Comparison of Outcomes of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Older Versus Younger Patients.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancers Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.3390/cancers17020310
Giacomo Adoncecchi, Ambuj Kumar, Krishnakar Mogili, Rawan Faramand, Hien Liu, Farhad Khimani, Asmita Mishra, Michael Nieder, Taiga Nishihori, Doris Hansen, Michael Jain, Aleksandr Lazaryan, Lia Perez, Joseph Pidala, Frederick Locke, Claudio Anasetti, Nelli Bejanyan, Hany Elmariah
{"title":"Comparison of Outcomes of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Older Versus Younger Patients.","authors":"Giacomo Adoncecchi, Ambuj Kumar, Krishnakar Mogili, Rawan Faramand, Hien Liu, Farhad Khimani, Asmita Mishra, Michael Nieder, Taiga Nishihori, Doris Hansen, Michael Jain, Aleksandr Lazaryan, Lia Perez, Joseph Pidala, Frederick Locke, Claudio Anasetti, Nelli Bejanyan, Hany Elmariah","doi":"10.3390/cancers17020310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have shown that allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from an HLA haploidentical (haplo) donor followed by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) results in lower relapse rates and improved DFS when compared to haplo bone marrow transplant (BMT) with PTCy. However, PBSCT leads to higher rates of GVHD. It is unknown whether the benefits of haplo PBSCT may be nullified in older patients (>60 years) by a higher susceptibility to GVHD and transplant related toxicity. Thus, we sought to determine if older patients receiving haplo PBSCT with PTCy experience significantly worse outcomes than younger patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 121 adult patients with hematologic malignancies treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center with allogeneic haplo PBSCT followed by PTCy and compared outcomes of patients ≥60 years (n = 55) versus patients <60 years (n = 66).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) from the competing risk regression analysis was worse for the older patient group (SHR = 4.05, 95% CI: 1.43-11.47, <i>p</i> = 0.008). However, there was no significant difference between groups in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, disease-free survival (DFS), or overall survival (OS). Instead, hematopoietic comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥ 3 was associated with worse DFS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.04-3.34, <i>p</i> = 0.035) and OS (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.03-3.84, <i>p</i>-value = 0.042). Subgroup analysis of patients ≥60 years showed a trend toward improved 2-year OS with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (Flu/Cy/TBI) versus fludarabine/busulfan: 71% versus 53% (HR = 0.47, <i>p</i> = 0.121). In patients over 70 years (n = 14), NRM was 8% and OS was 76% at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given similar OS and DFS between patients aged >60 years and those <60, haplo PBSCT with PTCy appears to be an appropriate transplant platform for older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from an HLA haploidentical (haplo) donor followed by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) results in lower relapse rates and improved DFS when compared to haplo bone marrow transplant (BMT) with PTCy. However, PBSCT leads to higher rates of GVHD. It is unknown whether the benefits of haplo PBSCT may be nullified in older patients (>60 years) by a higher susceptibility to GVHD and transplant related toxicity. Thus, we sought to determine if older patients receiving haplo PBSCT with PTCy experience significantly worse outcomes than younger patients.

Methods: We evaluated 121 adult patients with hematologic malignancies treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center with allogeneic haplo PBSCT followed by PTCy and compared outcomes of patients ≥60 years (n = 55) versus patients <60 years (n = 66).

Results: The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) from the competing risk regression analysis was worse for the older patient group (SHR = 4.05, 95% CI: 1.43-11.47, p = 0.008). However, there was no significant difference between groups in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, disease-free survival (DFS), or overall survival (OS). Instead, hematopoietic comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥ 3 was associated with worse DFS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.04-3.34, p = 0.035) and OS (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.03-3.84, p-value = 0.042). Subgroup analysis of patients ≥60 years showed a trend toward improved 2-year OS with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (Flu/Cy/TBI) versus fludarabine/busulfan: 71% versus 53% (HR = 0.47, p = 0.121). In patients over 70 years (n = 14), NRM was 8% and OS was 76% at 1 year.

Conclusion: Given similar OS and DFS between patients aged >60 years and those <60, haplo PBSCT with PTCy appears to be an appropriate transplant platform for older patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者与年轻患者移植后环磷酰胺与同种异体外周血干细胞移植结果的比较。
背景:先前的研究表明,与单倍体骨髓移植(BMT)与PTCy相比,来自HLA单倍体(haplo)供者的同种异体外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT),移植后使用环磷酰胺(PTCy)预防移植物抗宿主病(GVHD),可降低复发率并改善DFS。然而,PBSCT导致更高的GVHD发生率。目前尚不清楚老年患者(60岁以上)对GVHD和移植相关毒性的易感性较高,是否会使单plo PBSCT的益处无效。因此,我们试图确定老年患者接受单倍体PBSCT合并PTCy的预后是否明显差于年轻患者。方法:我们评估了121例在Moffitt癌症中心接受同种异体单倍体PBSCT和PTCy治疗的成年血液恶性肿瘤患者,并比较了≥60岁患者(n = 55)和患者的结果。结果:竞争风险回归分析显示,老年患者组的累积非复发死亡率(NRM)更差(SHR = 4.05, 95% CI: 1.43-11.47, p = 0.008)。然而,在移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)、复发、无病生存期(DFS)或总生存期(OS)方面,两组间无显著差异。相反,造血共病指数(HCT-CI)≥3与较差的DFS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.04-3.34, p = 0.035)和OS (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.03-3.84, p值= 0.042)相关。≥60岁患者的亚组分析显示,氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺/全身照射(Flu/Cy/TBI)与氟达拉滨/busulfan相比,有改善2年OS的趋势:71%对53% (HR = 0.47, p = 0.121)。在70岁以上的患者(n = 14)中,1年时NRM为8%,OS为76%。结论:60 ~ 60岁患者的OS和DFS基本相同
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Chen et al. LncRNA ERVH48-1 Contributes to the Drug Resistance of Prostate Cancer and Proliferation through Sponging of miR-4784 to the Activation of the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. Cancers 2023, 15, 1902. Supramaximal Resection in Glioblastoma: Expanding Surgical Boundaries in the Era of Precision Neuro-Oncology-A Systematic Review. Immunohistochemical Expression of IDO and PD-L1 in Distinct Compartments of Breast Cancer Tissue: Correlation with Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes. Comparison of Comprehensive Serum miRNA Sequencing and Apolipoprotein A2 Isoforms for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Breast Cancer Histopathology: Toward Improved Diagnosis and Prognosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1