Katharina Steeg, Gabriele Anja Krombach, Michael Horst Friebe
{"title":"A Review of Needle Navigation Technologies in Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgeries-Toward a More Effective and Easy-to-Apply Process.","authors":"Katharina Steeg, Gabriele Anja Krombach, Michael Horst Friebe","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15020197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This review evaluates needle navigation technologies in minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery (MICS), identifying their strengths and limitations and the requirements for an ideal needle navigation system that features optimal guidance and easy adoption in clinical practice. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE databases up until June 2024 identified original studies on needle navigation in MICS. Eligible studies were those published within the past decade and that performed MICS requiring needle navigation technologies in adult patients. Animal studies, case reports, clinical trials, or laboratory experiments were excluded to focus on actively deployed techniques in clinical practice. Extracted data included the study year, modalities used, procedures performed, and the reported strengths and limitations, from which the requirements for an optimal needle navigation system were derived. <b>Results:</b> Of 36 eligible articles, 21 used ultrasound (US) for real-time imaging despite depth and needle visibility challenges. Computer tomography (CT)-guided fluoroscopy, cited in 19 articles, enhanced deep structure visualization but involved radiation risks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), though excellent for soft-tissue contrast, was not used due to metallic tool incompatibility. Multimodal techniques, like US-fluoroscopy fusion, improved accuracy but added cost and workflow complexity. No single technology meets all the criteria for an ideal needle navigation system, which should combine real-time imaging, 3D spatial awareness, and tissue integrity feedback while being cost-effective and easily integrated into existing workflows. <b>Conclusions:</b> This review derived the criteria and obstacles an ideal needle navigation system must address before its clinical adoption, along with novel technological approaches that show potential to overcome those challenges. For instance, fusion technologies overlay information from multiple visual approaches within a single interface to overcome individual limitations. Additionally, emerging diagnostic methods like vibroacoustic sensing or optical fiber needles offer information from complementary sensory channels, augmenting visual approaches with insights into tissue integrity and structure, thereby paving the way for enhanced needle navigation systems in MICS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This review evaluates needle navigation technologies in minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery (MICS), identifying their strengths and limitations and the requirements for an ideal needle navigation system that features optimal guidance and easy adoption in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE databases up until June 2024 identified original studies on needle navigation in MICS. Eligible studies were those published within the past decade and that performed MICS requiring needle navigation technologies in adult patients. Animal studies, case reports, clinical trials, or laboratory experiments were excluded to focus on actively deployed techniques in clinical practice. Extracted data included the study year, modalities used, procedures performed, and the reported strengths and limitations, from which the requirements for an optimal needle navigation system were derived. Results: Of 36 eligible articles, 21 used ultrasound (US) for real-time imaging despite depth and needle visibility challenges. Computer tomography (CT)-guided fluoroscopy, cited in 19 articles, enhanced deep structure visualization but involved radiation risks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), though excellent for soft-tissue contrast, was not used due to metallic tool incompatibility. Multimodal techniques, like US-fluoroscopy fusion, improved accuracy but added cost and workflow complexity. No single technology meets all the criteria for an ideal needle navigation system, which should combine real-time imaging, 3D spatial awareness, and tissue integrity feedback while being cost-effective and easily integrated into existing workflows. Conclusions: This review derived the criteria and obstacles an ideal needle navigation system must address before its clinical adoption, along with novel technological approaches that show potential to overcome those challenges. For instance, fusion technologies overlay information from multiple visual approaches within a single interface to overcome individual limitations. Additionally, emerging diagnostic methods like vibroacoustic sensing or optical fiber needles offer information from complementary sensory channels, augmenting visual approaches with insights into tissue integrity and structure, thereby paving the way for enhanced needle navigation systems in MICS.
背景:本综述评估了微创心血管手术(MICS)中的针头导航技术,确定了它们的优势和局限性,以及理想的针头导航系统的要求,该系统具有最佳的引导和易于在临床实践中采用。方法:系统检索PubMed, Web of Science和IEEE数据库,直到2024年6月确定了MICS中针头导航的原始研究。合格的研究是在过去十年内发表的,并且在成人患者中进行了需要针头导航技术的MICS。排除动物研究、病例报告、临床试验或实验室实验,重点关注临床实践中积极部署的技术。提取的数据包括研究年份、使用的方式、执行的程序以及报告的优势和局限性,从中得出了最佳针头导航系统的要求。结果:在36篇符合条件的文章中,21篇使用超声(US)进行实时成像,尽管深度和针头可见性存在挑战。19篇文章引用了计算机断层扫描(CT)引导的透视检查,增强了深部结构的可视化,但涉及辐射风险。磁共振成像(MRI)虽然对软组织对比很好,但由于金属工具不相容,没有使用。多模式技术,如us -透视融合,提高了准确性,但增加了成本和工作流程的复杂性。没有一种技术能够满足理想的针导航系统的所有标准,它应该结合实时成像、3D空间感知和组织完整性反馈,同时具有成本效益,并且易于集成到现有的工作流程中。结论:本综述得出了理想的针头导航系统在临床应用前必须解决的标准和障碍,以及显示出克服这些挑战潜力的新技术方法。例如,融合技术将来自多个视觉方法的信息覆盖在一个界面内,以克服单个方法的局限性。此外,振动声传感或光纤针等新兴诊断方法提供了来自互补感觉通道的信息,通过对组织完整性和结构的洞察,增强了视觉方法,从而为MICS中增强的针导航系统铺平了道路。
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.