Hung-Yi Huang, Meng-Hao Lin, Chu-Hsiang Hsu, Liang-Tseng Kuo
{"title":"Shoulder Physiological Offset Parameters in Asian Populations-A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.","authors":"Hung-Yi Huang, Meng-Hao Lin, Chu-Hsiang Hsu, Liang-Tseng Kuo","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15020146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Physical shoulder offset parameters (SOPs) play important roles in the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder diseases. However, there is little research analyzing SOPs in healthy shoulders using cross-sectional MRI images, especially in Asians. Therefore, this study aimed to establish physiological reference values of shoulder parameters for Asian populations. <b>Methods</b>: This was a retrospective imaging study using MRI images of the shoulder joints of 500 patients (mean age: 55.9 ± 14.0 years). We measured the following SOPs of the normal joint: HO, GO, lateral glenoidal humeral offset (LGHO), humeral shaft axis offset (HAO), and cortical offset (CO). In addition, the offset parameters were examined for associations with age, gender, side, and osteoarthritis. <b>Results</b>: The mean HO was 22.9 (±2.4) mm, the mean GO was 62.3 (±6.6) mm, the mean LGHO was 48.9 (±4.2) mm, the mean HAO was 25.2 (±2.8) mm, and the mean CO was 15.7 (±2.7) mm. Male patients exhibited significantly higher values across all SOPs compared to female patients. In addition, there was a significantly lower mean value for HAO in left shoulders (HAO: 24.7± 2.8 mm vs. 25.5 ± 2.8 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.011). There was a negatively significant correlation between age and all SOPs. No significant difference in mean values was noted between shoulders with osteoarthritis and non-osteoarthritis in any SOPs. <b>Conclusions</b>: Significant gender- and age-specific differences were noted for all measured SOPs. In addition, right shoulders did not show higher mean SOP values than left shoulders, except for HAO, suggesting that the contralateral joint is a reliable reference for surgical planning. These findings should be considered in shoulder surgery planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Physical shoulder offset parameters (SOPs) play important roles in the diagnosis and treatment of shoulder diseases. However, there is little research analyzing SOPs in healthy shoulders using cross-sectional MRI images, especially in Asians. Therefore, this study aimed to establish physiological reference values of shoulder parameters for Asian populations. Methods: This was a retrospective imaging study using MRI images of the shoulder joints of 500 patients (mean age: 55.9 ± 14.0 years). We measured the following SOPs of the normal joint: HO, GO, lateral glenoidal humeral offset (LGHO), humeral shaft axis offset (HAO), and cortical offset (CO). In addition, the offset parameters were examined for associations with age, gender, side, and osteoarthritis. Results: The mean HO was 22.9 (±2.4) mm, the mean GO was 62.3 (±6.6) mm, the mean LGHO was 48.9 (±4.2) mm, the mean HAO was 25.2 (±2.8) mm, and the mean CO was 15.7 (±2.7) mm. Male patients exhibited significantly higher values across all SOPs compared to female patients. In addition, there was a significantly lower mean value for HAO in left shoulders (HAO: 24.7± 2.8 mm vs. 25.5 ± 2.8 mm, p = 0.011). There was a negatively significant correlation between age and all SOPs. No significant difference in mean values was noted between shoulders with osteoarthritis and non-osteoarthritis in any SOPs. Conclusions: Significant gender- and age-specific differences were noted for all measured SOPs. In addition, right shoulders did not show higher mean SOP values than left shoulders, except for HAO, suggesting that the contralateral joint is a reliable reference for surgical planning. These findings should be considered in shoulder surgery planning.
背景/目的:物理肩偏参数(SOPs)在肩关节疾病的诊断和治疗中具有重要意义。然而,很少有研究使用横断面MRI图像分析健康肩部的sop,特别是亚洲人。因此,本研究旨在建立亚洲人群肩部参数的生理参考值。方法:回顾性影像学研究500例患者肩关节MRI图像(平均年龄:55.9±14.0岁)。我们测量了正常关节的以下sop: HO, GO,外侧盂肱偏移(LGHO),肱骨轴偏移(HAO)和皮质偏移(CO)。此外,偏移参数被检查与年龄,性别,侧面和骨关节炎的关系。结果:平均HO为22.9(±2.4)mm,平均GO为62.3(±6.6)mm,平均LGHO为48.9(±4.2)mm,平均HAO为25.2(±2.8)mm,平均CO为15.7(±2.7)mm,男性患者的SOPs值明显高于女性患者。此外,左肩的HAO平均值明显较低(HAO: 24.7±2.8 mm vs. 25.5±2.8 mm, p = 0.011)。年龄与各项sop呈显著负相关。在任何sop中,骨关节炎和非骨关节炎肩关节的平均值没有显著差异。结论:所有测量的sop均存在显著的性别和年龄特异性差异。此外,除了HAO外,右肩的平均SOP值没有高于左肩,这表明对侧关节是手术计划的可靠参考。这些发现应在肩部手术计划中加以考虑。
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.