Patterns of balancing and compensating primary tooth extractions among paediatric dentists

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Dental Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1038/s41415-024-7783-z
Eser Rengin Nalbantoglu, Parmjit Singh
{"title":"Patterns of balancing and compensating primary tooth extractions among paediatric dentists","authors":"Eser Rengin Nalbantoglu, Parmjit Singh","doi":"10.1038/s41415-024-7783-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Balancing and compensating extractions (BCEs) of primary teeth aims to minimise the development of more severe malocclusions and reduce the need for subsequent complex orthodontics. Purpose To assess the demographics, practice characteristics and clinical preferences of United Kingdom paediatric dentists for BCEs of primary teeth. Methods All members of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry were sent an electronic questionnaire. Questions offered frequency options (always/frequently, often/sometimes and rarely/never) for a range of clinical scenarios in patients up to five years and between 6-9 years. Results Of the 288 specialists invited, 67 (23.3%) completed the questionnaire. Respondents were mostly female (n = 55; 82.1%), with most working in secondary care (n = 51; 77.3%). The majority (n = 54; 81.8%) supported the application of guidelines. A total of 39 paediatric dentists (58.2%) always/frequently encountered BCEs, with 31 (46.2%) performing BCEs in over 40 patients in the past year. Additionally, 40 respondents (59.7%) reported always/frequently complying with guidelines. Data from 65 respondents indicates that 83.6% (n = 56) rarely/never made referrals to an orthodontist, while 65.7% (n = 44) rarely/never consulted an orthodontist (p <0.001). Conclusions There was variation across clinical scenarios, with good adherence to guidelines in BCEs of primary teeth among paediatric dentists. However, there was limited interdisciplinary collaboration with orthodontists.","PeriodicalId":9229,"journal":{"name":"British Dental Journal","volume":"238 2","pages":"122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-7783-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Balancing and compensating extractions (BCEs) of primary teeth aims to minimise the development of more severe malocclusions and reduce the need for subsequent complex orthodontics. Purpose To assess the demographics, practice characteristics and clinical preferences of United Kingdom paediatric dentists for BCEs of primary teeth. Methods All members of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry were sent an electronic questionnaire. Questions offered frequency options (always/frequently, often/sometimes and rarely/never) for a range of clinical scenarios in patients up to five years and between 6-9 years. Results Of the 288 specialists invited, 67 (23.3%) completed the questionnaire. Respondents were mostly female (n = 55; 82.1%), with most working in secondary care (n = 51; 77.3%). The majority (n = 54; 81.8%) supported the application of guidelines. A total of 39 paediatric dentists (58.2%) always/frequently encountered BCEs, with 31 (46.2%) performing BCEs in over 40 patients in the past year. Additionally, 40 respondents (59.7%) reported always/frequently complying with guidelines. Data from 65 respondents indicates that 83.6% (n = 56) rarely/never made referrals to an orthodontist, while 65.7% (n = 44) rarely/never consulted an orthodontist (p <0.001). Conclusions There was variation across clinical scenarios, with good adherence to guidelines in BCEs of primary teeth among paediatric dentists. However, there was limited interdisciplinary collaboration with orthodontists.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科牙医中平衡和补偿初级拔牙的模式。
平衡和补偿拔牙(BCEs)的目的是尽量减少更严重的错咬合的发展,并减少后续复杂的正畸治疗的需要。目的了解英国儿科牙医进行乳牙bce的人口学特征、执业特点和临床偏好。方法对所有英国儿科牙科学会会员进行电子问卷调查。问题提供了频率选项(总是/经常,经常/有时和很少/从不),适用于5岁至6-9岁患者的一系列临床情况。结果288名专家中,67人(23.3%)完成问卷调查。受访者大多为女性(n = 55;82.1%),大多数在二级医疗机构工作(n = 51;77.3%)。多数(n = 54;81.8%)支持指南的应用。过去一年,共有39名儿科牙医(58.2%)经常/经常遇到脑电治疗,其中31名(46.2%)为40多名病人进行了脑电治疗。此外,40名受访者(59.7%)表示总是/经常遵守指引。来自65名受访者的数据表明,83.6% (n = 56)很少/从未转诊给正畸医生,而65.7% (n = 44)很少/从未咨询过正畸医生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Dental Journal
British Dental Journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1096
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The role of the BDJ is to inform its readers of ideas, opinions, developments and key issues in dentistry - clinical, practical and scientific - stimulating interest, debate and discussion amongst dentists of all disciplines. All papers published in the BDJ are subject to rigorous peer review.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes and periodontal disease: exploring awareness and current practice in a medical cohort in Scotland. Validating the pre-placement of orthodontic separators for atraumatic extractions: a split-mouth randomised trial. The association between social deprivation dental access and cervicofacial infections of odontogenic origin in South East London. Final call to register for the UK's largest dental event New dental examinations now open for applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1