Continuous serratus anterior block for sternotomy analgesia after cardiac surgery: a single-centre feasibility study

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.042
Jonathan G. Bailey , Ayman Hendy , Victor Neira , Edgar Chedrawy , Vishal Uppal
{"title":"Continuous serratus anterior block for sternotomy analgesia after cardiac surgery: a single-centre feasibility study","authors":"Jonathan G. Bailey ,&nbsp;Ayman Hendy ,&nbsp;Victor Neira ,&nbsp;Edgar Chedrawy ,&nbsp;Vishal Uppal","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Moderate-to-severe pain is common after cardiac surgery, peaking during the first and second postoperative days. Several nerve blocks for sternotomy have been described; however, the optimal location for continuous catheters has not been established. This study assessed the feasibility of a larger trial evaluating the efficacy of serratus anterior plane (SAP) catheter analgesia for sternotomy pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This double-blinded trial included patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy. Bilateral SAP catheters were placed in all participants, and randomised to ropivacaine or placebo. We assessed feasibility based on predetermined endpoints: (1) average recruitment rate &gt;4 per month; (2) protocol adherence rate &gt;90%; (3) primary outcome measurement rate &gt;90%; and (4) significant catheter-related adverse event rate ≤2%. The quality of recovery index (QoR-15) was compared using an independent <em>t</em>-test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 52 participants randomised, feasibility data were available for 50. A definitive study was deemed ‘not feasible’ in our standalone centre owing to a low recruitment rate (2.4 per month) and a high adverse event rate (pneumothorax rate 12%). There were no major protocol deviations but minor deviations in 12% of participants. Pain, opioid consumption, complications, and quality of recovery were not different between groups. Long-term pain at 3 months was low in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A single-centre trial was deemed not feasible for our setting. With limited data, the quality of recovery was not different with ropivacaine dosing of bilateral SAP catheters for sternotomy pain.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>NCT04648774.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 4","pages":"Pages 1161-1169"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224007724","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Moderate-to-severe pain is common after cardiac surgery, peaking during the first and second postoperative days. Several nerve blocks for sternotomy have been described; however, the optimal location for continuous catheters has not been established. This study assessed the feasibility of a larger trial evaluating the efficacy of serratus anterior plane (SAP) catheter analgesia for sternotomy pain.

Methods

This double-blinded trial included patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy. Bilateral SAP catheters were placed in all participants, and randomised to ropivacaine or placebo. We assessed feasibility based on predetermined endpoints: (1) average recruitment rate >4 per month; (2) protocol adherence rate >90%; (3) primary outcome measurement rate >90%; and (4) significant catheter-related adverse event rate ≤2%. The quality of recovery index (QoR-15) was compared using an independent t-test.

Results

Of 52 participants randomised, feasibility data were available for 50. A definitive study was deemed ‘not feasible’ in our standalone centre owing to a low recruitment rate (2.4 per month) and a high adverse event rate (pneumothorax rate 12%). There were no major protocol deviations but minor deviations in 12% of participants. Pain, opioid consumption, complications, and quality of recovery were not different between groups. Long-term pain at 3 months was low in both groups.

Conclusions

A single-centre trial was deemed not feasible for our setting. With limited data, the quality of recovery was not different with ropivacaine dosing of bilateral SAP catheters for sternotomy pain.

Clinical trial registration

NCT04648774.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连续前锯肌阻滞用于心脏手术后胸骨切开镇痛:一项单中心可行性研究。
背景:中度至重度疼痛是心脏手术后常见的疼痛,在术后第一天和第二天达到高峰。已经描述了几种胸骨切开术的神经阻滞;然而,连续置管的最佳位置尚未确定。本研究评估了一项大型试验的可行性,该试验评估了前锯肌(SAP)导管镇痛对胸骨切开疼痛的疗效。方法:本双盲试验纳入经胸骨切开行心脏手术的患者。所有参与者均放置双侧SAP导管,并随机分为罗哌卡因组或安慰剂组。我们基于预先确定的终点评估可行性:(1)平均招聘率为每月40美元;(2)协议遵守率>90%;(3)主要结局测量率>90%;(4)显著导管相关不良事件发生率≤2%。质量恢复指数(QoR-15)采用独立t检验进行比较。结果:52名随机参与者中,50名可获得可行性数据。由于招募率低(每月2.4例)和不良事件发生率高(气胸率12%),在我们的独立中心进行明确的研究被认为是“不可行”的。没有主要的方案偏差,但有12%的参与者存在较小的偏差。疼痛、阿片类药物的使用、并发症和恢复质量在两组之间没有差异。3个月时两组的长期疼痛均较低。结论:单中心试验在我们的环境中是不可行的。在有限的资料下,使用罗哌卡因双侧SAP导管治疗胸骨切开疼痛的恢复质量没有差异。临床试验注册:NCT04648774。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
Difficult Airway Society 2025 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in adults: the importance of anatomical endpoints in emergency front-of-neck access. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 283-307. Warning on dexmedetomidine for ICU sedation in younger patients: weighing the evidence. Optimisation of volatile anaesthetic capture efficiency by reducing system loss: a prospective observational study. Red cell distribution width does not improve prediction of postsurgical infectious complications. Factors associated with admission before the day of elective major surgery: an analysis of data from the UK Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1