European surgical societies rarely have recommendations for the treatment of appendicitis - a survey.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02704-7
Siri Rønholdt Henriksen, Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes
{"title":"European surgical societies rarely have recommendations for the treatment of appendicitis - a survey.","authors":"Siri Rønholdt Henriksen, Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02704-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Guidelines for management and treatment of appendicitis recommends the removal of a normal-looking appendix, but the recommendations are deemed as weak because they are based on low quality evidence. We aimed to provide an overview of the recommendations from the European societies or associations of surgeons regarding the treatment of acute appendicitis and especially recommendations for the macroscopically normal-looking appendix.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>European surgical societies were contacted and sent an electronic questionnaire. Questions concerned if the association had a national guideline or recommended an existing one, and if they recommended a specific approach for the management of the normal-looking appendix, including who decided to remove the appendix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We contacted surgical societies from 28 European countries, and 17 surgical societies (61%) responded. Two societies had a national guideline for the treatment of appendicitis and one of these addressed how to treat the normal-looking appendix. Most societies (59%) answered that the operating surgeon decided whether to remove the normal-looking appendix. Eleven societies recommended using an existing guideline (65%), four societies (24%) did not recommend a guideline, and two societies did not know.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only two surgical societies had a published national recommendation or guideline on the treatment of suspected appendicitis, only one had a guideline for the management of the normal-looking appendix, and most societies answered that the operating surgeon decided.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02704-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Guidelines for management and treatment of appendicitis recommends the removal of a normal-looking appendix, but the recommendations are deemed as weak because they are based on low quality evidence. We aimed to provide an overview of the recommendations from the European societies or associations of surgeons regarding the treatment of acute appendicitis and especially recommendations for the macroscopically normal-looking appendix.

Methods: European surgical societies were contacted and sent an electronic questionnaire. Questions concerned if the association had a national guideline or recommended an existing one, and if they recommended a specific approach for the management of the normal-looking appendix, including who decided to remove the appendix.

Results: We contacted surgical societies from 28 European countries, and 17 surgical societies (61%) responded. Two societies had a national guideline for the treatment of appendicitis and one of these addressed how to treat the normal-looking appendix. Most societies (59%) answered that the operating surgeon decided whether to remove the normal-looking appendix. Eleven societies recommended using an existing guideline (65%), four societies (24%) did not recommend a guideline, and two societies did not know.

Conclusion: Only two surgical societies had a published national recommendation or guideline on the treatment of suspected appendicitis, only one had a guideline for the management of the normal-looking appendix, and most societies answered that the operating surgeon decided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项调查显示,欧洲外科学会很少对阑尾炎的治疗提出建议。
目的:阑尾炎的管理和治疗指南建议切除外观正常的阑尾,但该建议被认为是薄弱的,因为它们是基于低质量的证据。我们的目的是概述欧洲外科医生协会关于急性阑尾炎治疗的建议,特别是对宏观上看起来正常的阑尾的建议。方法:联系欧洲外科学会并发送电子问卷。问题是该协会是否有一个全国性的指导方针,还是推荐了一个现有的指导方针,以及他们是否建议了一个具体的方法来管理看起来正常的阑尾,包括谁决定切除阑尾。结果:我们联系了来自28个欧洲国家的外科学会,17个外科学会(61%)回应。有两个学会制定了治疗阑尾炎的国家指南,其中一个是关于如何治疗看起来正常的阑尾。大多数社会(59%)回答是外科医生决定是否切除看起来正常的阑尾。11个协会建议使用现有指南(65%),4个协会(24%)不推荐指南,2个协会不知道。结论:只有两个外科学会发表了疑似阑尾炎治疗的国家推荐或指南,只有一个学会有外观正常的阑尾的处理指南,大多数学会回答手术医生决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between social deprivation index and pedestrian injuries in a suburban setting: Is that the only factor? Risk factors and long-term outcomes in anterior iliac and obturator hip dislocation. Noninvasive ventilation in chest trauma-related acute respiratory failure related to chest trauma: Efficacy and risk of pneumothorax. Scintigraphy for the diagnosis of primary unrecognised fractures in multiple trauma patients - a prospective, blinded, monocentric study. Evolving fracture management: the role of helical plating in orthopaedic trauma surgery - a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1