guideline on the treatment of suspected appendicitis, only one had a guideline for the management of the normal-looking appendix, and most societies answered that the operating surgeon decided.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02704-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Guidelines for management and treatment of appendicitis recommends the removal of a normal-looking appendix, but the recommendations are deemed as weak because they are based on low quality evidence. We aimed to provide an overview of the recommendations from the European societies or associations of surgeons regarding the treatment of acute appendicitis and especially recommendations for the macroscopically normal-looking appendix.

Methods: European surgical societies were contacted and sent an electronic questionnaire. Questions concerned if the association had a national guideline or recommended an existing one, and if they recommended a specific approach for the management of the normal-looking appendix, including who decided to remove the appendix.

Results: We contacted surgical societies from 28 European countries, and 17 surgical societies (61%) responded. Two societies had a national guideline for the treatment of appendicitis and one of these addressed how to treat the normal-looking appendix. Most societies (59%) answered that the operating surgeon decided whether to remove the normal-looking appendix. Eleven societies recommended using an existing guideline (65%), four societies (24%) did not recommend a guideline, and two societies did not know.

Conclusion: Only two surgical societies had a published national recommendation or guideline on the treatment of suspected appendicitis, only one had a guideline for the management of the normal-looking appendix, and most societies answered that the operating surgeon decided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
[Molecular mechanisms of plant resistance to cadmium toxicity].
IF 0 应用生态学报Pub Date : 2006-06-01 DOI:
Zhenghao Xu, Guojun Shen, Changqing Zhu, Linjuan Xu, Yong He, Gusong Yu
Root excretion and plant tolerance to cadmium toxicity - a review
IF 2.4 3区 农林科学Plant, Soil and EnvironmentPub Date : 2018-02-10 DOI: 10.17221/2205-PSE
J. Dong, W. Mao, G. Zhang, Fei-bo Wu, Y. Cai
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Impact of trauma on society. Influence of hemolysis, lipemia and bilirubin on biobank sample quality- origin and interference in the use for extracellular vesicle (EV) and MiRNA analyses. Networking between hospitals. Prevention programs. The association between timing of CT and outcomes for severe trauma patients: analysis of a nationwide trauma registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1