Evaluation of gingival phenotype: the role of gingival thickness measurements from different vertical gingival levels.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Investigations Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-06143-x
Sude Yildirim Bolat, Muge Lutfioglu
{"title":"Evaluation of gingival phenotype: the role of gingival thickness measurements from different vertical gingival levels.","authors":"Sude Yildirim Bolat, Muge Lutfioglu","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06143-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to accurately assess the gingival phenotype by comparing the mean gingival thickness (GT) measured at various levels with a single-point GT measurement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty participants were divided into thin and thick gingival phenotype groups according to two different classifications. The first classification was based on the GT measured at the base of the gingival sulcus (GT1), whereas the second classification was based on the mean of the GT (GTm) measured at the base of the gingival sulcus (GT1 point) and 1 mm apical (GT2 point) and 2 mm apical to the base of the gingival sulcus (GT3 point). The GT was measured using the transgingival method from the buccal region of 1195 teeth, including the incisors, canines, premolars, and first molars, and was statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean GT was 0.95 ± 0.25 mm for GT1, 0.97 ± 0.3 mm for GT2, 0.81 ± 0.22 mm for GT3, and 0.91 ± 0.22 mm for the overall GTm. Good agreement was found between the GTm and GT1 and GT2 (k = 0.712; k = 0.758, p < 0.001for both), and moderate agreement was found between the GTm and GT3 (k = 0.534, p < 0.001). In both classifications, the effect of the dental arch location on the GT was found to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardized methods are required to minimize the differences in measurements from different vertical levels, which can influence gingival phenotype classification.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06369506.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Multiple gingival thickness measurements showed that gingival phenotype varied depending on the vertical level of the gingiva measurement point. Gingival phenotype assessment based on the mean of multiple gingival thickness measurements provided precise results, emphasizing the clinical importance of multiple measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11761086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06143-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to accurately assess the gingival phenotype by comparing the mean gingival thickness (GT) measured at various levels with a single-point GT measurement.

Materials and methods: Fifty participants were divided into thin and thick gingival phenotype groups according to two different classifications. The first classification was based on the GT measured at the base of the gingival sulcus (GT1), whereas the second classification was based on the mean of the GT (GTm) measured at the base of the gingival sulcus (GT1 point) and 1 mm apical (GT2 point) and 2 mm apical to the base of the gingival sulcus (GT3 point). The GT was measured using the transgingival method from the buccal region of 1195 teeth, including the incisors, canines, premolars, and first molars, and was statistically analyzed.

Results: The mean GT was 0.95 ± 0.25 mm for GT1, 0.97 ± 0.3 mm for GT2, 0.81 ± 0.22 mm for GT3, and 0.91 ± 0.22 mm for the overall GTm. Good agreement was found between the GTm and GT1 and GT2 (k = 0.712; k = 0.758, p < 0.001for both), and moderate agreement was found between the GTm and GT3 (k = 0.534, p < 0.001). In both classifications, the effect of the dental arch location on the GT was found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion: Standardized methods are required to minimize the differences in measurements from different vertical levels, which can influence gingival phenotype classification.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06369506.

Clinical relevance: Multiple gingival thickness measurements showed that gingival phenotype varied depending on the vertical level of the gingiva measurement point. Gingival phenotype assessment based on the mean of multiple gingival thickness measurements provided precise results, emphasizing the clinical importance of multiple measurements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙龈表型的评估:从不同垂直牙龈水平测量牙龈厚度的作用。
目的:本研究旨在通过比较不同水平的平均牙龈厚度(GT)和单点GT测量来准确评估牙龈表型。材料与方法:将50名受试者按两种不同的分类分为牙龈薄型组和厚型组。第一类是根据龈沟底部(GT1)测量的GT值进行分类,第二类是根据龈沟底部(GT1点)测量的GT值(GTm)与龈沟顶部(GT2点)1 mm和顶部到龈沟底部(GT3点)2 mm的平均值进行分类。采用经龈法对1195颗牙齿(包括门牙、犬牙、前磨牙和第一磨牙)的颊区进行GT测量,并进行统计学分析。结果:GT1的平均GTm为0.95±0.25 mm, GT2为0.97±0.3 mm, GT3为0.81±0.22 mm,总GTm为0.91±0.22 mm。GTm与GT1和GT2之间存在较好的一致性(k = 0.712;结论:不同垂直水平测量值的差异会影响牙龈表型的分型,需要标准化的方法来减少差异。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06369506。临床相关性:多次牙龈厚度测量显示,牙龈表型随牙龈测量点的垂直水平而变化。基于多次牙龈厚度测量平均值的牙龈表型评估提供了精确的结果,强调了多次测量的临床重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
期刊最新文献
Stress-Controlled Torsional Fatigue Assessment of Selected Contemporary Endodontic Instruments. Clinical and gustatory features in taste disorder patients based on oral Candida culture status. Evaluation of saliva and serum heme oxygenase, arylesterase and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 levels in patients with stage III periodontitis: a cross sectional study. Prevalence of caries in teeth adjacent to implant-supported prostheses and relationship with implant location and the manner of restoration placement: a retrospective cohort study. Association and predictive value of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen and periodontal indices in periodontitis severity : a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1